A conserved sequence element in ribonuclease III processing signals is not required for accurate in vitro enzymatic cleavage

Bhadrani S. Chelladurai, Honglin Li, Allen W. Nicholson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ribonuclease III of Escherichia coli is prominently involved in the endoribonucleolytic processing of cell and viral-encoded RNAs. Towards the goal of defining the RNA sequence and structural elements that establish specific catalytic cleavage of RNase III processing signals, this report demonstrates that a 60 nucleotide RNA (R1.1 RNA) containing the bacteriophage 17 R1.1 RNase III processing signal, can be generated by in vitro enzymatic transcription of a synthetic deoxyoligonucleotide and accurately cleaved in vitro by RNase III. Several R1.1 RNA sequence variants were prepared to contain point mutations in the internal loop which, on the basis of a hypothetical 'dsRNA mimicry' structural model of RNase III processing signals, would be predicted to inhibit cleavage by disrupting essential tertiary RNA-RNA interactions. These R1.1 sequence variants are accurately and efficiently cleaved in vitro by RNase III, indicating that the dsRNA mimicry structure, if it does exist, is not important for substrate reactivity. Also, we tested the functional importance of the strongly conserved CUU/GAA base-pair sequence by constructing R1 .1 sequence variants containing base- pair changes within this element. These R1.1 variants are accurately cleaved at rates comparable to wild-type R1.1 RNA, indicating the nonessentiality of this conserved sequence element in establishing in vitro processing reactivity and selectivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1759-1766
Number of pages8
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Volume19
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 25 1991
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A conserved sequence element in ribonuclease III processing signals is not required for accurate in vitro enzymatic cleavage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this