An improved prick skin-test procedure for young children

Dennis Randall Ownby, John A. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The prick method of skin testing is advantageous for young children because of the decreased risk of anaphylaxis and less patient discomfort. Some would argue, however, that the necessity of keeping extract drops at the skin-test sites makes prick testing impractical compared with intradermal testing for squirming youngsters. Since the literature is not clear concerning the length of time extract must be present at the prick site, we performed duplicate sets of prick tests with five concentrations of ragweed extract on 16 ragweed-sensitive adults. For one set of tests, the drops were removed immediately after the skin had been pricked; for the other set, extracts remained at the site for 15 min. After 15 min we recorded the size of the wheal and flare response for each test. On the basis of analysis of these paired observations, we concluded that there is no significant difference between these two methods of administering prick skin tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)533-535
Number of pages3
JournalThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology
Volume69
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ambrosia
Skin Tests
Skin
Anaphylaxis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

An improved prick skin-test procedure for young children. / Ownby, Dennis Randall; Anderson, John A.

In: The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, Vol. 69, No. 6, 01.01.1982, p. 533-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{043853db093046c985eb457392d45507,
title = "An improved prick skin-test procedure for young children",
abstract = "The prick method of skin testing is advantageous for young children because of the decreased risk of anaphylaxis and less patient discomfort. Some would argue, however, that the necessity of keeping extract drops at the skin-test sites makes prick testing impractical compared with intradermal testing for squirming youngsters. Since the literature is not clear concerning the length of time extract must be present at the prick site, we performed duplicate sets of prick tests with five concentrations of ragweed extract on 16 ragweed-sensitive adults. For one set of tests, the drops were removed immediately after the skin had been pricked; for the other set, extracts remained at the site for 15 min. After 15 min we recorded the size of the wheal and flare response for each test. On the basis of analysis of these paired observations, we concluded that there is no significant difference between these two methods of administering prick skin tests.",
author = "Ownby, {Dennis Randall} and Anderson, {John A.}",
year = "1982",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0091-6749(82)90179-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "533--535",
journal = "Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology",
issn = "0091-6749",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An improved prick skin-test procedure for young children

AU - Ownby, Dennis Randall

AU - Anderson, John A.

PY - 1982/1/1

Y1 - 1982/1/1

N2 - The prick method of skin testing is advantageous for young children because of the decreased risk of anaphylaxis and less patient discomfort. Some would argue, however, that the necessity of keeping extract drops at the skin-test sites makes prick testing impractical compared with intradermal testing for squirming youngsters. Since the literature is not clear concerning the length of time extract must be present at the prick site, we performed duplicate sets of prick tests with five concentrations of ragweed extract on 16 ragweed-sensitive adults. For one set of tests, the drops were removed immediately after the skin had been pricked; for the other set, extracts remained at the site for 15 min. After 15 min we recorded the size of the wheal and flare response for each test. On the basis of analysis of these paired observations, we concluded that there is no significant difference between these two methods of administering prick skin tests.

AB - The prick method of skin testing is advantageous for young children because of the decreased risk of anaphylaxis and less patient discomfort. Some would argue, however, that the necessity of keeping extract drops at the skin-test sites makes prick testing impractical compared with intradermal testing for squirming youngsters. Since the literature is not clear concerning the length of time extract must be present at the prick site, we performed duplicate sets of prick tests with five concentrations of ragweed extract on 16 ragweed-sensitive adults. For one set of tests, the drops were removed immediately after the skin had been pricked; for the other set, extracts remained at the site for 15 min. After 15 min we recorded the size of the wheal and flare response for each test. On the basis of analysis of these paired observations, we concluded that there is no significant difference between these two methods of administering prick skin tests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019951474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019951474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0091-6749(82)90179-8

DO - 10.1016/0091-6749(82)90179-8

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 533

EP - 535

JO - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

JF - Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

SN - 0091-6749

IS - 6

ER -