A Prospective Comparison of Ultrasound-guided and Blindly Placed Radial Arterial Catheters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Arterial cannulation for continuous blood-pressure measurement and frequent arterial-blood sampling commonly are required in critically ill patients. Objectives: To compare ultrasound (US)-guided versus traditional palpation placement of arterial lines for time to placement, number of attempts, sites used, and complications. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized interventional study at a Level 1 academic urban emergency department with an annual census of 78,000 patients. Patients were randomized to either palpation or US-guided groups. Inclusion criteria were any adult patient who required an arterial line according to the treating attending. Patients who had previous attempts at an arterial line during the visit, or who could not be randomized because of time constraints, were excluded. Enrollment was on a convenience basis, during hours worked by researchers over a six-month period. Patients in either group who had three failed attempts were rescued with the other technique for patient comfort. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and Student's t-tests. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, with 30 patients randomized to each group. Patients randomized to the US group had a shorter time required for arterial line placement (107 vs. 314 seconds; difference, 207 seconds; p = 0.0004), fewer placement attempts (1.2 vs. 2.2; difference, 1; p = 0.001), and fewer sites required for successful line placement (1.1 vs. 1.6; difference, 0.5; p = 0.001), as compared with the palpation group. Conclusions: In this study, US guidance for arterial cannulation was successful more frequently and it took less time to establish the arterial line as compared with the palpation method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1275-1279
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume13
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

Catheters
Vascular Access Devices
Palpation
Catheterization
Censuses
Critical Illness
Hospital Emergency Service
Research Personnel
Students
Blood Pressure

Keywords

  • arterial lines
  • emergency medicine
  • emergency ultrasound
  • ultrasound
  • ultrasound guided arterial line placement
  • ultrasound guided procedures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

A Prospective Comparison of Ultrasound-guided and Blindly Placed Radial Arterial Catheters. / Shiver, Stephen A; Blaivas, Michael; Lyon, Matthew L.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 12, 01.12.2006, p. 1275-1279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2dfd3f627a9a47abb986ca802425c9ac,
title = "A Prospective Comparison of Ultrasound-guided and Blindly Placed Radial Arterial Catheters",
abstract = "Background: Arterial cannulation for continuous blood-pressure measurement and frequent arterial-blood sampling commonly are required in critically ill patients. Objectives: To compare ultrasound (US)-guided versus traditional palpation placement of arterial lines for time to placement, number of attempts, sites used, and complications. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized interventional study at a Level 1 academic urban emergency department with an annual census of 78,000 patients. Patients were randomized to either palpation or US-guided groups. Inclusion criteria were any adult patient who required an arterial line according to the treating attending. Patients who had previous attempts at an arterial line during the visit, or who could not be randomized because of time constraints, were excluded. Enrollment was on a convenience basis, during hours worked by researchers over a six-month period. Patients in either group who had three failed attempts were rescued with the other technique for patient comfort. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and Student's t-tests. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, with 30 patients randomized to each group. Patients randomized to the US group had a shorter time required for arterial line placement (107 vs. 314 seconds; difference, 207 seconds; p = 0.0004), fewer placement attempts (1.2 vs. 2.2; difference, 1; p = 0.001), and fewer sites required for successful line placement (1.1 vs. 1.6; difference, 0.5; p = 0.001), as compared with the palpation group. Conclusions: In this study, US guidance for arterial cannulation was successful more frequently and it took less time to establish the arterial line as compared with the palpation method.",
keywords = "arterial lines, emergency medicine, emergency ultrasound, ultrasound, ultrasound guided arterial line placement, ultrasound guided procedures",
author = "Shiver, {Stephen A} and Michael Blaivas and Lyon, {Matthew L}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1275--1279",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Prospective Comparison of Ultrasound-guided and Blindly Placed Radial Arterial Catheters

AU - Shiver, Stephen A

AU - Blaivas, Michael

AU - Lyon, Matthew L

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - Background: Arterial cannulation for continuous blood-pressure measurement and frequent arterial-blood sampling commonly are required in critically ill patients. Objectives: To compare ultrasound (US)-guided versus traditional palpation placement of arterial lines for time to placement, number of attempts, sites used, and complications. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized interventional study at a Level 1 academic urban emergency department with an annual census of 78,000 patients. Patients were randomized to either palpation or US-guided groups. Inclusion criteria were any adult patient who required an arterial line according to the treating attending. Patients who had previous attempts at an arterial line during the visit, or who could not be randomized because of time constraints, were excluded. Enrollment was on a convenience basis, during hours worked by researchers over a six-month period. Patients in either group who had three failed attempts were rescued with the other technique for patient comfort. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and Student's t-tests. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, with 30 patients randomized to each group. Patients randomized to the US group had a shorter time required for arterial line placement (107 vs. 314 seconds; difference, 207 seconds; p = 0.0004), fewer placement attempts (1.2 vs. 2.2; difference, 1; p = 0.001), and fewer sites required for successful line placement (1.1 vs. 1.6; difference, 0.5; p = 0.001), as compared with the palpation group. Conclusions: In this study, US guidance for arterial cannulation was successful more frequently and it took less time to establish the arterial line as compared with the palpation method.

AB - Background: Arterial cannulation for continuous blood-pressure measurement and frequent arterial-blood sampling commonly are required in critically ill patients. Objectives: To compare ultrasound (US)-guided versus traditional palpation placement of arterial lines for time to placement, number of attempts, sites used, and complications. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized interventional study at a Level 1 academic urban emergency department with an annual census of 78,000 patients. Patients were randomized to either palpation or US-guided groups. Inclusion criteria were any adult patient who required an arterial line according to the treating attending. Patients who had previous attempts at an arterial line during the visit, or who could not be randomized because of time constraints, were excluded. Enrollment was on a convenience basis, during hours worked by researchers over a six-month period. Patients in either group who had three failed attempts were rescued with the other technique for patient comfort. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney, and Student's t-tests. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, with 30 patients randomized to each group. Patients randomized to the US group had a shorter time required for arterial line placement (107 vs. 314 seconds; difference, 207 seconds; p = 0.0004), fewer placement attempts (1.2 vs. 2.2; difference, 1; p = 0.001), and fewer sites required for successful line placement (1.1 vs. 1.6; difference, 0.5; p = 0.001), as compared with the palpation group. Conclusions: In this study, US guidance for arterial cannulation was successful more frequently and it took less time to establish the arterial line as compared with the palpation method.

KW - arterial lines

KW - emergency medicine

KW - emergency ultrasound

KW - ultrasound

KW - ultrasound guided arterial line placement

KW - ultrasound guided procedures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751221585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33751221585&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.015

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.015

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1275

EP - 1279

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 12

ER -