A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites

Implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement

Hee Lim Won, Kyung Lee Soo, Me Wikesjö Ulf, Sic Chun Youn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few studies have evaluated interradicular anatomy for hard and soft tissue thickness. Because interradicular sites are common regions for mini-implant placement for orthodontic anchorage, the purpose of this study was to provide a guideline to indicate the best location for mini-implants as it relates to the thickness of cortical bone and soft tissue, and to the height of the attached gingival field. CT images from 15 men and 15 women (mean age 27 years, range 23-35 years) were used to evaluate the buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness from and mesial to the central incisor to the 1st molar. To record soft tissue depth at the site of assessment for cortical bone thickness, the mucosa was pierced with a #15 endodontic K-file until the attached rubber stop rested on the mucosa. The height of attached gingiva was measured at the mid-aspect of each tooth using a caliper. There were no significant differences in cortical bone thickness within interradicular sites except for the 2nd premolar/1st molar site. There were also no significant differences in soft tissue thickness within interradicular sites except for the lateral incisor/canine and 2nd premolar/1st molar sites. The height of attached gingiva was greater in the anterior compared to the posterior region and was shortest in the premolar region. Given the limits of this study, mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage may be well placed with equivalent bone-implant contact anywhere within the zone of attached gingiva up to 6 mm apical to the alveolar crest with adequate interradicular space.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)760-765
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Anatomy
Volume20
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 12 2007

Fingerprint

Orthodontics
Bicuspid
Gingiva
Incisor
Mucous Membrane
Bone and Bones
Cheek
Endodontics
Rubber
Canidae
Anatomy
Tooth
Guidelines
Cortical Bone

Keywords

  • Attached gingival height
  • Cortical bone thickness
  • Soft tissue thickness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy

Cite this

A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites : Implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement. / Won, Hee Lim; Soo, Kyung Lee; Ulf, Me Wikesjö; Youn, Sic Chun.

In: Clinical Anatomy, Vol. 20, No. 7, 12.10.2007, p. 760-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Won, Hee Lim ; Soo, Kyung Lee ; Ulf, Me Wikesjö ; Youn, Sic Chun. / A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites : Implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement. In: Clinical Anatomy. 2007 ; Vol. 20, No. 7. pp. 760-765.
@article{c92409a56dc44f7c86b0df9bc627727a,
title = "A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: Implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement",
abstract = "Few studies have evaluated interradicular anatomy for hard and soft tissue thickness. Because interradicular sites are common regions for mini-implant placement for orthodontic anchorage, the purpose of this study was to provide a guideline to indicate the best location for mini-implants as it relates to the thickness of cortical bone and soft tissue, and to the height of the attached gingival field. CT images from 15 men and 15 women (mean age 27 years, range 23-35 years) were used to evaluate the buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness from and mesial to the central incisor to the 1st molar. To record soft tissue depth at the site of assessment for cortical bone thickness, the mucosa was pierced with a #15 endodontic K-file until the attached rubber stop rested on the mucosa. The height of attached gingiva was measured at the mid-aspect of each tooth using a caliper. There were no significant differences in cortical bone thickness within interradicular sites except for the 2nd premolar/1st molar site. There were also no significant differences in soft tissue thickness within interradicular sites except for the lateral incisor/canine and 2nd premolar/1st molar sites. The height of attached gingiva was greater in the anterior compared to the posterior region and was shortest in the premolar region. Given the limits of this study, mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage may be well placed with equivalent bone-implant contact anywhere within the zone of attached gingiva up to 6 mm apical to the alveolar crest with adequate interradicular space.",
keywords = "Attached gingival height, Cortical bone thickness, Soft tissue thickness",
author = "Won, {Hee Lim} and Soo, {Kyung Lee} and Ulf, {Me Wikesj{\"o}} and Youn, {Sic Chun}",
year = "2007",
month = "10",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1002/ca.20513",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "760--765",
journal = "Clinical Anatomy",
issn = "0897-3806",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites

T2 - Implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement

AU - Won, Hee Lim

AU - Soo, Kyung Lee

AU - Ulf, Me Wikesjö

AU - Youn, Sic Chun

PY - 2007/10/12

Y1 - 2007/10/12

N2 - Few studies have evaluated interradicular anatomy for hard and soft tissue thickness. Because interradicular sites are common regions for mini-implant placement for orthodontic anchorage, the purpose of this study was to provide a guideline to indicate the best location for mini-implants as it relates to the thickness of cortical bone and soft tissue, and to the height of the attached gingival field. CT images from 15 men and 15 women (mean age 27 years, range 23-35 years) were used to evaluate the buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness from and mesial to the central incisor to the 1st molar. To record soft tissue depth at the site of assessment for cortical bone thickness, the mucosa was pierced with a #15 endodontic K-file until the attached rubber stop rested on the mucosa. The height of attached gingiva was measured at the mid-aspect of each tooth using a caliper. There were no significant differences in cortical bone thickness within interradicular sites except for the 2nd premolar/1st molar site. There were also no significant differences in soft tissue thickness within interradicular sites except for the lateral incisor/canine and 2nd premolar/1st molar sites. The height of attached gingiva was greater in the anterior compared to the posterior region and was shortest in the premolar region. Given the limits of this study, mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage may be well placed with equivalent bone-implant contact anywhere within the zone of attached gingiva up to 6 mm apical to the alveolar crest with adequate interradicular space.

AB - Few studies have evaluated interradicular anatomy for hard and soft tissue thickness. Because interradicular sites are common regions for mini-implant placement for orthodontic anchorage, the purpose of this study was to provide a guideline to indicate the best location for mini-implants as it relates to the thickness of cortical bone and soft tissue, and to the height of the attached gingival field. CT images from 15 men and 15 women (mean age 27 years, range 23-35 years) were used to evaluate the buccal interradicular cortical bone thickness from and mesial to the central incisor to the 1st molar. To record soft tissue depth at the site of assessment for cortical bone thickness, the mucosa was pierced with a #15 endodontic K-file until the attached rubber stop rested on the mucosa. The height of attached gingiva was measured at the mid-aspect of each tooth using a caliper. There were no significant differences in cortical bone thickness within interradicular sites except for the 2nd premolar/1st molar site. There were also no significant differences in soft tissue thickness within interradicular sites except for the lateral incisor/canine and 2nd premolar/1st molar sites. The height of attached gingiva was greater in the anterior compared to the posterior region and was shortest in the premolar region. Given the limits of this study, mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage may be well placed with equivalent bone-implant contact anywhere within the zone of attached gingiva up to 6 mm apical to the alveolar crest with adequate interradicular space.

KW - Attached gingival height

KW - Cortical bone thickness

KW - Soft tissue thickness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35148888575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35148888575&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ca.20513

DO - 10.1002/ca.20513

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 760

EP - 765

JO - Clinical Anatomy

JF - Clinical Anatomy

SN - 0897-3806

IS - 7

ER -