A controlled study of palpatory diagnostic procedures: Assessment of sensitivity and specificity

R. S. Tarr, R. A. Feely, D. L. Richardson, A. L. Mulloy, K. E. Nelson, W. E. Perrin, E. F. Allin, M. E. Efrusy, S. I. Greenstein, R. D. Vatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine if experienced osteopathic physicians could diagnose disease states using palpatory findings as their source of diagnostic clues. Five examiners saw a total of 100 subjects. Two of the examiners were allowed to palpate the subject, the other 3 examiners were not. None of the 5 examiners had any knowledge of the subject's medical history, and none were allowed to talk to the subjects. Thus the nonpalpating examiners only had visual clues to aid in diagnosis, while the palpating examiners had both visual clues and palpatory clues. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the palpating and nonpalpating examiners thus indicated the ability of the palpating physicians to distinguish disease states by palpatory findings alone. One hundred subjects were examined: 22 patients with documented gastrointestinal disease, 31 patients with documented asthma (but were in remission), and 47 control subjects with a negative history for either gastrointestinal pathology or asthma. Controls were matched for appearance, age, sex, race, and weight, with the 2 groups of patients. The results showed that neither the palpating physicians nor the nonpalpating could correctly categorize the subjects as gastrointestinal patients, asthma patients, or controls. The palpating physicians did not demonstrate any increased diagnostic accuracy over the nonpalpating examiners. Reasons for these negative results are discussed, as is the issue of using appropriate control procedures in osteopathic clinical research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-301
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Osteopathic Association
Volume87
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 1987

Fingerprint

Sensitivity and Specificity
Asthma
Physicians
Osteopathic Physicians
Gastrointestinal Diseases
History
Pathology
Weights and Measures
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Tarr, R. S., Feely, R. A., Richardson, D. L., Mulloy, A. L., Nelson, K. E., Perrin, W. E., ... Vatt, R. D. (1987). A controlled study of palpatory diagnostic procedures: Assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 87(4), 296-301.

A controlled study of palpatory diagnostic procedures : Assessment of sensitivity and specificity. / Tarr, R. S.; Feely, R. A.; Richardson, D. L.; Mulloy, A. L.; Nelson, K. E.; Perrin, W. E.; Allin, E. F.; Efrusy, M. E.; Greenstein, S. I.; Vatt, R. D.

In: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol. 87, No. 4, 01.07.1987, p. 296-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tarr, RS, Feely, RA, Richardson, DL, Mulloy, AL, Nelson, KE, Perrin, WE, Allin, EF, Efrusy, ME, Greenstein, SI & Vatt, RD 1987, 'A controlled study of palpatory diagnostic procedures: Assessment of sensitivity and specificity', Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 296-301.
Tarr, R. S. ; Feely, R. A. ; Richardson, D. L. ; Mulloy, A. L. ; Nelson, K. E. ; Perrin, W. E. ; Allin, E. F. ; Efrusy, M. E. ; Greenstein, S. I. ; Vatt, R. D. / A controlled study of palpatory diagnostic procedures : Assessment of sensitivity and specificity. In: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association. 1987 ; Vol. 87, No. 4. pp. 296-301.
@article{b141dd33c81f4fbca1b22be32dfdcb9d,
title = "A controlled study of palpatory diagnostic procedures: Assessment of sensitivity and specificity",
abstract = "A study was conducted to determine if experienced osteopathic physicians could diagnose disease states using palpatory findings as their source of diagnostic clues. Five examiners saw a total of 100 subjects. Two of the examiners were allowed to palpate the subject, the other 3 examiners were not. None of the 5 examiners had any knowledge of the subject's medical history, and none were allowed to talk to the subjects. Thus the nonpalpating examiners only had visual clues to aid in diagnosis, while the palpating examiners had both visual clues and palpatory clues. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the palpating and nonpalpating examiners thus indicated the ability of the palpating physicians to distinguish disease states by palpatory findings alone. One hundred subjects were examined: 22 patients with documented gastrointestinal disease, 31 patients with documented asthma (but were in remission), and 47 control subjects with a negative history for either gastrointestinal pathology or asthma. Controls were matched for appearance, age, sex, race, and weight, with the 2 groups of patients. The results showed that neither the palpating physicians nor the nonpalpating could correctly categorize the subjects as gastrointestinal patients, asthma patients, or controls. The palpating physicians did not demonstrate any increased diagnostic accuracy over the nonpalpating examiners. Reasons for these negative results are discussed, as is the issue of using appropriate control procedures in osteopathic clinical research.",
author = "Tarr, {R. S.} and Feely, {R. A.} and Richardson, {D. L.} and Mulloy, {A. L.} and Nelson, {K. E.} and Perrin, {W. E.} and Allin, {E. F.} and Efrusy, {M. E.} and Greenstein, {S. I.} and Vatt, {R. D.}",
year = "1987",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "296--301",
journal = "The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association",
issn = "0098-6151",
publisher = "American Osteopathic Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A controlled study of palpatory diagnostic procedures

