Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size: An analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data

Awoniyi O. Awonuga, Zaher Merhi, Modupe T. Awonuga, Terri Ann Samuels, Jennifer L Waller, David Pring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: To determine whether measurements of maternal height and shoe size are predictors of pelvic size, using erect lateral computerized tomography (CT) pelvimetry as gold standard. Materials and methods: Three hundred and fifty three obstetric patients out of a sequential population of 6112 (5.8%) had CT pelvimetry performed between January 1990 and December 1991 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, York District Hospital, United Kingdom. Multivariable logistic regression models were built using maternal height (n = 322), shoe size (314) and weight at last clinic visit (n = 318). The reference standard for pelvic size was CT Pelvimetry. Pelvic adequacy was defined as an anterior-posterior diameter of the inlet of ≥ 11 cm and an anterior-posterior diameter of the outlet ≥ 10 cm on erect lateral CT pelvimetry. Women with values lower than these were regarded as having an inadequate pelvis. The diagnostic accuracy of the models was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for maternal height (0.768) was not significantly greater than that for shoe size (0.686, p = 0.163 for the difference in AUC's) and weight at the last clinic visit (0.655, p = 0.057 for the difference in the AUCs). The change in the AUC for each of the models (the full model with height, shoe size and weight [0.769]; model for height and shoe size [0.767] model for just height [0.768]) was also not significantly different. Conclusions: Measurements of maternal height, shoe size and weight at the last clinic visit are not useful for the identification of women with inadequate pelvis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)523-528
Number of pages6
JournalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume276
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007

Fingerprint

Shoes
Pelvimetry
Area Under Curve
Tomography
Mothers
Ambulatory Care
Weights and Measures
Pelvis
Logistic Models
Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department
District Hospitals
Gynecology
ROC Curve
Obstetrics
Population

Keywords

  • Height
  • Pelvic size
  • Pelvimetry
  • Shoe size
  • Weight

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size : An analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data. / Awonuga, Awoniyi O.; Merhi, Zaher; Awonuga, Modupe T.; Samuels, Terri Ann; Waller, Jennifer L; Pring, David.

In: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol. 276, No. 5, 01.11.2007, p. 523-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Awonuga, Awoniyi O. ; Merhi, Zaher ; Awonuga, Modupe T. ; Samuels, Terri Ann ; Waller, Jennifer L ; Pring, David. / Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size : An analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data. In: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2007 ; Vol. 276, No. 5. pp. 523-528.
@article{2000d8ff40ea43d8b01a1bfedc668df8,
title = "Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size: An analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data",
abstract = "Background: To determine whether measurements of maternal height and shoe size are predictors of pelvic size, using erect lateral computerized tomography (CT) pelvimetry as gold standard. Materials and methods: Three hundred and fifty three obstetric patients out of a sequential population of 6112 (5.8{\%}) had CT pelvimetry performed between January 1990 and December 1991 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, York District Hospital, United Kingdom. Multivariable logistic regression models were built using maternal height (n = 322), shoe size (314) and weight at last clinic visit (n = 318). The reference standard for pelvic size was CT Pelvimetry. Pelvic adequacy was defined as an anterior-posterior diameter of the inlet of ≥ 11 cm and an anterior-posterior diameter of the outlet ≥ 10 cm on erect lateral CT pelvimetry. Women with values lower than these were regarded as having an inadequate pelvis. The diagnostic accuracy of the models was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for maternal height (0.768) was not significantly greater than that for shoe size (0.686, p = 0.163 for the difference in AUC's) and weight at the last clinic visit (0.655, p = 0.057 for the difference in the AUCs). The change in the AUC for each of the models (the full model with height, shoe size and weight [0.769]; model for height and shoe size [0.767] model for just height [0.768]) was also not significantly different. Conclusions: Measurements of maternal height, shoe size and weight at the last clinic visit are not useful for the identification of women with inadequate pelvis.",
keywords = "Height, Pelvic size, Pelvimetry, Shoe size, Weight",
author = "Awonuga, {Awoniyi O.} and Zaher Merhi and Awonuga, {Modupe T.} and Samuels, {Terri Ann} and Waller, {Jennifer L} and David Pring",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00404-007-0370-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "276",
pages = "523--528",
journal = "Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics",
issn = "0932-0067",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size

T2 - An analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data

AU - Awonuga, Awoniyi O.

AU - Merhi, Zaher

AU - Awonuga, Modupe T.

AU - Samuels, Terri Ann

AU - Waller, Jennifer L

AU - Pring, David

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Background: To determine whether measurements of maternal height and shoe size are predictors of pelvic size, using erect lateral computerized tomography (CT) pelvimetry as gold standard. Materials and methods: Three hundred and fifty three obstetric patients out of a sequential population of 6112 (5.8%) had CT pelvimetry performed between January 1990 and December 1991 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, York District Hospital, United Kingdom. Multivariable logistic regression models were built using maternal height (n = 322), shoe size (314) and weight at last clinic visit (n = 318). The reference standard for pelvic size was CT Pelvimetry. Pelvic adequacy was defined as an anterior-posterior diameter of the inlet of ≥ 11 cm and an anterior-posterior diameter of the outlet ≥ 10 cm on erect lateral CT pelvimetry. Women with values lower than these were regarded as having an inadequate pelvis. The diagnostic accuracy of the models was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for maternal height (0.768) was not significantly greater than that for shoe size (0.686, p = 0.163 for the difference in AUC's) and weight at the last clinic visit (0.655, p = 0.057 for the difference in the AUCs). The change in the AUC for each of the models (the full model with height, shoe size and weight [0.769]; model for height and shoe size [0.767] model for just height [0.768]) was also not significantly different. Conclusions: Measurements of maternal height, shoe size and weight at the last clinic visit are not useful for the identification of women with inadequate pelvis.

AB - Background: To determine whether measurements of maternal height and shoe size are predictors of pelvic size, using erect lateral computerized tomography (CT) pelvimetry as gold standard. Materials and methods: Three hundred and fifty three obstetric patients out of a sequential population of 6112 (5.8%) had CT pelvimetry performed between January 1990 and December 1991 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, York District Hospital, United Kingdom. Multivariable logistic regression models were built using maternal height (n = 322), shoe size (314) and weight at last clinic visit (n = 318). The reference standard for pelvic size was CT Pelvimetry. Pelvic adequacy was defined as an anterior-posterior diameter of the inlet of ≥ 11 cm and an anterior-posterior diameter of the outlet ≥ 10 cm on erect lateral CT pelvimetry. Women with values lower than these were regarded as having an inadequate pelvis. The diagnostic accuracy of the models was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: The area under the curve (AUC) for maternal height (0.768) was not significantly greater than that for shoe size (0.686, p = 0.163 for the difference in AUC's) and weight at the last clinic visit (0.655, p = 0.057 for the difference in the AUCs). The change in the AUC for each of the models (the full model with height, shoe size and weight [0.769]; model for height and shoe size [0.767] model for just height [0.768]) was also not significantly different. Conclusions: Measurements of maternal height, shoe size and weight at the last clinic visit are not useful for the identification of women with inadequate pelvis.

KW - Height

KW - Pelvic size

KW - Pelvimetry

KW - Shoe size

KW - Weight

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548665072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548665072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00404-007-0370-0

DO - 10.1007/s00404-007-0370-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 17458554

AN - SCOPUS:34548665072

VL - 276

SP - 523

EP - 528

JO - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

JF - Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

SN - 0932-0067

IS - 5

ER -