Agenda setting in emergent R&D policy subsystems

Examining discourse effects of the 21st century nanotechnology research and development act

Derrick Anderson, Catherine P Slade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature on government responsiveness to societal issues is extensive but provides a mixed assessment of effectiveness. We examine this issue in the case of policy addressing effective and safe management of research and development in the emerging field of nanotechnology. Specifically, we examine the agenda setting effects of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (the Act), a piece of legislation designed to be implemented by a network of actors in the nanotechnology research and development policy subsystem. We adopt a public values lens in our examination of discourse related to societal concerns. Policy documents from Congress, an agency, and federal funding recipients are examined. Findings suggest a narrowing of public values discourse around more specific societal concerns in the documents crafted after the Act was passed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-463
Number of pages17
JournalReview of Policy Research
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2013

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
twenty first century
subsystem
research and development
act
discourse
research policy
development policy
Values
legislation
recipient
funding
examination
management
effect
policy
public
document

Keywords

  • Governance of emerging technology
  • Innovation
  • Nanotechnology
  • Public policy agenda setting
  • Research and development policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{827a1ff53504465394f58fc1ec0b189d,
title = "Agenda setting in emergent R&D policy subsystems: Examining discourse effects of the 21st century nanotechnology research and development act",
abstract = "The literature on government responsiveness to societal issues is extensive but provides a mixed assessment of effectiveness. We examine this issue in the case of policy addressing effective and safe management of research and development in the emerging field of nanotechnology. Specifically, we examine the agenda setting effects of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (the Act), a piece of legislation designed to be implemented by a network of actors in the nanotechnology research and development policy subsystem. We adopt a public values lens in our examination of discourse related to societal concerns. Policy documents from Congress, an agency, and federal funding recipients are examined. Findings suggest a narrowing of public values discourse around more specific societal concerns in the documents crafted after the Act was passed.",
keywords = "Governance of emerging technology, Innovation, Nanotechnology, Public policy agenda setting, Research and development policy",
author = "Derrick Anderson and Slade, {Catherine P}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ropr.12033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "447--463",
journal = "Review of Policy Research",
issn = "1541-132X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Agenda setting in emergent R&D policy subsystems

T2 - Examining discourse effects of the 21st century nanotechnology research and development act

AU - Anderson, Derrick

AU - Slade, Catherine P

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - The literature on government responsiveness to societal issues is extensive but provides a mixed assessment of effectiveness. We examine this issue in the case of policy addressing effective and safe management of research and development in the emerging field of nanotechnology. Specifically, we examine the agenda setting effects of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (the Act), a piece of legislation designed to be implemented by a network of actors in the nanotechnology research and development policy subsystem. We adopt a public values lens in our examination of discourse related to societal concerns. Policy documents from Congress, an agency, and federal funding recipients are examined. Findings suggest a narrowing of public values discourse around more specific societal concerns in the documents crafted after the Act was passed.

AB - The literature on government responsiveness to societal issues is extensive but provides a mixed assessment of effectiveness. We examine this issue in the case of policy addressing effective and safe management of research and development in the emerging field of nanotechnology. Specifically, we examine the agenda setting effects of the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (the Act), a piece of legislation designed to be implemented by a network of actors in the nanotechnology research and development policy subsystem. We adopt a public values lens in our examination of discourse related to societal concerns. Policy documents from Congress, an agency, and federal funding recipients are examined. Findings suggest a narrowing of public values discourse around more specific societal concerns in the documents crafted after the Act was passed.

KW - Governance of emerging technology

KW - Innovation

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Public policy agenda setting

KW - Research and development policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885762180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885762180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ropr.12033

DO - 10.1111/ropr.12033

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 447

EP - 463

JO - Review of Policy Research

JF - Review of Policy Research

SN - 1541-132X

IS - 5

ER -