A Systematic Review of High Quality Diagnostic Tests for Chagas Disease

Anna M. Afonso, Mark H. Ebell, Rick L. Tarleton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is significant heterogeneity in reported sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic serological assays for Chagas disease, as might be expected from studies that vary widely according to setting, research design, antigens employed, and reference standard. The purpose of this study is to summarize the reported accuracy of serological assays and to identify sources of heterogeneity including quality of research design. To avoid associated spectrum bias, our analysis was limited to cohort studies. Methods: We completed a search of PubMed, a bibliographic review of potentially relevant articles, and a review of articles identified by a study author involved in this area of research. Studies were limited to prospective cohort studies of adults published since 1985. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were pooled using a Der Simonian Laird Random Effects Model. A subgroup analysis and meta regression were employed to identify sources of heterogeneity. The QUADAS tool was used to assess quality of included studies and Begg's funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. Results: Eighteen studies and 61 assays were included in the final analysis. Significant heterogeneity was found in all pre-determined subgroups. Overall sensitivity was 90% (95% CI: 89%-91%) and overall specificity was 98% (95% CI: 98%-98%). Conclusion: Sensitivity and specificity of serological assays for the diagnosis of Chagas disease appear less accurate than previously thought. Suggestions to improve the accuracy of reporting include the enrollment of patients in a prospective manner, double blinding, and providing an explicit method of addressing subjects that have an indeterminate diagnosis by either the reference standard or index test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere1881
JournalPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Volume6
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chagas Disease
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Cohort Studies
Research Design
Sensitivity and Specificity
Publication Bias
PubMed
Regression Analysis
Prospective Studies
Antigens
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

A Systematic Review of High Quality Diagnostic Tests for Chagas Disease. / Afonso, Anna M.; Ebell, Mark H.; Tarleton, Rick L.

In: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol. 6, No. 11, e1881, 01.11.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Afonso, Anna M. ; Ebell, Mark H. ; Tarleton, Rick L. / A Systematic Review of High Quality Diagnostic Tests for Chagas Disease. In: PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2012 ; Vol. 6, No. 11.
@article{4fd5471ea48b475e96229b7a76c11e10,
title = "A Systematic Review of High Quality Diagnostic Tests for Chagas Disease",
abstract = "Background: There is significant heterogeneity in reported sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic serological assays for Chagas disease, as might be expected from studies that vary widely according to setting, research design, antigens employed, and reference standard. The purpose of this study is to summarize the reported accuracy of serological assays and to identify sources of heterogeneity including quality of research design. To avoid associated spectrum bias, our analysis was limited to cohort studies. Methods: We completed a search of PubMed, a bibliographic review of potentially relevant articles, and a review of articles identified by a study author involved in this area of research. Studies were limited to prospective cohort studies of adults published since 1985. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were pooled using a Der Simonian Laird Random Effects Model. A subgroup analysis and meta regression were employed to identify sources of heterogeneity. The QUADAS tool was used to assess quality of included studies and Begg's funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. Results: Eighteen studies and 61 assays were included in the final analysis. Significant heterogeneity was found in all pre-determined subgroups. Overall sensitivity was 90{\%} (95{\%} CI: 89{\%}-91{\%}) and overall specificity was 98{\%} (95{\%} CI: 98{\%}-98{\%}). Conclusion: Sensitivity and specificity of serological assays for the diagnosis of Chagas disease appear less accurate than previously thought. Suggestions to improve the accuracy of reporting include the enrollment of patients in a prospective manner, double blinding, and providing an explicit method of addressing subjects that have an indeterminate diagnosis by either the reference standard or index test.",
author = "Afonso, {Anna M.} and Ebell, {Mark H.} and Tarleton, {Rick L.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pntd.0001881",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases",
issn = "1935-2727",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Systematic Review of High Quality Diagnostic Tests for Chagas Disease

AU - Afonso, Anna M.

AU - Ebell, Mark H.

AU - Tarleton, Rick L.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Background: There is significant heterogeneity in reported sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic serological assays for Chagas disease, as might be expected from studies that vary widely according to setting, research design, antigens employed, and reference standard. The purpose of this study is to summarize the reported accuracy of serological assays and to identify sources of heterogeneity including quality of research design. To avoid associated spectrum bias, our analysis was limited to cohort studies. Methods: We completed a search of PubMed, a bibliographic review of potentially relevant articles, and a review of articles identified by a study author involved in this area of research. Studies were limited to prospective cohort studies of adults published since 1985. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were pooled using a Der Simonian Laird Random Effects Model. A subgroup analysis and meta regression were employed to identify sources of heterogeneity. The QUADAS tool was used to assess quality of included studies and Begg's funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. Results: Eighteen studies and 61 assays were included in the final analysis. Significant heterogeneity was found in all pre-determined subgroups. Overall sensitivity was 90% (95% CI: 89%-91%) and overall specificity was 98% (95% CI: 98%-98%). Conclusion: Sensitivity and specificity of serological assays for the diagnosis of Chagas disease appear less accurate than previously thought. Suggestions to improve the accuracy of reporting include the enrollment of patients in a prospective manner, double blinding, and providing an explicit method of addressing subjects that have an indeterminate diagnosis by either the reference standard or index test.

AB - Background: There is significant heterogeneity in reported sensitivities and specificities of diagnostic serological assays for Chagas disease, as might be expected from studies that vary widely according to setting, research design, antigens employed, and reference standard. The purpose of this study is to summarize the reported accuracy of serological assays and to identify sources of heterogeneity including quality of research design. To avoid associated spectrum bias, our analysis was limited to cohort studies. Methods: We completed a search of PubMed, a bibliographic review of potentially relevant articles, and a review of articles identified by a study author involved in this area of research. Studies were limited to prospective cohort studies of adults published since 1985. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were pooled using a Der Simonian Laird Random Effects Model. A subgroup analysis and meta regression were employed to identify sources of heterogeneity. The QUADAS tool was used to assess quality of included studies and Begg's funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. Results: Eighteen studies and 61 assays were included in the final analysis. Significant heterogeneity was found in all pre-determined subgroups. Overall sensitivity was 90% (95% CI: 89%-91%) and overall specificity was 98% (95% CI: 98%-98%). Conclusion: Sensitivity and specificity of serological assays for the diagnosis of Chagas disease appear less accurate than previously thought. Suggestions to improve the accuracy of reporting include the enrollment of patients in a prospective manner, double blinding, and providing an explicit method of addressing subjects that have an indeterminate diagnosis by either the reference standard or index test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870755865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870755865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001881

DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001881

M3 - Review article

VL - 6

JO - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

JF - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases

SN - 1935-2727

IS - 11

M1 - e1881

ER -