A prospective, randomized trial of acticoat versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of partial-thickness burns

Which method is less painful?

Robin Prater Varas, Terence OKeeffe, Nicholas Namias, Louis R. Pizano, Olga Delia Quintana, Marlene Herrero Tellachea, Qammar Rashid, C. Gillon Ward

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite recent improvements in analgesia, pain control during dressing changes continues to be a major challenge in patients with burns. We investigated two different dressing modalities to compare how much pain the patient experienced during and after the dressing change. Patients with partial-thickness burns that required only topical wound care were assigned randomly to treatment with Acticoat® (Smith and Nephew USA, Largo, FL) or silver sulfadiazine (AgSD). The outcome variable was pain during wound care, which was measured using visual analog pain scores. The mean visual analog pain scores for the wounds treated with Acticoat® or AgSD wounds were 3.2 and 7.9, respectively (P < .0001; paired Student's t-test). In 41 of the 47 paired pain score observations, the pain in the wound treated with AgSD was perceived as greater than in the wound treated with Acticoat®. Burn wound care with Acticoat® is less painful than burn wound care with AgSD in patients with selected partial-thickness burns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)344-347
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Silver Sulfadiazine
Burns
Pain
Wounds and Injuries
Bandages
Therapeutics
Acticoat
Analgesia
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Nursing(all)
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)

Cite this

A prospective, randomized trial of acticoat versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of partial-thickness burns : Which method is less painful? / Varas, Robin Prater; OKeeffe, Terence; Namias, Nicholas; Pizano, Louis R.; Quintana, Olga Delia; Tellachea, Marlene Herrero; Rashid, Qammar; Ward, C. Gillon.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.07.2005, p. 344-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Varas, Robin Prater ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Namias, Nicholas ; Pizano, Louis R. ; Quintana, Olga Delia ; Tellachea, Marlene Herrero ; Rashid, Qammar ; Ward, C. Gillon. / A prospective, randomized trial of acticoat versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of partial-thickness burns : Which method is less painful?. In: Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation. 2005 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 344-347.
@article{3cf6de35e909443f90f292a088ca3491,
title = "A prospective, randomized trial of acticoat versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of partial-thickness burns: Which method is less painful?",
abstract = "Despite recent improvements in analgesia, pain control during dressing changes continues to be a major challenge in patients with burns. We investigated two different dressing modalities to compare how much pain the patient experienced during and after the dressing change. Patients with partial-thickness burns that required only topical wound care were assigned randomly to treatment with Acticoat{\circledR} (Smith and Nephew USA, Largo, FL) or silver sulfadiazine (AgSD). The outcome variable was pain during wound care, which was measured using visual analog pain scores. The mean visual analog pain scores for the wounds treated with Acticoat{\circledR} or AgSD wounds were 3.2 and 7.9, respectively (P < .0001; paired Student's t-test). In 41 of the 47 paired pain score observations, the pain in the wound treated with AgSD was perceived as greater than in the wound treated with Acticoat{\circledR}. Burn wound care with Acticoat{\circledR} is less painful than burn wound care with AgSD in patients with selected partial-thickness burns.",
author = "Varas, {Robin Prater} and Terence OKeeffe and Nicholas Namias and Pizano, {Louis R.} and Quintana, {Olga Delia} and Tellachea, {Marlene Herrero} and Qammar Rashid and Ward, {C. Gillon}",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.BCR.0000170119.87879.CA",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "344--347",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective, randomized trial of acticoat versus silver sulfadiazine in the treatment of partial-thickness burns

T2 - Which method is less painful?

AU - Varas, Robin Prater

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Namias, Nicholas

AU - Pizano, Louis R.

AU - Quintana, Olga Delia

AU - Tellachea, Marlene Herrero

AU - Rashid, Qammar

AU - Ward, C. Gillon

PY - 2005/7/1

Y1 - 2005/7/1

N2 - Despite recent improvements in analgesia, pain control during dressing changes continues to be a major challenge in patients with burns. We investigated two different dressing modalities to compare how much pain the patient experienced during and after the dressing change. Patients with partial-thickness burns that required only topical wound care were assigned randomly to treatment with Acticoat® (Smith and Nephew USA, Largo, FL) or silver sulfadiazine (AgSD). The outcome variable was pain during wound care, which was measured using visual analog pain scores. The mean visual analog pain scores for the wounds treated with Acticoat® or AgSD wounds were 3.2 and 7.9, respectively (P < .0001; paired Student's t-test). In 41 of the 47 paired pain score observations, the pain in the wound treated with AgSD was perceived as greater than in the wound treated with Acticoat®. Burn wound care with Acticoat® is less painful than burn wound care with AgSD in patients with selected partial-thickness burns.

AB - Despite recent improvements in analgesia, pain control during dressing changes continues to be a major challenge in patients with burns. We investigated two different dressing modalities to compare how much pain the patient experienced during and after the dressing change. Patients with partial-thickness burns that required only topical wound care were assigned randomly to treatment with Acticoat® (Smith and Nephew USA, Largo, FL) or silver sulfadiazine (AgSD). The outcome variable was pain during wound care, which was measured using visual analog pain scores. The mean visual analog pain scores for the wounds treated with Acticoat® or AgSD wounds were 3.2 and 7.9, respectively (P < .0001; paired Student's t-test). In 41 of the 47 paired pain score observations, the pain in the wound treated with AgSD was perceived as greater than in the wound treated with Acticoat®. Burn wound care with Acticoat® is less painful than burn wound care with AgSD in patients with selected partial-thickness burns.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23044510858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=23044510858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.BCR.0000170119.87879.CA

DO - 10.1097/01.BCR.0000170119.87879.CA

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 344

EP - 347

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 4

ER -