A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Michael Scott McCracken, Valeria V. Gordan, Mark S. Litaker, Ellen Funkhouser, Jeffrey L. Fellows, Douglass G. Shamp, Vibeke Qvist, Jeffrey S. Meral, Gregg H. Gilbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Knowing which factors influence restoration longevity can help clinicians make sound treatment decisions. The authors analyzed data from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network to identify predictors of early failures of amalgam and resinbased composite (RBC) restorations. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, the authors gathered information from clinicians and offices participating in the network. Clinicians completed a baseline data collection form at the time of restoration placement and annually thereafter. Data collected included patient factors, practice factors and dentist factors, and the authors analyzed them by using mixed-model logistic regression. Results: A total of 226 practitioners followed up 6,218 direct restorations in 3,855 patients; 386 restorations failed (6.2 percent) during the mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 23.7 (8.8) months. The number of tooth surfaces restored at baseline helped predict subsequent restoration failure; restorations with four or more restored surfaces were more than four times more likely to fail. Restorative material was not associated significantly with longevity; neither was tooth type. Older patient age was associated highly with failure (P <.001). The failure rate for children was 4 percent, compared with 10 percent for people 65 years or older. Dentist's sex and practice workload were associated significantly with restoration longevity. Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study, these factors were significantly predictive of failure for amalgam and RBC restorations: patient's age, a higher number of surfaces restored at baseline, the dentist's sex and the practice workload. Material choice was not significantly predictive in these early results. Practical Implications: If clinicians can recognize and identify the risk factors associated with early restoration failure, more effective treatment plans may be offered to the patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)583-593
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume144
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Composite Resins
Tooth
Dentists
Research
Workload
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies
Logistic Models
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Amalgam
  • Decision making
  • Dental restorations
  • Direct restorations
  • Evidencebased dentistry
  • Operative dentistry
  • Resin-based composite

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. / McCracken, Michael Scott; Gordan, Valeria V.; Litaker, Mark S.; Funkhouser, Ellen; Fellows, Jeffrey L.; Shamp, Douglass G.; Qvist, Vibeke; Meral, Jeffrey S.; Gilbert, Gregg H.

In: Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 144, No. 6, 01.01.2013, p. 583-593.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCracken, MS, Gordan, VV, Litaker, MS, Funkhouser, E, Fellows, JL, Shamp, DG, Qvist, V, Meral, JS & Gilbert, GH 2013, 'A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network', Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 144, no. 6, pp. 583-593. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169
McCracken, Michael Scott ; Gordan, Valeria V. ; Litaker, Mark S. ; Funkhouser, Ellen ; Fellows, Jeffrey L. ; Shamp, Douglass G. ; Qvist, Vibeke ; Meral, Jeffrey S. ; Gilbert, Gregg H. / A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. In: Journal of the American Dental Association. 2013 ; Vol. 144, No. 6. pp. 583-593.
@article{9a10e63735dc45f384941f0f66784d4e,
title = "A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network",
abstract = "Background: Knowing which factors influence restoration longevity can help clinicians make sound treatment decisions. The authors analyzed data from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network to identify predictors of early failures of amalgam and resinbased composite (RBC) restorations. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, the authors gathered information from clinicians and offices participating in the network. Clinicians completed a baseline data collection form at the time of restoration placement and annually thereafter. Data collected included patient factors, practice factors and dentist factors, and the authors analyzed them by using mixed-model logistic regression. Results: A total of 226 practitioners followed up 6,218 direct restorations in 3,855 patients; 386 restorations failed (6.2 percent) during the mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 23.7 (8.8) months. The number of tooth surfaces restored at baseline helped predict subsequent restoration failure; restorations with four or more restored surfaces were more than four times more likely to fail. Restorative material was not associated significantly with longevity; neither was tooth type. Older patient age was associated highly with failure (P <.001). The failure rate for children was 4 percent, compared with 10 percent for people 65 years or older. Dentist's sex and practice workload were associated significantly with restoration longevity. Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study, these factors were significantly predictive of failure for amalgam and RBC restorations: patient's age, a higher number of surfaces restored at baseline, the dentist's sex and the practice workload. Material choice was not significantly predictive in these early results. Practical Implications: If clinicians can recognize and identify the risk factors associated with early restoration failure, more effective treatment plans may be offered to the patient.",
keywords = "Amalgam, Decision making, Dental restorations, Direct restorations, Evidencebased dentistry, Operative dentistry, Resin-based composite",
author = "McCracken, {Michael Scott} and Gordan, {Valeria V.} and Litaker, {Mark S.} and Ellen Funkhouser and Fellows, {Jeffrey L.} and Shamp, {Douglass G.} and Vibeke Qvist and Meral, {Jeffrey S.} and Gilbert, {Gregg H.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "583--593",
journal = "Journal of the American Dental Association",
issn = "0002-8177",
publisher = "American Dental Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

