A Descriptive Analysis of Traction Splint Utilization and IV Analgesia by Emergency Medical Services

Joshua Nackenson, Amado A. Baez, Jonathan P. Meizoso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Objectives Traction splinting has been the prehospital treatment of midshaft femur fracture as early as the battlefield of the First World War (1914-1918). This study is the assessment of these injuries and the utilization of a traction splint (TS) in blunt and penetrating trauma, as well as intravenous (IV) analgesia utilization by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in Miami, Florida (USA). Methods This is a retrospective study of patients who sustained a midshaft femur fracture in the absence of multiple other severe injuries or severe physiologic derangement, as defined by an injury severity score (ISS) <20 and a triage revised trauma score (T-RTS)≥10, who presented to an urban, Level 1 trauma center between September 2008 and September 2013. The EMS patient care reports were assessed for physical exam findings and treatment modality. Data were analyzed descriptively and statistical differences were assessed using odds ratios and Z-score with significance set at P≤.05. Results There were 170 patients studied in the cohort. The most common physical exam finding was a deformity +/-shortening and rotation in 136 patients (80.0%), followed by gunshot wound (GSW) in 22 patients (13.0%), pain or tenderness in four patients (2.4%), and no findings consistent with femur fracture in three patients (1.7%). The population was dichotomized between trauma type: blunt versus penetrating. Of 134 blunt trauma patients, 50 (37.0%) were immobilized in traction, and of the 36 penetrating trauma victims, one (2.7%) was immobilized in traction. Statistically significant differences were found in the application of a TS in blunt trauma when compared to penetrating trauma (OR=20.83; 95% CI, 2.77-156.8; P <.001). Intravenous analgesia was administered to treat pain in only 35 (22.0%) of the patients who had obtainable IV access. Of these patients, victims of blunt trauma were more likely to receive IV analgesia (OR=6.23; 95% CI, 1.42-27.41; P=.0067). Conclusion Although signs of femur fracture are recognized in the majority of cases of midshaft femur fracture, only 30% of patients were immobilized using a TS. Statistically significant differences were found in the utilization of a TS and IV analgesia administration in the setting of blunt trauma when compared to penetrating trauma. Nackenson J, Baez AA, Meizoso JP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)631-635
Number of pages5
JournalPrehospital and Disaster Medicine
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • EMS
  • extremity trauma
  • femur fracture
  • prehospital
  • traction splint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Descriptive Analysis of Traction Splint Utilization and IV Analgesia by Emergency Medical Services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this