A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients

Maria Michailidou, Terence OKeeffe, Jarrod M. Mosier, Randall S. Friese, Bellal Joseph, Peter Rhee, John C. Sakles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) has long been the gold standard for tracheal intubation in emergency and trauma patients. Video laryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly used in many settings and the purpose of this study was to compare its effectiveness to direct laryngoscopy in trauma patients. Our hypothesis was that the success rate of VL would be higher than that of DL. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on all trauma patients, from January 2008 to June 2011, who were intubated emergently in an academic level I trauma center. After intubation, the physician that performed the intubation completed a structured data collection form that included demographics, complications, and the presence of difficult airway predictors. Our primary outcome measure was overall successful tracheal intubation, which was defined as successful intubation with the first device used. Results: During the study period, 709 trauma patients were intubated by either VL or DL. VL was performed in 55 % of cases. The overall success rate of VL was 88 % compared to 83 % with DL (P = 0.05). Cervical (C-Spine) immobilization was predictive of higher initial success with VL (87 %) than with DL (80 %) (P < 0.05). In multivariate regression analysis DL was associated with higher risk of intubation failure compared to VL (OR 1.82, CI: 1.15-2.86). Conclusions: In trauma patients intubated emergently, VL had a significantly higher success rate than DL. These data suggest that, in select circumstances, VL is superior to DL for the intubation of trauma patients with difficult airways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)782-788
Number of pages7
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laryngoscopy
Intubation
Emergencies
Wounds and Injuries
Trauma Centers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients. / Michailidou, Maria; OKeeffe, Terence; Mosier, Jarrod M.; Friese, Randall S.; Joseph, Bellal; Rhee, Peter; Sakles, John C.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 782-788.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Michailidou, Maria ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Mosier, Jarrod M. ; Friese, Randall S. ; Joseph, Bellal ; Rhee, Peter ; Sakles, John C. / A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 782-788.
@article{deb3a4dbd80f48c69b022751def9bbed,
title = "A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients",
abstract = "Background: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) has long been the gold standard for tracheal intubation in emergency and trauma patients. Video laryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly used in many settings and the purpose of this study was to compare its effectiveness to direct laryngoscopy in trauma patients. Our hypothesis was that the success rate of VL would be higher than that of DL. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on all trauma patients, from January 2008 to June 2011, who were intubated emergently in an academic level I trauma center. After intubation, the physician that performed the intubation completed a structured data collection form that included demographics, complications, and the presence of difficult airway predictors. Our primary outcome measure was overall successful tracheal intubation, which was defined as successful intubation with the first device used. Results: During the study period, 709 trauma patients were intubated by either VL or DL. VL was performed in 55 {\%} of cases. The overall success rate of VL was 88 {\%} compared to 83 {\%} with DL (P = 0.05). Cervical (C-Spine) immobilization was predictive of higher initial success with VL (87 {\%}) than with DL (80 {\%}) (P < 0.05). In multivariate regression analysis DL was associated with higher risk of intubation failure compared to VL (OR 1.82, CI: 1.15-2.86). Conclusions: In trauma patients intubated emergently, VL had a significantly higher success rate than DL. These data suggest that, in select circumstances, VL is superior to DL for the intubation of trauma patients with difficult airways.",
author = "Maria Michailidou and Terence OKeeffe and Mosier, {Jarrod M.} and Friese, {Randall S.} and Bellal Joseph and Peter Rhee and Sakles, {John C.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-014-2845-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "782--788",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients

AU - Michailidou, Maria

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Mosier, Jarrod M.

AU - Friese, Randall S.

AU - Joseph, Bellal

AU - Rhee, Peter

AU - Sakles, John C.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) has long been the gold standard for tracheal intubation in emergency and trauma patients. Video laryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly used in many settings and the purpose of this study was to compare its effectiveness to direct laryngoscopy in trauma patients. Our hypothesis was that the success rate of VL would be higher than that of DL. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on all trauma patients, from January 2008 to June 2011, who were intubated emergently in an academic level I trauma center. After intubation, the physician that performed the intubation completed a structured data collection form that included demographics, complications, and the presence of difficult airway predictors. Our primary outcome measure was overall successful tracheal intubation, which was defined as successful intubation with the first device used. Results: During the study period, 709 trauma patients were intubated by either VL or DL. VL was performed in 55 % of cases. The overall success rate of VL was 88 % compared to 83 % with DL (P = 0.05). Cervical (C-Spine) immobilization was predictive of higher initial success with VL (87 %) than with DL (80 %) (P < 0.05). In multivariate regression analysis DL was associated with higher risk of intubation failure compared to VL (OR 1.82, CI: 1.15-2.86). Conclusions: In trauma patients intubated emergently, VL had a significantly higher success rate than DL. These data suggest that, in select circumstances, VL is superior to DL for the intubation of trauma patients with difficult airways.

AB - Background: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) has long been the gold standard for tracheal intubation in emergency and trauma patients. Video laryngoscopy (VL) is increasingly used in many settings and the purpose of this study was to compare its effectiveness to direct laryngoscopy in trauma patients. Our hypothesis was that the success rate of VL would be higher than that of DL. Methods: Data were collected prospectively on all trauma patients, from January 2008 to June 2011, who were intubated emergently in an academic level I trauma center. After intubation, the physician that performed the intubation completed a structured data collection form that included demographics, complications, and the presence of difficult airway predictors. Our primary outcome measure was overall successful tracheal intubation, which was defined as successful intubation with the first device used. Results: During the study period, 709 trauma patients were intubated by either VL or DL. VL was performed in 55 % of cases. The overall success rate of VL was 88 % compared to 83 % with DL (P = 0.05). Cervical (C-Spine) immobilization was predictive of higher initial success with VL (87 %) than with DL (80 %) (P < 0.05). In multivariate regression analysis DL was associated with higher risk of intubation failure compared to VL (OR 1.82, CI: 1.15-2.86). Conclusions: In trauma patients intubated emergently, VL had a significantly higher success rate than DL. These data suggest that, in select circumstances, VL is superior to DL for the intubation of trauma patients with difficult airways.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925539434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925539434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-014-2845-z

DO - 10.1007/s00268-014-2845-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 25348885

AN - SCOPUS:84925539434

VL - 39

SP - 782

EP - 788

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 3

ER -