A prospective, randomized comparison of traditional and laparoscopic inguinal exploration in children

David A. Rogers, Robyn M Hatley, Charles Howell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

The indications for murine exploration of the asymptomatic contralateral groin during pediatric herniorrhaphy remain controversial. Laparoscopy through the open hernia sac has been described as an alternative to this traditional approach and appears to offer some advantages. In deciding whether this technique should be introduced into our clinical practice, we sought to discover whether there was a significant time difference between these two methods and if there were unique complications associated with this approach. We elected to answer this question in a prospective, randomized study. A total of 18 patients completed the study. There were no significant complications in either group. The average total surgical procedure time in the laparoscopy group was 47.5 minutes versus 41 minutes in the traditional group, which is not a statistically significant difference. We conclude from this prospective, randomized pilot study that laparoscopic exploration can be introduced into a pediatric surgical practice without a significant time penalty, and we currently offer it as a reasonable and safe alternative to our patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-121
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume64
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective, randomized comparison of traditional and laparoscopic inguinal exploration in children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this