Alveolar bone formation at dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration and xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix

Kyoo Sung Cho, Seong Ho Choi, Kyung Ho Han, Jung Kiu Chai, Ulf M E Wikesjö, Chong Kwan Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study evaluated rate and extent of alveolar bone formation in dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implantation of xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix (xDBM). A total of 16 titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) and 16 hydroxyapatite-coated (HA) titanium cylinder implants were inserted in 4 mongrel dogs following extraction of the mandibular premolar teeth. Four implant sites per jaw quadrant (2 TPS and 2 HA implant sites) were prepared into extraction sockets in each dog. Buccal alveolar bone was removed to create 3 × 5 mm dehiscence defects. Two jaw quadrants in separate animals received GBR, GBR+xDBM, xDBM (control), or gingival flap surgery alone (GFS; control). Thus, four conditions were available for each implant type (TPS or HA): GBR, GBR+xDBM; xDBM and GFS. The animals received fluorescent bone labels to allow observations of rate and extent of bone formation. Animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks postsurgery and block sections were harvested for histologic analysis. There were no apparent histologic differences between TPS and HA implant defects. GBR and GBR+xDBM resulted in almost complete bone closure of the dental implant dehiscence defect. Rate of bone formation appeared higher following GBR alone. Extent of bone formation appeared somewhat greater following GBR+xDBM; however, delayed. xDBM alone did not adequately resolve the bony defect. In conclusion, GBR results in rapid, clinically relevant bone closure of dental implant dehiscence defects. Adjunctive implantation of xDBM does not appear to significantly improve the healing response in the model used.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-428
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Bone Matrix
Bone Regeneration
Dental Implants
Osteogenesis
Titanium
Durapatite
Jaw
Bone and Bones
Dogs
Zygoma
Bicuspid
Tooth

Keywords

  • Bone regeneration
  • Dehiscence defect
  • Dental implant
  • Guided bone regeneration
  • Xenogeneic demineralized freeze dried bone matrix

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Alveolar bone formation at dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration and xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix. / Cho, Kyoo Sung; Choi, Seong Ho; Han, Kyung Ho; Chai, Jung Kiu; Wikesjö, Ulf M E; Kim, Chong Kwan.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 9, No. 6, 01.01.1998, p. 419-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cho, Kyoo Sung ; Choi, Seong Ho ; Han, Kyung Ho ; Chai, Jung Kiu ; Wikesjö, Ulf M E ; Kim, Chong Kwan. / Alveolar bone formation at dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration and xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix. In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1998 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 419-428.
@article{4a342f5c72384c12b668f398911bab62,
title = "Alveolar bone formation at dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration and xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix",
abstract = "The present study evaluated rate and extent of alveolar bone formation in dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implantation of xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix (xDBM). A total of 16 titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) and 16 hydroxyapatite-coated (HA) titanium cylinder implants were inserted in 4 mongrel dogs following extraction of the mandibular premolar teeth. Four implant sites per jaw quadrant (2 TPS and 2 HA implant sites) were prepared into extraction sockets in each dog. Buccal alveolar bone was removed to create 3 × 5 mm dehiscence defects. Two jaw quadrants in separate animals received GBR, GBR+xDBM, xDBM (control), or gingival flap surgery alone (GFS; control). Thus, four conditions were available for each implant type (TPS or HA): GBR, GBR+xDBM; xDBM and GFS. The animals received fluorescent bone labels to allow observations of rate and extent of bone formation. Animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks postsurgery and block sections were harvested for histologic analysis. There were no apparent histologic differences between TPS and HA implant defects. GBR and GBR+xDBM resulted in almost complete bone closure of the dental implant dehiscence defect. Rate of bone formation appeared higher following GBR alone. Extent of bone formation appeared somewhat greater following GBR+xDBM; however, delayed. xDBM alone did not adequately resolve the bony defect. In conclusion, GBR results in rapid, clinically relevant bone closure of dental implant dehiscence defects. Adjunctive implantation of xDBM does not appear to significantly improve the healing response in the model used.",
keywords = "Bone regeneration, Dehiscence defect, Dental implant, Guided bone regeneration, Xenogeneic demineralized freeze dried bone matrix",
author = "Cho, {Kyoo Sung} and Choi, {Seong Ho} and Han, {Kyung Ho} and Chai, {Jung Kiu} and Wikesj{\"o}, {Ulf M E} and Kim, {Chong Kwan}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090607.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "419--428",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alveolar bone formation at dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration and xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix

