An empirical bayes method for updating inferences in analysis of quantitative trait loci using information from related genome scans

Kui Zhang, Howard Wiener, Mark Beasley, Varghese George, Christopher I. Amos, David B. Allison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Individual genome scans for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping often suffer from low statistical power and imprecise estimates of QTL location and effect. This lack of precision yields large confidence intervals for QTL location, which are problematic for subsequent fine mapping and positional cloning. In prioritizing areas for follow-up after an initial genome scan and in evaluating the credibility of apparent linkage signals, investigators typically examine the results of other genome scans of the same phenotype and informally update their beliefs about which linkage signals in their scan most merit confidence and follow-up via a subjective-intuitive integration approach. A method that acknowledges the wisdom of this general paradigm but formally borrows information from other scans to increase confidence in objectivity would be a benefit. We developed an empirical Bayes analytic method to integrate information from multiple genome scans. The linkage statistic obtained from a single genome scan study is updated by incorporating statistics from other genome scans as prior information. This technique does not require that all studies have an identical marker map or a common estimated QTL effect. The updated linkage statistic can then be used for the estimation of QTL location and effect. We evaluate the performance of our method by using extensive simulations based on actual marker spacing and allele frequencies from available data. Results indicate that the empirical Bayes method can account for between-study heterogeneity, estimate the QTL location and effect more precisely, and provide narrower confidence intervals than results from any single individual study. We also compared the empirical Bayes method with a method originally developed for meta-analysis (a closely related but distinct purpose). In the face of marked heterogeneity among studies, the empirical Bayes method outperforms the comparator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2283-2296
Number of pages14
JournalGenetics
Volume173
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 31 2006

Fingerprint

Quantitative Trait Loci
Genome
Confidence Intervals
Gene Frequency
Meta-Analysis
Organism Cloning
Research Personnel
Phenotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Cite this

An empirical bayes method for updating inferences in analysis of quantitative trait loci using information from related genome scans. / Zhang, Kui; Wiener, Howard; Beasley, Mark; George, Varghese; Amos, Christopher I.; Allison, David B.

In: Genetics, Vol. 173, No. 4, 31.08.2006, p. 2283-2296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhang, Kui ; Wiener, Howard ; Beasley, Mark ; George, Varghese ; Amos, Christopher I. ; Allison, David B. / An empirical bayes method for updating inferences in analysis of quantitative trait loci using information from related genome scans. In: Genetics. 2006 ; Vol. 173, No. 4. pp. 2283-2296.
@article{9a533cb2ce264347b25aa2f07953e3d0,
title = "An empirical bayes method for updating inferences in analysis of quantitative trait loci using information from related genome scans",
abstract = "Individual genome scans for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping often suffer from low statistical power and imprecise estimates of QTL location and effect. This lack of precision yields large confidence intervals for QTL location, which are problematic for subsequent fine mapping and positional cloning. In prioritizing areas for follow-up after an initial genome scan and in evaluating the credibility of apparent linkage signals, investigators typically examine the results of other genome scans of the same phenotype and informally update their beliefs about which linkage signals in their scan most merit confidence and follow-up via a subjective-intuitive integration approach. A method that acknowledges the wisdom of this general paradigm but formally borrows information from other scans to increase confidence in objectivity would be a benefit. We developed an empirical Bayes analytic method to integrate information from multiple genome scans. The linkage statistic obtained from a single genome scan study is updated by incorporating statistics from other genome scans as prior information. This technique does not require that all studies have an identical marker map or a common estimated QTL effect. The updated linkage statistic can then be used for the estimation of QTL location and effect. We evaluate the performance of our method by using extensive simulations based on actual marker spacing and allele frequencies from available data. Results indicate that the empirical Bayes method can account for between-study heterogeneity, estimate the QTL location and effect more precisely, and provide narrower confidence intervals than results from any single individual study. We also compared the empirical Bayes method with a method originally developed for meta-analysis (a closely related but distinct purpose). In the face of marked heterogeneity among studies, the empirical Bayes method outperforms the comparator.",
author = "Kui Zhang and Howard Wiener and Mark Beasley and Varghese George and Amos, {Christopher I.} and Allison, {David B.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1534/genetics.106.057448",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "173",
pages = "2283--2296",
journal = "Genetics",
issn = "0016-6731",
publisher = "Genetics Society of America",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An empirical bayes method for updating inferences in analysis of quantitative trait loci using information from related genome scans

AU - Zhang, Kui

AU - Wiener, Howard

AU - Beasley, Mark

AU - George, Varghese

AU - Amos, Christopher I.

AU - Allison, David B.

PY - 2006/8/31

Y1 - 2006/8/31

N2 - Individual genome scans for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping often suffer from low statistical power and imprecise estimates of QTL location and effect. This lack of precision yields large confidence intervals for QTL location, which are problematic for subsequent fine mapping and positional cloning. In prioritizing areas for follow-up after an initial genome scan and in evaluating the credibility of apparent linkage signals, investigators typically examine the results of other genome scans of the same phenotype and informally update their beliefs about which linkage signals in their scan most merit confidence and follow-up via a subjective-intuitive integration approach. A method that acknowledges the wisdom of this general paradigm but formally borrows information from other scans to increase confidence in objectivity would be a benefit. We developed an empirical Bayes analytic method to integrate information from multiple genome scans. The linkage statistic obtained from a single genome scan study is updated by incorporating statistics from other genome scans as prior information. This technique does not require that all studies have an identical marker map or a common estimated QTL effect. The updated linkage statistic can then be used for the estimation of QTL location and effect. We evaluate the performance of our method by using extensive simulations based on actual marker spacing and allele frequencies from available data. Results indicate that the empirical Bayes method can account for between-study heterogeneity, estimate the QTL location and effect more precisely, and provide narrower confidence intervals than results from any single individual study. We also compared the empirical Bayes method with a method originally developed for meta-analysis (a closely related but distinct purpose). In the face of marked heterogeneity among studies, the empirical Bayes method outperforms the comparator.

AB - Individual genome scans for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping often suffer from low statistical power and imprecise estimates of QTL location and effect. This lack of precision yields large confidence intervals for QTL location, which are problematic for subsequent fine mapping and positional cloning. In prioritizing areas for follow-up after an initial genome scan and in evaluating the credibility of apparent linkage signals, investigators typically examine the results of other genome scans of the same phenotype and informally update their beliefs about which linkage signals in their scan most merit confidence and follow-up via a subjective-intuitive integration approach. A method that acknowledges the wisdom of this general paradigm but formally borrows information from other scans to increase confidence in objectivity would be a benefit. We developed an empirical Bayes analytic method to integrate information from multiple genome scans. The linkage statistic obtained from a single genome scan study is updated by incorporating statistics from other genome scans as prior information. This technique does not require that all studies have an identical marker map or a common estimated QTL effect. The updated linkage statistic can then be used for the estimation of QTL location and effect. We evaluate the performance of our method by using extensive simulations based on actual marker spacing and allele frequencies from available data. Results indicate that the empirical Bayes method can account for between-study heterogeneity, estimate the QTL location and effect more precisely, and provide narrower confidence intervals than results from any single individual study. We also compared the empirical Bayes method with a method originally developed for meta-analysis (a closely related but distinct purpose). In the face of marked heterogeneity among studies, the empirical Bayes method outperforms the comparator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747851973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747851973&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1534/genetics.106.057448

DO - 10.1534/genetics.106.057448

M3 - Article

VL - 173

SP - 2283

EP - 2296

JO - Genetics

JF - Genetics

SN - 0016-6731

IS - 4

ER -