An assessment of survey measures used across key epidemiologic studies of United States Gulf War i Era Veterans

Rebecca B. McNeil, Catherine M. Thomas, Steven Scott Coughlin, Elizabeth Hauser, Grant D. Huang, Karen M. Goldstein, Marcus R. Johnson, Tyra Dunn-Thomas, Dawn T. Provenzale

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past two decades, 12 large epidemiologic studies and 2 registries have focused on U.S. veterans of the 1990-1991 Gulf War Era. We conducted a review of these studies' research tools to identify existing gaps and overlaps of efforts to date, and to advance development of the next generation of Gulf War Era survey tools. Overall, we found that many of the studies used similar instruments. Questions regarding exposures were more similar across studies than other domains, while neurocognitive and psychological tools were the most variable. Many studies focused on self-reported survey results, with a range of validation practices. However, physical exams, biomedical assessments, and specimen storage were not common. This review suggests that while research may be able to pool data from past surveys, future surveys need to consider how their design can yield data comparable with previous surveys. Additionally, data that incorporate recent technologies in specimen and genetic analyses would greatly enhance such survey data. When combined with existing data on deployment-related exposures and post-deployment health conditions, longitudinal follow-up of existing studies within this collaborative framework could represent an important step toward improving the health of veterans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number4
JournalEnvironmental Health: A Global Access Science Source
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2013

Fingerprint

Gulf War
Veterans
Epidemiologic Studies
Veterans Health
Research
Registries
Surveys and Questionnaires
Psychology
Technology
Health

Keywords

  • Blood banks
  • Persian Gulf War 1991
  • Survey methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

An assessment of survey measures used across key epidemiologic studies of United States Gulf War i Era Veterans. / McNeil, Rebecca B.; Thomas, Catherine M.; Coughlin, Steven Scott; Hauser, Elizabeth; Huang, Grant D.; Goldstein, Karen M.; Johnson, Marcus R.; Dunn-Thomas, Tyra; Provenzale, Dawn T.

In: Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, Vol. 12, No. 1, 4, 15.03.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

McNeil, Rebecca B. ; Thomas, Catherine M. ; Coughlin, Steven Scott ; Hauser, Elizabeth ; Huang, Grant D. ; Goldstein, Karen M. ; Johnson, Marcus R. ; Dunn-Thomas, Tyra ; Provenzale, Dawn T. / An assessment of survey measures used across key epidemiologic studies of United States Gulf War i Era Veterans. In: Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source. 2013 ; Vol. 12, No. 1.
@article{6643179fb851439bbac595b920fb41c6,
title = "An assessment of survey measures used across key epidemiologic studies of United States Gulf War i Era Veterans",
abstract = "Over the past two decades, 12 large epidemiologic studies and 2 registries have focused on U.S. veterans of the 1990-1991 Gulf War Era. We conducted a review of these studies' research tools to identify existing gaps and overlaps of efforts to date, and to advance development of the next generation of Gulf War Era survey tools. Overall, we found that many of the studies used similar instruments. Questions regarding exposures were more similar across studies than other domains, while neurocognitive and psychological tools were the most variable. Many studies focused on self-reported survey results, with a range of validation practices. However, physical exams, biomedical assessments, and specimen storage were not common. This review suggests that while research may be able to pool data from past surveys, future surveys need to consider how their design can yield data comparable with previous surveys. Additionally, data that incorporate recent technologies in specimen and genetic analyses would greatly enhance such survey data. When combined with existing data on deployment-related exposures and post-deployment health conditions, longitudinal follow-up of existing studies within this collaborative framework could represent an important step toward improving the health of veterans.",
keywords = "Blood banks, Persian Gulf War 1991, Survey methods",
author = "McNeil, {Rebecca B.} and Thomas, {Catherine M.} and Coughlin, {Steven Scott} and Elizabeth Hauser and Huang, {Grant D.} and Goldstein, {Karen M.} and Johnson, {Marcus R.} and Tyra Dunn-Thomas and Provenzale, {Dawn T.}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1186/1476-069X-12-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
journal = "Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source",
issn = "1476-069X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An assessment of survey measures used across key epidemiologic studies of United States Gulf War i Era Veterans

AU - McNeil, Rebecca B.

AU - Thomas, Catherine M.

AU - Coughlin, Steven Scott

AU - Hauser, Elizabeth

AU - Huang, Grant D.

AU - Goldstein, Karen M.

AU - Johnson, Marcus R.

AU - Dunn-Thomas, Tyra

AU - Provenzale, Dawn T.

PY - 2013/3/15

Y1 - 2013/3/15

N2 - Over the past two decades, 12 large epidemiologic studies and 2 registries have focused on U.S. veterans of the 1990-1991 Gulf War Era. We conducted a review of these studies' research tools to identify existing gaps and overlaps of efforts to date, and to advance development of the next generation of Gulf War Era survey tools. Overall, we found that many of the studies used similar instruments. Questions regarding exposures were more similar across studies than other domains, while neurocognitive and psychological tools were the most variable. Many studies focused on self-reported survey results, with a range of validation practices. However, physical exams, biomedical assessments, and specimen storage were not common. This review suggests that while research may be able to pool data from past surveys, future surveys need to consider how their design can yield data comparable with previous surveys. Additionally, data that incorporate recent technologies in specimen and genetic analyses would greatly enhance such survey data. When combined with existing data on deployment-related exposures and post-deployment health conditions, longitudinal follow-up of existing studies within this collaborative framework could represent an important step toward improving the health of veterans.

AB - Over the past two decades, 12 large epidemiologic studies and 2 registries have focused on U.S. veterans of the 1990-1991 Gulf War Era. We conducted a review of these studies' research tools to identify existing gaps and overlaps of efforts to date, and to advance development of the next generation of Gulf War Era survey tools. Overall, we found that many of the studies used similar instruments. Questions regarding exposures were more similar across studies than other domains, while neurocognitive and psychological tools were the most variable. Many studies focused on self-reported survey results, with a range of validation practices. However, physical exams, biomedical assessments, and specimen storage were not common. This review suggests that while research may be able to pool data from past surveys, future surveys need to consider how their design can yield data comparable with previous surveys. Additionally, data that incorporate recent technologies in specimen and genetic analyses would greatly enhance such survey data. When combined with existing data on deployment-related exposures and post-deployment health conditions, longitudinal follow-up of existing studies within this collaborative framework could represent an important step toward improving the health of veterans.

KW - Blood banks

KW - Persian Gulf War 1991

KW - Survey methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874849281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874849281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1476-069X-12-4

DO - 10.1186/1476-069X-12-4

M3 - Review article

VL - 12

JO - Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

JF - Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

SN - 1476-069X

IS - 1

M1 - 4

ER -