Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria

Justin D. Orr, Jeffrey D. Hoffmann, Edward D. Arrington, Tad L. Gerlinger, John Glenden DeVine, Philip J. Belmont

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Factors associated with successful selection in U.S. Army orthopaedic surgical programs are unreported. The current analysis includes survey data from all Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors (PDs) to determine these factors. PDs at all Army orthopaedic surgery residency programs were provided 17 factors historically considered critical to successful selection and asked to rank order the factors as well as assign a level of importance to each. Results were collated and overall mean rankings are provided. PDs unanimously expressed that performance during the on-site orthopaedic surgery rotation at the individual program director's institution was most important. Respondents overwhelmingly reported that Steps 1 and 2 licensing exam scores were next most important, respectively. Survey data demonstrated that little importance was placed on letters of recommendation and personal statements. PDs made no discriminations based on allopathic or osteopathic degrees. The most important factors for Army orthopaedic surgery residency selection were clerkship performance at the individual PD's institution and licensing examination score performance. Army PDs consider both USMLE and COMLEX results, because Army programs have a higher percentage of successful osteopathic applicants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-124
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of surgical orthopaedic advances
Volume24
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Patient Selection
Orthopedics
Licensure
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Orr, J. D., Hoffmann, J. D., Arrington, E. D., Gerlinger, T. L., DeVine, J. G., & Belmont, P. J. (2015). Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria. Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances, 24(2), 120-124.

Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria. / Orr, Justin D.; Hoffmann, Jeffrey D.; Arrington, Edward D.; Gerlinger, Tad L.; DeVine, John Glenden; Belmont, Philip J.

In: Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.06.2015, p. 120-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Orr, JD, Hoffmann, JD, Arrington, ED, Gerlinger, TL, DeVine, JG & Belmont, PJ 2015, 'Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria', Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 120-124.
Orr JD, Hoffmann JD, Arrington ED, Gerlinger TL, DeVine JG, Belmont PJ. Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria. Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances. 2015 Jun 1;24(2):120-124.
Orr, Justin D. ; Hoffmann, Jeffrey D. ; Arrington, Edward D. ; Gerlinger, Tad L. ; DeVine, John Glenden ; Belmont, Philip J. / Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria. In: Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 120-124.
@article{ba6b4643c1684868a9404fc86b3417f4,
title = "Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria",
abstract = "Factors associated with successful selection in U.S. Army orthopaedic surgical programs are unreported. The current analysis includes survey data from all Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors (PDs) to determine these factors. PDs at all Army orthopaedic surgery residency programs were provided 17 factors historically considered critical to successful selection and asked to rank order the factors as well as assign a level of importance to each. Results were collated and overall mean rankings are provided. PDs unanimously expressed that performance during the on-site orthopaedic surgery rotation at the individual program director's institution was most important. Respondents overwhelmingly reported that Steps 1 and 2 licensing exam scores were next most important, respectively. Survey data demonstrated that little importance was placed on letters of recommendation and personal statements. PDs made no discriminations based on allopathic or osteopathic degrees. The most important factors for Army orthopaedic surgery residency selection were clerkship performance at the individual PD's institution and licensing examination score performance. Army PDs consider both USMLE and COMLEX results, because Army programs have a higher percentage of successful osteopathic applicants.",
author = "Orr, {Justin D.} and Hoffmann, {Jeffrey D.} and Arrington, {Edward D.} and Gerlinger, {Tad L.} and DeVine, {John Glenden} and Belmont, {Philip J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "120--124",
journal = "Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association",
issn = "1548-825X",
publisher = "Data Trace Publishing Co.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors' selection criteria

AU - Orr, Justin D.

AU - Hoffmann, Jeffrey D.

AU - Arrington, Edward D.

AU - Gerlinger, Tad L.

AU - DeVine, John Glenden

AU - Belmont, Philip J.

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Factors associated with successful selection in U.S. Army orthopaedic surgical programs are unreported. The current analysis includes survey data from all Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors (PDs) to determine these factors. PDs at all Army orthopaedic surgery residency programs were provided 17 factors historically considered critical to successful selection and asked to rank order the factors as well as assign a level of importance to each. Results were collated and overall mean rankings are provided. PDs unanimously expressed that performance during the on-site orthopaedic surgery rotation at the individual program director's institution was most important. Respondents overwhelmingly reported that Steps 1 and 2 licensing exam scores were next most important, respectively. Survey data demonstrated that little importance was placed on letters of recommendation and personal statements. PDs made no discriminations based on allopathic or osteopathic degrees. The most important factors for Army orthopaedic surgery residency selection were clerkship performance at the individual PD's institution and licensing examination score performance. Army PDs consider both USMLE and COMLEX results, because Army programs have a higher percentage of successful osteopathic applicants.

AB - Factors associated with successful selection in U.S. Army orthopaedic surgical programs are unreported. The current analysis includes survey data from all Army orthopaedic surgery residency program directors (PDs) to determine these factors. PDs at all Army orthopaedic surgery residency programs were provided 17 factors historically considered critical to successful selection and asked to rank order the factors as well as assign a level of importance to each. Results were collated and overall mean rankings are provided. PDs unanimously expressed that performance during the on-site orthopaedic surgery rotation at the individual program director's institution was most important. Respondents overwhelmingly reported that Steps 1 and 2 licensing exam scores were next most important, respectively. Survey data demonstrated that little importance was placed on letters of recommendation and personal statements. PDs made no discriminations based on allopathic or osteopathic degrees. The most important factors for Army orthopaedic surgery residency selection were clerkship performance at the individual PD's institution and licensing examination score performance. Army PDs consider both USMLE and COMLEX results, because Army programs have a higher percentage of successful osteopathic applicants.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938931610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938931610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 120

EP - 124

JO - Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association

JF - Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association

SN - 1548-825X

IS - 2

ER -