Big Data Clinical Research: Validity, Ethics, and Regulation

E Andrew Balas, Marlo M Cavnar Vernon, Farah Magrabi, Lynne Thomas Gordon, Joanne Sexton

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

Electronic Health Records (EHR) promise improvement for patient care and also offer great value for biomedical research including clinical, public health, and health services research. Unfortunately, the full potential of EHR big data research has remained largely unrealized. The purpose of this study was to identify rate limiting factors, and develop recommendations to better balance unrestricted extramural EHR access with legitimate safeguarding of EHR data in retrospective research. By exploring primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, this review identifies external constraints and provides a comparative analysis of social influencers in retrospective EHR-based research. Results indicate that EHRs have the advantage of reflecting the reality of patient care but also show a frequency of between 4.3-86% of incomplete and inaccurate data in various fields. The rapid spread of alternative analytics for health data challenges traditional interpretations of confidentiality protections. A confusing multiplicity of controls creates barriers to big data EHR research. More research on the use of EHR big data is likely to improve accuracy and validity. Information governance and research approval processes should be simplified. Comprehensive regulatory policies that do not exclusively cover health care entities, are needed. Finally, new computing safeguards are needed to address public concerns, like research access only to aggregate data and not to individually identifiable information.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMEDINFO 2015
Subtitle of host publicationeHealth-Enabled Health - Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics
EditorsAndrew Georgiou, Indra Neil Sarkar, Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo Marques
PublisherIOS Press
Pages448-452
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781614995630
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Event15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics, MEDINFO 2015 - Sao Paulo, Brazil
Duration: Aug 19 2015Aug 23 2015

Publication series

NameStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume216
ISSN (Print)0926-9630
ISSN (Electronic)1879-8365

Other

Other15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics, MEDINFO 2015
CountryBrazil
CitySao Paulo
Period8/19/158/23/15

Fingerprint

Research Ethics
Electronic Health Records
Health
Research
Patient Care
Health Services Research
Confidentiality
Big data
Biomedical Research
Public health
Public Health
Health care
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Clinical Research
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Health Services Research
  • Public Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Balas, E. A., Vernon, M. M. C., Magrabi, F., Gordon, L. T., & Sexton, J. (2015). Big Data Clinical Research: Validity, Ethics, and Regulation. In A. Georgiou, I. N. Sarkar, & P. M. de Azevedo Marques (Eds.), MEDINFO 2015: eHealth-Enabled Health - Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics (pp. 448-452). (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics; Vol. 216). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-448

Big Data Clinical Research : Validity, Ethics, and Regulation. / Balas, E Andrew; Vernon, Marlo M Cavnar; Magrabi, Farah; Gordon, Lynne Thomas; Sexton, Joanne.

MEDINFO 2015: eHealth-Enabled Health - Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics. ed. / Andrew Georgiou; Indra Neil Sarkar; Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo Marques. IOS Press, 2015. p. 448-452 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics; Vol. 216).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Balas, EA, Vernon, MMC, Magrabi, F, Gordon, LT & Sexton, J 2015, Big Data Clinical Research: Validity, Ethics, and Regulation. in A Georgiou, IN Sarkar & PM de Azevedo Marques (eds), MEDINFO 2015: eHealth-Enabled Health - Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 216, IOS Press, pp. 448-452, 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics, MEDINFO 2015, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 8/19/15. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-448
Balas EA, Vernon MMC, Magrabi F, Gordon LT, Sexton J. Big Data Clinical Research: Validity, Ethics, and Regulation. In Georgiou A, Sarkar IN, de Azevedo Marques PM, editors, MEDINFO 2015: eHealth-Enabled Health - Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics. IOS Press. 2015. p. 448-452. (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-448
Balas, E Andrew ; Vernon, Marlo M Cavnar ; Magrabi, Farah ; Gordon, Lynne Thomas ; Sexton, Joanne. / Big Data Clinical Research : Validity, Ethics, and Regulation. MEDINFO 2015: eHealth-Enabled Health - Proceedings of the 15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics. editor / Andrew Georgiou ; Indra Neil Sarkar ; Paulo Mazzoncini de Azevedo Marques. IOS Press, 2015. pp. 448-452 (Studies in Health Technology and Informatics).
@inproceedings{83670bf4f5604f95b19c1a1aa752c745,
title = "Big Data Clinical Research: Validity, Ethics, and Regulation",
abstract = "Electronic Health Records (EHR) promise improvement for patient care and also offer great value for biomedical research including clinical, public health, and health services research. Unfortunately, the full potential of EHR big data research has remained largely unrealized. The purpose of this study was to identify rate limiting factors, and develop recommendations to better balance unrestricted extramural EHR access with legitimate safeguarding of EHR data in retrospective research. By exploring primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, this review identifies external constraints and provides a comparative analysis of social influencers in retrospective EHR-based research. Results indicate that EHRs have the advantage of reflecting the reality of patient care but also show a frequency of between 4.3-86{\%} of incomplete and inaccurate data in various fields. The rapid spread of alternative analytics for health data challenges traditional interpretations of confidentiality protections. A confusing multiplicity of controls creates barriers to big data EHR research. More research on the use of EHR big data is likely to improve accuracy and validity. Information governance and research approval processes should be simplified. Comprehensive regulatory policies that do not exclusively cover health care entities, are needed. Finally, new computing safeguards are needed to address public concerns, like research access only to aggregate data and not to individually identifiable information.",
keywords = "Clinical Research, Electronic Health Records, Health Services Research, Public Health",
author = "Balas, {E Andrew} and Vernon, {Marlo M Cavnar} and Farah Magrabi and Gordon, {Lynne Thomas} and Joanne Sexton",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-448",
language = "English (US)",
series = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",
publisher = "IOS Press",
pages = "448--452",
editor = "Andrew Georgiou and Sarkar, {Indra Neil} and {de Azevedo Marques}, {Paulo Mazzoncini}",
booktitle = "MEDINFO 2015",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Big Data Clinical Research

