Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems

C. Prati, F. Fava, D. Di Gioia, M. Selighini, D. H. Pashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the antibacterial activities of several commercially available glass ionomer cements, dentin bonding systems and luting agents by employing both agar plate diffusion (APD) and growth inhibition (GI) methods. Amalgam and resin composites were also tested as control materials. In both methods (APD and GI), cylindrical specimens were used. Four bacteria strains were tested: Streptococcus mutans, S. salivarius, S. mitis and S. sanguis. These studies were performed using standardized innoculums with selective media, and the assayed materials were directly applied on the assay cultures and plates. The results of agar plate assay were in accordance with the results of growth inhibition method. The glass ionomer cements showed marked antibacterial activity. On the contrary, amalgam, composites, luting agents and dentinal bonding systems did not affect bacterial growth. The sensitivity of the growth method showed that all the strains were inhibited in the same way by each inhibitory material. The data suggest that the use of glass ionomer cements as cavity liners/bases may reduce the consequences of microleakage due to its antibacterial properties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)338-343
Number of pages6
JournalDental Materials
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1993

Fingerprint

Dentin
Glass Ionomer Cements
Ionomers
Dental Cements
Agar
Growth Plate
Mercury amalgams
Cements
Growth
Dentin-Bonding Agents
Glass
Assays
Streptococcus mutans
Composite Resins
Composite materials
Bacteria
Resins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Materials Science(all)
  • Dentistry(all)
  • Mechanics of Materials

Cite this

Prati, C., Fava, F., Di Gioia, D., Selighini, M., & Pashley, D. H. (1993). Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. Dental Materials, 9(6), 338-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90053-S

Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. / Prati, C.; Fava, F.; Di Gioia, D.; Selighini, M.; Pashley, D. H.

In: Dental Materials, Vol. 9, No. 6, 11.1993, p. 338-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prati, C, Fava, F, Di Gioia, D, Selighini, M & Pashley, DH 1993, 'Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems', Dental Materials, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 338-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90053-S
Prati C, Fava F, Di Gioia D, Selighini M, Pashley DH. Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. Dental Materials. 1993 Nov;9(6):338-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90053-S
Prati, C. ; Fava, F. ; Di Gioia, D. ; Selighini, M. ; Pashley, D. H. / Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems. In: Dental Materials. 1993 ; Vol. 9, No. 6. pp. 338-343.
@article{f2a02db4c50d431e9fe447efc36e37da,
title = "Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems",
abstract = "This study examined the antibacterial activities of several commercially available glass ionomer cements, dentin bonding systems and luting agents by employing both agar plate diffusion (APD) and growth inhibition (GI) methods. Amalgam and resin composites were also tested as control materials. In both methods (APD and GI), cylindrical specimens were used. Four bacteria strains were tested: Streptococcus mutans, S. salivarius, S. mitis and S. sanguis. These studies were performed using standardized innoculums with selective media, and the assayed materials were directly applied on the assay cultures and plates. The results of agar plate assay were in accordance with the results of growth inhibition method. The glass ionomer cements showed marked antibacterial activity. On the contrary, amalgam, composites, luting agents and dentinal bonding systems did not affect bacterial growth. The sensitivity of the growth method showed that all the strains were inhibited in the same way by each inhibitory material. The data suggest that the use of glass ionomer cements as cavity liners/bases may reduce the consequences of microleakage due to its antibacterial properties.",
author = "C. Prati and F. Fava and {Di Gioia}, D. and M. Selighini and Pashley, {D. H.}",
year = "1993",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/0109-5641(93)90053-S",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "338--343",
journal = "Dental Materials",
issn = "0109-5641",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antibacterial effectiveness of dentin bonding systems

AU - Prati, C.

AU - Fava, F.

AU - Di Gioia, D.

AU - Selighini, M.

AU - Pashley, D. H.

PY - 1993/11

Y1 - 1993/11

N2 - This study examined the antibacterial activities of several commercially available glass ionomer cements, dentin bonding systems and luting agents by employing both agar plate diffusion (APD) and growth inhibition (GI) methods. Amalgam and resin composites were also tested as control materials. In both methods (APD and GI), cylindrical specimens were used. Four bacteria strains were tested: Streptococcus mutans, S. salivarius, S. mitis and S. sanguis. These studies were performed using standardized innoculums with selective media, and the assayed materials were directly applied on the assay cultures and plates. The results of agar plate assay were in accordance with the results of growth inhibition method. The glass ionomer cements showed marked antibacterial activity. On the contrary, amalgam, composites, luting agents and dentinal bonding systems did not affect bacterial growth. The sensitivity of the growth method showed that all the strains were inhibited in the same way by each inhibitory material. The data suggest that the use of glass ionomer cements as cavity liners/bases may reduce the consequences of microleakage due to its antibacterial properties.

AB - This study examined the antibacterial activities of several commercially available glass ionomer cements, dentin bonding systems and luting agents by employing both agar plate diffusion (APD) and growth inhibition (GI) methods. Amalgam and resin composites were also tested as control materials. In both methods (APD and GI), cylindrical specimens were used. Four bacteria strains were tested: Streptococcus mutans, S. salivarius, S. mitis and S. sanguis. These studies were performed using standardized innoculums with selective media, and the assayed materials were directly applied on the assay cultures and plates. The results of agar plate assay were in accordance with the results of growth inhibition method. The glass ionomer cements showed marked antibacterial activity. On the contrary, amalgam, composites, luting agents and dentinal bonding systems did not affect bacterial growth. The sensitivity of the growth method showed that all the strains were inhibited in the same way by each inhibitory material. The data suggest that the use of glass ionomer cements as cavity liners/bases may reduce the consequences of microleakage due to its antibacterial properties.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027704116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027704116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90053-S

DO - 10.1016/0109-5641(93)90053-S

M3 - Article

C2 - 7988764

AN - SCOPUS:0027704116

VL - 9

SP - 338

EP - 343

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

SN - 0109-5641

IS - 6

ER -