An additional analysis of estimation techniques for the degree of financial leverage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study compares three different empirical proxies for the financial leverage component of a systematic risk-composition model employed in prior financial research. We consider one static accounting measure and two elasticity-based measures. We find that the traditional static accounting measure of financial leverage provides statistically different estimates of financial leverage when compared to estimates from elasticity-based measures of the degree of financial leverage. The findings are important because the elasticity-based models for the degree of financial leverage have clear theoretical links to market-based models of systematic risk, while the static accounting measure of financial leverage does not. Practitioners and researchers should carefully consider why they are estimating financial leverage and choose the appropriate method for doing so given the goals and potential consequences for biased estimation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)220-231
Number of pages12
JournalReview of Financial Economics
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 2018

Fingerprint

Financial leverage
Elasticity
Systematic risk

Keywords

  • DFL
  • Degree of financial leverage
  • Empirical measurement
  • Financial structure
  • Systematic risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

An additional analysis of estimation techniques for the degree of financial leverage. / Stelk, Steven; Park, Sang H; Medcalfe, Simon K; Dugan, Michael Timothy.

In: Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 36, No. 3, 02.09.2018, p. 220-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ec73b68f6384e708fafd5209a614854,
title = "An additional analysis of estimation techniques for the degree of financial leverage",
abstract = "This study compares three different empirical proxies for the financial leverage component of a systematic risk-composition model employed in prior financial research. We consider one static accounting measure and two elasticity-based measures. We find that the traditional static accounting measure of financial leverage provides statistically different estimates of financial leverage when compared to estimates from elasticity-based measures of the degree of financial leverage. The findings are important because the elasticity-based models for the degree of financial leverage have clear theoretical links to market-based models of systematic risk, while the static accounting measure of financial leverage does not. Practitioners and researchers should carefully consider why they are estimating financial leverage and choose the appropriate method for doing so given the goals and potential consequences for biased estimation.",
keywords = "DFL, Degree of financial leverage, Empirical measurement, Financial structure, Systematic risk",
author = "Steven Stelk and Park, {Sang H} and Medcalfe, {Simon K} and Dugan, {Michael Timothy}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.rfe.2017.03.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "220--231",
journal = "Review of Financial Economics",
issn = "1058-3300",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An additional analysis of estimation techniques for the degree of financial leverage

AU - Stelk, Steven

AU - Park, Sang H

AU - Medcalfe, Simon K

AU - Dugan, Michael Timothy

PY - 2018/9/2

Y1 - 2018/9/2

N2 - This study compares three different empirical proxies for the financial leverage component of a systematic risk-composition model employed in prior financial research. We consider one static accounting measure and two elasticity-based measures. We find that the traditional static accounting measure of financial leverage provides statistically different estimates of financial leverage when compared to estimates from elasticity-based measures of the degree of financial leverage. The findings are important because the elasticity-based models for the degree of financial leverage have clear theoretical links to market-based models of systematic risk, while the static accounting measure of financial leverage does not. Practitioners and researchers should carefully consider why they are estimating financial leverage and choose the appropriate method for doing so given the goals and potential consequences for biased estimation.

AB - This study compares three different empirical proxies for the financial leverage component of a systematic risk-composition model employed in prior financial research. We consider one static accounting measure and two elasticity-based measures. We find that the traditional static accounting measure of financial leverage provides statistically different estimates of financial leverage when compared to estimates from elasticity-based measures of the degree of financial leverage. The findings are important because the elasticity-based models for the degree of financial leverage have clear theoretical links to market-based models of systematic risk, while the static accounting measure of financial leverage does not. Practitioners and researchers should carefully consider why they are estimating financial leverage and choose the appropriate method for doing so given the goals and potential consequences for biased estimation.

KW - DFL

KW - Degree of financial leverage

KW - Empirical measurement

KW - Financial structure

KW - Systematic risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017361875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017361875&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rfe.2017.03.005

DO - 10.1016/j.rfe.2017.03.005

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 220

EP - 231

JO - Review of Financial Economics

JF - Review of Financial Economics

SN - 1058-3300

IS - 3

ER -