AU - Cho, Kyoo Sung

AU - Choi, Seong Ho

AU - Han, Kyung Ho

AU - Chai, Jung Kiu

AU - Wikesjö, Ulf M E

AU - Kim, Chong Kwan

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - The present study evaluated rate and extent of alveolar bone formation in dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implantation of xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix (xDBM). A total of 16 titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) and 16 hydroxyapatite-coated (HA) titanium cylinder implants were inserted in 4 mongrel dogs following extraction of the mandibular premolar teeth. Four implant sites per jaw quadrant (2 TPS and 2 HA implant sites) were prepared into extraction sockets in each dog. Buccal alveolar bone was removed to create 3 × 5 mm dehiscence defects. Two jaw quadrants in separate animals received GBR, GBR+xDBM, xDBM (control), or gingival flap surgery alone (GFS; control). Thus, four conditions were available for each implant type (TPS or HA): GBR, GBR+xDBM; xDBM and GFS. The animals received fluorescent bone labels to allow observations of rate and extent of bone formation. Animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks postsurgery and block sections were harvested for histologic analysis. There were no apparent histologic differences between TPS and HA implant defects. GBR and GBR+xDBM resulted in almost complete bone closure of the dental implant dehiscence defect. Rate of bone formation appeared higher following GBR alone. Extent of bone formation appeared somewhat greater following GBR+xDBM; however, delayed. xDBM alone did not adequately resolve the bony defect. In conclusion, GBR results in rapid, clinically relevant bone closure of dental implant dehiscence defects. Adjunctive implantation of xDBM does not appear to significantly improve the healing response in the model used.

AB - The present study evaluated rate and extent of alveolar bone formation in dental implant dehiscence defects following guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implantation of xenogeneic freeze-dried demineralized bone matrix (xDBM). A total of 16 titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) and 16 hydroxyapatite-coated (HA) titanium cylinder implants were inserted in 4 mongrel dogs following extraction of the mandibular premolar teeth. Four implant sites per jaw quadrant (2 TPS and 2 HA implant sites) were prepared into extraction sockets in each dog. Buccal alveolar bone was removed to create 3 × 5 mm dehiscence defects. Two jaw quadrants in separate animals received GBR, GBR+xDBM, xDBM (control), or gingival flap surgery alone (GFS; control). Thus, four conditions were available for each implant type (TPS or HA): GBR, GBR+xDBM; xDBM and GFS. The animals received fluorescent bone labels to allow observations of rate and extent of bone formation. Animals were sacrificed at 12 weeks postsurgery and block sections were harvested for histologic analysis. There were no apparent histologic differences between TPS and HA implant defects. GBR and GBR+xDBM resulted in almost complete bone closure of the dental implant dehiscence defect. Rate of bone formation appeared higher following GBR alone. Extent of bone formation appeared somewhat greater following GBR+xDBM; however, delayed. xDBM alone did not adequately resolve the bony defect. In conclusion, GBR results in rapid, clinically relevant bone closure of dental implant dehiscence defects. Adjunctive implantation of xDBM does not appear to significantly improve the healing response in the model used.

KW - Bone regeneration

KW - Dehiscence defect

KW - Dental implant

KW - Guided bone regeneration

KW - Xenogeneic demineralized freeze dried bone matrix

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032229443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032229443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090607.x

DO - 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090607.x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 419

EP - 428

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 6

ER -