Analysis of resistance to gas flow in nine adult ventilator circuits

F. H. Dennison, Arthur A Taft, S. C. Mishoe, L. L. Hooker, S. B. Eatherly, R. W. Beckham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We measured the resistance in nine complete ventilator circuits, partial circuits and 7, 8, and 9 mm ID endotracheal tubes at flow rates of 20 to 120 liters per minute. We found a statistically significant (p < 0.01) increase in resistive pressure with increases in flow rate, as the diameter of the ETT decreased, and as each component of the ventilator circuit was added to the ETT. There was a curvilinear increase in resistive pressure to increase in flow rate. However, when resistances were computed, the Bennett cascade 'circuit' created higher resistance at 20 lpm than at flow rates up to 120 lpm. The Bennett cascade humidifier added the greatest resistive pressure, 3.5 to 8.5 cm H2O, the Engstrom Edith, 0.5 to 6.5 cm H2O and the Conchapak added the least, 0.0 to 2.5 cm H2O at flow rates of 20 to 120 lpm. After all the components of the ventilator circuit were attached to the ETTs, there was approximately a 97 to 450 percent increase in resistive pressure compared to the resistive pressure created by the ETTs alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1374-1379
Number of pages6
JournalChest
Volume96
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

Fingerprint

Mechanical Ventilators
Gases
Pressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Dennison, F. H., Taft, A. A., Mishoe, S. C., Hooker, L. L., Eatherly, S. B., & Beckham, R. W. (1989). Analysis of resistance to gas flow in nine adult ventilator circuits. Chest, 96(6), 1374-1379. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.96.6.1374

Analysis of resistance to gas flow in nine adult ventilator circuits. / Dennison, F. H.; Taft, Arthur A; Mishoe, S. C.; Hooker, L. L.; Eatherly, S. B.; Beckham, R. W.

In: Chest, Vol. 96, No. 6, 01.01.1989, p. 1374-1379.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dennison, FH, Taft, AA, Mishoe, SC, Hooker, LL, Eatherly, SB & Beckham, RW 1989, 'Analysis of resistance to gas flow in nine adult ventilator circuits', Chest, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 1374-1379. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.96.6.1374
Dennison FH, Taft AA, Mishoe SC, Hooker LL, Eatherly SB, Beckham RW. Analysis of resistance to gas flow in nine adult ventilator circuits. Chest. 1989 Jan 1;96(6):1374-1379. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.96.6.1374
Dennison, F. H. ; Taft, Arthur A ; Mishoe, S. C. ; Hooker, L. L. ; Eatherly, S. B. ; Beckham, R. W. / Analysis of resistance to gas flow in nine adult ventilator circuits. In: Chest. 1989 ; Vol. 96, No. 6. pp. 1374-1379.
@article{9a923edf3f60438da6fc9e0d6ae8c3db,
title = "Analysis of resistance to gas flow in nine adult ventilator circuits",
abstract = "We measured the resistance in nine complete ventilator circuits, partial circuits and 7, 8, and 9 mm ID endotracheal tubes at flow rates of 20 to 120 liters per minute. We found a statistically significant (p < 0.01) increase in resistive pressure with increases in flow rate, as the diameter of the ETT decreased, and as each component of the ventilator circuit was added to the ETT. There was a curvilinear increase in resistive pressure to increase in flow rate. However, when resistances were computed, the Bennett cascade 'circuit' created higher resistance at 20 lpm than at flow rates up to 120 lpm. The Bennett cascade humidifier added the greatest resistive pressure, 3.5 to 8.5 cm H2O, the Engstrom Edith, 0.5 to 6.5 cm H2O and the Conchapak added the least, 0.0 to 2.5 cm H2O at flow rates of 20 to 120 lpm. After all the components of the ventilator circuit were attached to the ETTs, there was approximately a 97 to 450 percent increase in resistive pressure compared to the resistive pressure created by the ETTs alone.",
author = "Dennison, {F. H.} and Taft, {Arthur A} and Mishoe, {S. C.} and Hooker, {L. L.} and Eatherly, {S. B.} and Beckham, {R. W.}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1378/chest.96.6.1374",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "1374--1379",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of resistance to gas flow in nine adult ventilator circuits

AU - Dennison, F. H.

AU - Taft, Arthur A

AU - Mishoe, S. C.

AU - Hooker, L. L.

AU - Eatherly, S. B.

AU - Beckham, R. W.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - We measured the resistance in nine complete ventilator circuits, partial circuits and 7, 8, and 9 mm ID endotracheal tubes at flow rates of 20 to 120 liters per minute. We found a statistically significant (p < 0.01) increase in resistive pressure with increases in flow rate, as the diameter of the ETT decreased, and as each component of the ventilator circuit was added to the ETT. There was a curvilinear increase in resistive pressure to increase in flow rate. However, when resistances were computed, the Bennett cascade 'circuit' created higher resistance at 20 lpm than at flow rates up to 120 lpm. The Bennett cascade humidifier added the greatest resistive pressure, 3.5 to 8.5 cm H2O, the Engstrom Edith, 0.5 to 6.5 cm H2O and the Conchapak added the least, 0.0 to 2.5 cm H2O at flow rates of 20 to 120 lpm. After all the components of the ventilator circuit were attached to the ETTs, there was approximately a 97 to 450 percent increase in resistive pressure compared to the resistive pressure created by the ETTs alone.

AB - We measured the resistance in nine complete ventilator circuits, partial circuits and 7, 8, and 9 mm ID endotracheal tubes at flow rates of 20 to 120 liters per minute. We found a statistically significant (p < 0.01) increase in resistive pressure with increases in flow rate, as the diameter of the ETT decreased, and as each component of the ventilator circuit was added to the ETT. There was a curvilinear increase in resistive pressure to increase in flow rate. However, when resistances were computed, the Bennett cascade 'circuit' created higher resistance at 20 lpm than at flow rates up to 120 lpm. The Bennett cascade humidifier added the greatest resistive pressure, 3.5 to 8.5 cm H2O, the Engstrom Edith, 0.5 to 6.5 cm H2O and the Conchapak added the least, 0.0 to 2.5 cm H2O at flow rates of 20 to 120 lpm. After all the components of the ventilator circuit were attached to the ETTs, there was approximately a 97 to 450 percent increase in resistive pressure compared to the resistive pressure created by the ETTs alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024345096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024345096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1378/chest.96.6.1374

DO - 10.1378/chest.96.6.1374

M3 - Article

VL - 96

SP - 1374

EP - 1379

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 6

ER -