Association between cesarean delivery types and obesity in preadolescence

Alexandra R. Sitarik, Suzanne L. Havstad, Christine C. Johnson, Kyra Jones, Albert M. Levin, Susan V. Lynch, Dennis R. Ownby, Andrew G. Rundle, Jennifer K. Straughen, Ganesa Wegienka, Kimberley J. Woodcroft, Germaine J.M. Yong, Andrea E. Cassidy-Bushrow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Background/objectives: The association between mode of delivery and childhood obesity remains inconclusive. Because few studies have separated C-section types (planned or unplanned C-section), our objective was to assess how these subtypes relate to preadolescent obesity. Subjects/methods: The study consisted of 570 maternal–child pairs drawn from the WHEALS birth cohort based in Detroit, Michigan. Children were followed-up at 10 years of age where a variety of anthropometric measurements were collected. Obesity was defined based on BMI percentile (≥95th percentile), as well as through Gaussian finite mixture modeling on the anthropometric measurements. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for obesity comparing planned and unplanned C-sections to vaginal deliveries were computed, which utilized inverse probability weights to account for loss to follow-up and multiple imputation for covariate missingness. Mediation models were fit to examine the mediation role of breastfeeding. Results: After adjusting for marital status, maternal race, prenatal tobacco smoke exposure, maternal age, maternal BMI, any hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, gestational diabetes, prenatal antibiotic use, child sex, parity, and birthweight z-score, children born via planned C-section had 1.77 times higher risk of obesity (≥95th percentile), relative to those delivered vaginally ((95% CI) = (1.16, 2.72); p = 0.009). No association was found comparing unplanned C-section to vaginal delivery (RR (95% CI) = 0.75 (0.45, 1.23); p = 0.25). The results were similar but slightly stronger when obesity was defined by anthropometric class (RR (95% CI) = 2.78 (1.47, 5.26); p = 0.002). Breastfeeding did not mediate the association between mode of delivery and obesity. Conclusions: These findings indicate that children delivered via planned C-section—but not unplanned C-section—have a higher risk of preadolescent obesity, suggesting that partial labor or membrane rupture (typically experienced during unplanned C-section delivery) may offer protection. Additional research is needed to understand the biological mechanisms behind this effect, including whether microbiological differences fully or partially account for the association.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2023-2034
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Obesity
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics


Dive into the research topics of 'Association between cesarean delivery types and obesity in preadolescence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this