AU - McCracken, Michael Scott

AU - Gordan, Valeria V.

AU - Litaker, Mark S.

AU - Funkhouser, Ellen

AU - Fellows, Jeffrey L.

AU - Shamp, Douglass G.

AU - Qvist, Vibeke

AU - Meral, Jeffrey S.

AU - Gilbert, Gregg H.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Background: Knowing which factors influence restoration longevity can help clinicians make sound treatment decisions. The authors analyzed data from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network to identify predictors of early failures of amalgam and resinbased composite (RBC) restorations. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, the authors gathered information from clinicians and offices participating in the network. Clinicians completed a baseline data collection form at the time of restoration placement and annually thereafter. Data collected included patient factors, practice factors and dentist factors, and the authors analyzed them by using mixed-model logistic regression. Results: A total of 226 practitioners followed up 6,218 direct restorations in 3,855 patients; 386 restorations failed (6.2 percent) during the mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 23.7 (8.8) months. The number of tooth surfaces restored at baseline helped predict subsequent restoration failure; restorations with four or more restored surfaces were more than four times more likely to fail. Restorative material was not associated significantly with longevity; neither was tooth type. Older patient age was associated highly with failure (P <.001). The failure rate for children was 4 percent, compared with 10 percent for people 65 years or older. Dentist's sex and practice workload were associated significantly with restoration longevity. Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study, these factors were significantly predictive of failure for amalgam and RBC restorations: patient's age, a higher number of surfaces restored at baseline, the dentist's sex and the practice workload. Material choice was not significantly predictive in these early results. Practical Implications: If clinicians can recognize and identify the risk factors associated with early restoration failure, more effective treatment plans may be offered to the patient.

AB - Background: Knowing which factors influence restoration longevity can help clinicians make sound treatment decisions. The authors analyzed data from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network to identify predictors of early failures of amalgam and resinbased composite (RBC) restorations. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, the authors gathered information from clinicians and offices participating in the network. Clinicians completed a baseline data collection form at the time of restoration placement and annually thereafter. Data collected included patient factors, practice factors and dentist factors, and the authors analyzed them by using mixed-model logistic regression. Results: A total of 226 practitioners followed up 6,218 direct restorations in 3,855 patients; 386 restorations failed (6.2 percent) during the mean (standard deviation) follow-up of 23.7 (8.8) months. The number of tooth surfaces restored at baseline helped predict subsequent restoration failure; restorations with four or more restored surfaces were more than four times more likely to fail. Restorative material was not associated significantly with longevity; neither was tooth type. Older patient age was associated highly with failure (P <.001). The failure rate for children was 4 percent, compared with 10 percent for people 65 years or older. Dentist's sex and practice workload were associated significantly with restoration longevity. Conclusions: In this prospective cohort study, these factors were significantly predictive of failure for amalgam and RBC restorations: patient's age, a higher number of surfaces restored at baseline, the dentist's sex and the practice workload. Material choice was not significantly predictive in these early results. Practical Implications: If clinicians can recognize and identify the risk factors associated with early restoration failure, more effective treatment plans may be offered to the patient.

KW - Amalgam

KW - Decision making

KW - Dental restorations

KW - Direct restorations

KW - Evidencebased dentistry

KW - Operative dentistry

KW - Resin-based composite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879609671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879609671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169

DO - 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169

M3 - Article

VL - 144

SP - 583

EP - 593

JO - Journal of the American Dental Association

JF - Journal of the American Dental Association

SN - 0002-8177

IS - 6

ER -