T2 - Validity, Ethics, and Regulation

AU - Balas, E Andrew

AU - Vernon, Marlo M Cavnar

AU - Magrabi, Farah

AU - Gordon, Lynne Thomas

AU - Sexton, Joanne

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Electronic Health Records (EHR) promise improvement for patient care and also offer great value for biomedical research including clinical, public health, and health services research. Unfortunately, the full potential of EHR big data research has remained largely unrealized. The purpose of this study was to identify rate limiting factors, and develop recommendations to better balance unrestricted extramural EHR access with legitimate safeguarding of EHR data in retrospective research. By exploring primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, this review identifies external constraints and provides a comparative analysis of social influencers in retrospective EHR-based research. Results indicate that EHRs have the advantage of reflecting the reality of patient care but also show a frequency of between 4.3-86% of incomplete and inaccurate data in various fields. The rapid spread of alternative analytics for health data challenges traditional interpretations of confidentiality protections. A confusing multiplicity of controls creates barriers to big data EHR research. More research on the use of EHR big data is likely to improve accuracy and validity. Information governance and research approval processes should be simplified. Comprehensive regulatory policies that do not exclusively cover health care entities, are needed. Finally, new computing safeguards are needed to address public concerns, like research access only to aggregate data and not to individually identifiable information.

AB - Electronic Health Records (EHR) promise improvement for patient care and also offer great value for biomedical research including clinical, public health, and health services research. Unfortunately, the full potential of EHR big data research has remained largely unrealized. The purpose of this study was to identify rate limiting factors, and develop recommendations to better balance unrestricted extramural EHR access with legitimate safeguarding of EHR data in retrospective research. By exploring primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, this review identifies external constraints and provides a comparative analysis of social influencers in retrospective EHR-based research. Results indicate that EHRs have the advantage of reflecting the reality of patient care but also show a frequency of between 4.3-86% of incomplete and inaccurate data in various fields. The rapid spread of alternative analytics for health data challenges traditional interpretations of confidentiality protections. A confusing multiplicity of controls creates barriers to big data EHR research. More research on the use of EHR big data is likely to improve accuracy and validity. Information governance and research approval processes should be simplified. Comprehensive regulatory policies that do not exclusively cover health care entities, are needed. Finally, new computing safeguards are needed to address public concerns, like research access only to aggregate data and not to individually identifiable information.

KW - Clinical Research

KW - Electronic Health Records

KW - Health Services Research

KW - Public Health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951964359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951964359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-448

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-448

M3 - Conference contribution

T3 - Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

SP - 448

EP - 452

BT - MEDINFO 2015

A2 - Georgiou, Andrew

A2 - Sarkar, Indra Neil

A2 - de Azevedo Marques, Paulo Mazzoncini

PB - IOS Press

ER -