A systems model for adaptation to somatic distress among cancer survivors

Mark R. Somerfield, Michael Edward Stefanek, Thomas J. Smith, Jennifer J. Padberg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Applied coping research has generally failed to fulfill its goal of providing an empirical basis for clinical interventions, and research on coping with cancer is no exception. This can be attributed in large measure to the wide gap between coping theory and coping research. Theories of stress and adaptation are complex systems formulations that present conceptual and methodological challenges and thus make testing comprehensive models difficult. The present paper reviews arguments for a microanalytic strategy through which researchers can increase coverage of relevant variables from broad systems models of stress and coping by concentrating their resources on selected, high-frequency, high-stress problems. The utility of this approach for formulating problem-specific systems models is illustrated using the example of coping with somatic distress among cancer survivors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-343
Number of pages10
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research
Neoplasms
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Oncology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A systems model for adaptation to somatic distress among cancer survivors. / Somerfield, Mark R.; Stefanek, Michael Edward; Smith, Thomas J.; Padberg, Jennifer J.

In: Psycho-Oncology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.07.1999, p. 334-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Somerfield, Mark R. ; Stefanek, Michael Edward ; Smith, Thomas J. ; Padberg, Jennifer J. / A systems model for adaptation to somatic distress among cancer survivors. In: Psycho-Oncology. 1999 ; Vol. 8, No. 4. pp. 334-343.
@article{4c5fe85bbffd44a4bacb3889693162fb,
title = "A systems model for adaptation to somatic distress among cancer survivors",
abstract = "Applied coping research has generally failed to fulfill its goal of providing an empirical basis for clinical interventions, and research on coping with cancer is no exception. This can be attributed in large measure to the wide gap between coping theory and coping research. Theories of stress and adaptation are complex systems formulations that present conceptual and methodological challenges and thus make testing comprehensive models difficult. The present paper reviews arguments for a microanalytic strategy through which researchers can increase coverage of relevant variables from broad systems models of stress and coping by concentrating their resources on selected, high-frequency, high-stress problems. The utility of this approach for formulating problem-specific systems models is illustrated using the example of coping with somatic distress among cancer survivors.",
author = "Somerfield, {Mark R.} and Stefanek, {Michael Edward} and Smith, {Thomas J.} and Padberg, {Jennifer J.}",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199907/08)8:4<334::AID-PON392>3.0.CO;2-E",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "334--343",
journal = "Psycho-Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systems model for adaptation to somatic distress among cancer survivors

AU - Somerfield, Mark R.

AU - Stefanek, Michael Edward

AU - Smith, Thomas J.

AU - Padberg, Jennifer J.

PY - 1999/7/1

Y1 - 1999/7/1

N2 - Applied coping research has generally failed to fulfill its goal of providing an empirical basis for clinical interventions, and research on coping with cancer is no exception. This can be attributed in large measure to the wide gap between coping theory and coping research. Theories of stress and adaptation are complex systems formulations that present conceptual and methodological challenges and thus make testing comprehensive models difficult. The present paper reviews arguments for a microanalytic strategy through which researchers can increase coverage of relevant variables from broad systems models of stress and coping by concentrating their resources on selected, high-frequency, high-stress problems. The utility of this approach for formulating problem-specific systems models is illustrated using the example of coping with somatic distress among cancer survivors.

AB - Applied coping research has generally failed to fulfill its goal of providing an empirical basis for clinical interventions, and research on coping with cancer is no exception. This can be attributed in large measure to the wide gap between coping theory and coping research. Theories of stress and adaptation are complex systems formulations that present conceptual and methodological challenges and thus make testing comprehensive models difficult. The present paper reviews arguments for a microanalytic strategy through which researchers can increase coverage of relevant variables from broad systems models of stress and coping by concentrating their resources on selected, high-frequency, high-stress problems. The utility of this approach for formulating problem-specific systems models is illustrated using the example of coping with somatic distress among cancer survivors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032868242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032868242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199907/08)8:4<334::AID-PON392>3.0.CO;2-E

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199907/08)8:4<334::AID-PON392>3.0.CO;2-E

M3 - Review article

C2 - 10474851

AN - SCOPUS:0032868242

VL - 8

SP - 334

EP - 343

JO - Psycho-Oncology

JF - Psycho-Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 4

ER -