T2 - Assessment of sensitivity and specificity

AU - Tarr, R. S.

AU - Feely, R. A.

AU - Richardson, D. L.

AU - Mulloy, A. L.

AU - Nelson, K. E.

AU - Perrin, W. E.

AU - Allin, E. F.

AU - Efrusy, M. E.

AU - Greenstein, S. I.

AU - Vatt, R. D.

PY - 1987/7/1

Y1 - 1987/7/1

N2 - A study was conducted to determine if experienced osteopathic physicians could diagnose disease states using palpatory findings as their source of diagnostic clues. Five examiners saw a total of 100 subjects. Two of the examiners were allowed to palpate the subject, the other 3 examiners were not. None of the 5 examiners had any knowledge of the subject's medical history, and none were allowed to talk to the subjects. Thus the nonpalpating examiners only had visual clues to aid in diagnosis, while the palpating examiners had both visual clues and palpatory clues. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the palpating and nonpalpating examiners thus indicated the ability of the palpating physicians to distinguish disease states by palpatory findings alone. One hundred subjects were examined: 22 patients with documented gastrointestinal disease, 31 patients with documented asthma (but were in remission), and 47 control subjects with a negative history for either gastrointestinal pathology or asthma. Controls were matched for appearance, age, sex, race, and weight, with the 2 groups of patients. The results showed that neither the palpating physicians nor the nonpalpating could correctly categorize the subjects as gastrointestinal patients, asthma patients, or controls. The palpating physicians did not demonstrate any increased diagnostic accuracy over the nonpalpating examiners. Reasons for these negative results are discussed, as is the issue of using appropriate control procedures in osteopathic clinical research.

AB - A study was conducted to determine if experienced osteopathic physicians could diagnose disease states using palpatory findings as their source of diagnostic clues. Five examiners saw a total of 100 subjects. Two of the examiners were allowed to palpate the subject, the other 3 examiners were not. None of the 5 examiners had any knowledge of the subject's medical history, and none were allowed to talk to the subjects. Thus the nonpalpating examiners only had visual clues to aid in diagnosis, while the palpating examiners had both visual clues and palpatory clues. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the palpating and nonpalpating examiners thus indicated the ability of the palpating physicians to distinguish disease states by palpatory findings alone. One hundred subjects were examined: 22 patients with documented gastrointestinal disease, 31 patients with documented asthma (but were in remission), and 47 control subjects with a negative history for either gastrointestinal pathology or asthma. Controls were matched for appearance, age, sex, race, and weight, with the 2 groups of patients. The results showed that neither the palpating physicians nor the nonpalpating could correctly categorize the subjects as gastrointestinal patients, asthma patients, or controls. The palpating physicians did not demonstrate any increased diagnostic accuracy over the nonpalpating examiners. Reasons for these negative results are discussed, as is the issue of using appropriate control procedures in osteopathic clinical research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023256940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023256940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3583845

AN - SCOPUS:0023256940

VL - 87

SP - 296

EP - 301

JO - The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

JF - The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

SN - 0098-6151

IS - 4

ER -