A comparative photoelastic stress analysis of internal root stresses between RC Prep and saline when applied to the Profile/GT rotary instrumentation system

Darin N. Anderson, Anthony P. Joyce, Steven Roberts, Royce Runner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the amount of stress produced by GT ProFile (GT) and ProFile (PF) rotary files lubricated with either RC Prep (RCP) or saline (S) on the walls of prepared simulated canals. Twenty-four 10-mm long canals with a 10 mm radius of curvature were prepared in PL-2 photoelastic acrylic blocks which were lubricated with either RCP or S. The files were inserted into a Nouvag handpiece mounted to an Instron 4502 universal testing machine and lowered into the canal at a rate of 60 mm/min and a rotational speed of 300 RPM. The following four GTs and four PFs were sequentially introduced into predetermined depths of each canal: 20/.10, 20/.08, 20/.06, 20/.04, 40/.04, 35/.04, 30/.04, and 25/.04. Total areas of stress created by each file were captured by digital video images and measured using Image J software. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05, n = 24). The GT/RCP group demonstrated a significant average of 64.22% less stress than GT/S group. The PF (25, 30, and 35)/ RCP groups demonstrated a significant average of 27.02% less stress than the same S groups. PF (40) produced a negligible amount of stress regardless of the lubricant type. The results reveal that using RCP as a lubricant when instrumenting curved canals with GT and PF results in less stress when compared to saline.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-224
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006

Fingerprint

Lubricants
Statistical Data Interpretation
Analysis of Variance
Software
RC-Prep

Keywords

  • GT Profile
  • Lubricant
  • Photoelastic
  • Profile
  • RC Prep
  • Saline

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A comparative photoelastic stress analysis of internal root stresses between RC Prep and saline when applied to the Profile/GT rotary instrumentation system. / Anderson, Darin N.; Joyce, Anthony P.; Roberts, Steven; Runner, Royce.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.03.2006, p. 222-224.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Anderson, Darin N. ; Joyce, Anthony P. ; Roberts, Steven ; Runner, Royce. / A comparative photoelastic stress analysis of internal root stresses between RC Prep and saline when applied to the Profile/GT rotary instrumentation system. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2006 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 222-224.
@article{547df4563c4044068a82876cee122b7d,
title = "A comparative photoelastic stress analysis of internal root stresses between RC Prep and saline when applied to the Profile/GT rotary instrumentation system",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the amount of stress produced by GT ProFile (GT) and ProFile (PF) rotary files lubricated with either RC Prep (RCP) or saline (S) on the walls of prepared simulated canals. Twenty-four 10-mm long canals with a 10 mm radius of curvature were prepared in PL-2 photoelastic acrylic blocks which were lubricated with either RCP or S. The files were inserted into a Nouvag handpiece mounted to an Instron 4502 universal testing machine and lowered into the canal at a rate of 60 mm/min and a rotational speed of 300 RPM. The following four GTs and four PFs were sequentially introduced into predetermined depths of each canal: 20/.10, 20/.08, 20/.06, 20/.04, 40/.04, 35/.04, 30/.04, and 25/.04. Total areas of stress created by each file were captured by digital video images and measured using Image J software. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05, n = 24). The GT/RCP group demonstrated a significant average of 64.22{\%} less stress than GT/S group. The PF (25, 30, and 35)/ RCP groups demonstrated a significant average of 27.02{\%} less stress than the same S groups. PF (40) produced a negligible amount of stress regardless of the lubricant type. The results reveal that using RCP as a lubricant when instrumenting curved canals with GT and PF results in less stress when compared to saline.",
keywords = "GT Profile, Lubricant, Photoelastic, Profile, RC Prep, Saline",
author = "Anderson, {Darin N.} and Joyce, {Anthony P.} and Steven Roberts and Royce Runner",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "222--224",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative photoelastic stress analysis of internal root stresses between RC Prep and saline when applied to the Profile/GT rotary instrumentation system

AU - Anderson, Darin N.

AU - Joyce, Anthony P.

AU - Roberts, Steven

AU - Runner, Royce

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the amount of stress produced by GT ProFile (GT) and ProFile (PF) rotary files lubricated with either RC Prep (RCP) or saline (S) on the walls of prepared simulated canals. Twenty-four 10-mm long canals with a 10 mm radius of curvature were prepared in PL-2 photoelastic acrylic blocks which were lubricated with either RCP or S. The files were inserted into a Nouvag handpiece mounted to an Instron 4502 universal testing machine and lowered into the canal at a rate of 60 mm/min and a rotational speed of 300 RPM. The following four GTs and four PFs were sequentially introduced into predetermined depths of each canal: 20/.10, 20/.08, 20/.06, 20/.04, 40/.04, 35/.04, 30/.04, and 25/.04. Total areas of stress created by each file were captured by digital video images and measured using Image J software. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05, n = 24). The GT/RCP group demonstrated a significant average of 64.22% less stress than GT/S group. The PF (25, 30, and 35)/ RCP groups demonstrated a significant average of 27.02% less stress than the same S groups. PF (40) produced a negligible amount of stress regardless of the lubricant type. The results reveal that using RCP as a lubricant when instrumenting curved canals with GT and PF results in less stress when compared to saline.

AB - The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the amount of stress produced by GT ProFile (GT) and ProFile (PF) rotary files lubricated with either RC Prep (RCP) or saline (S) on the walls of prepared simulated canals. Twenty-four 10-mm long canals with a 10 mm radius of curvature were prepared in PL-2 photoelastic acrylic blocks which were lubricated with either RCP or S. The files were inserted into a Nouvag handpiece mounted to an Instron 4502 universal testing machine and lowered into the canal at a rate of 60 mm/min and a rotational speed of 300 RPM. The following four GTs and four PFs were sequentially introduced into predetermined depths of each canal: 20/.10, 20/.08, 20/.06, 20/.04, 40/.04, 35/.04, 30/.04, and 25/.04. Total areas of stress created by each file were captured by digital video images and measured using Image J software. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using a two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05, n = 24). The GT/RCP group demonstrated a significant average of 64.22% less stress than GT/S group. The PF (25, 30, and 35)/ RCP groups demonstrated a significant average of 27.02% less stress than the same S groups. PF (40) produced a negligible amount of stress regardless of the lubricant type. The results reveal that using RCP as a lubricant when instrumenting curved canals with GT and PF results in less stress when compared to saline.

KW - GT Profile

KW - Lubricant

KW - Photoelastic

KW - Profile

KW - RC Prep

KW - Saline

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644533834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644533834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.053

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.053

M3 - Article

C2 - 16500231

AN - SCOPUS:33644533834

VL - 32

SP - 222

EP - 224

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 3

ER -