Bilateral medialization laryngoplasty

Gregory N Postma, P. D. Blalock, J. A. Koufman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To present indications, techniques, and results of bilateral medialization laryngoplasty (BML). Study Design: Retrospective review of 39 consecutive patients who had BML for correction of glottal insufficiency attributable to presbylaryngis (n = 16), bilateral vocal fold paresis (n = 13), unilateral paralysis with contralateral bowing (n = 4), and other miscellaneous neurologic diseases (n = 6). Methods: Complete preoperative and postoperative clinical and acoustical data were analyzed for 74% (29/39) of the subjects. All 39 subjects completed a patient survey to assess their long-term outcomes. Results: Overall, 90% (35/39) of the patients who had BML experienced significant improvement in voice and swallowing function. Subsequently, 36% (14/39) of the patients underwent adjunctive lipoinjection for closure of small residual glottal gaps (vocal 'fine-tuning'). Of the BML patients (with or without lipoinjection) who had complete preoperative and postoperative voice data, 83% (24/29) had complete glottal closure after surgery, resulting in normal or near-normal voices. Eighty-five percent (33/39) of the patients responded that they 'would have surgery again.' Of the six patients who said that they would not have surgery again, three had good results and one had progressive neurologic disease. The mean duration of follow-up was 17 months. Conclusions: BML is an effective rehabilitative surgical treatment for symptomatic vocal fold bowing. In addition, lipoinjection is useful as an adjunct to BML to enhance the voice outcome in selected cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1429-1434
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume108
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 21 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laryngoplasty
Vocal Cords
Nervous System Diseases
Paresis
Deglutition
Paralysis
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Bilateral medialization laryngoplasty. / Postma, Gregory N; Blalock, P. D.; Koufman, J. A.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 108, No. 10, 21.10.1998, p. 1429-1434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Postma, GN, Blalock, PD & Koufman, JA 1998, 'Bilateral medialization laryngoplasty', Laryngoscope, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 1429-1434. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199810000-00002
Postma, Gregory N ; Blalock, P. D. ; Koufman, J. A. / Bilateral medialization laryngoplasty. In: Laryngoscope. 1998 ; Vol. 108, No. 10. pp. 1429-1434.
@article{d48c02ddb6be4ba7af9cc730fe7968e3,
title = "Bilateral medialization laryngoplasty",
abstract = "Objectives: To present indications, techniques, and results of bilateral medialization laryngoplasty (BML). Study Design: Retrospective review of 39 consecutive patients who had BML for correction of glottal insufficiency attributable to presbylaryngis (n = 16), bilateral vocal fold paresis (n = 13), unilateral paralysis with contralateral bowing (n = 4), and other miscellaneous neurologic diseases (n = 6). Methods: Complete preoperative and postoperative clinical and acoustical data were analyzed for 74{\%} (29/39) of the subjects. All 39 subjects completed a patient survey to assess their long-term outcomes. Results: Overall, 90{\%} (35/39) of the patients who had BML experienced significant improvement in voice and swallowing function. Subsequently, 36{\%} (14/39) of the patients underwent adjunctive lipoinjection for closure of small residual glottal gaps (vocal 'fine-tuning'). Of the BML patients (with or without lipoinjection) who had complete preoperative and postoperative voice data, 83{\%} (24/29) had complete glottal closure after surgery, resulting in normal or near-normal voices. Eighty-five percent (33/39) of the patients responded that they 'would have surgery again.' Of the six patients who said that they would not have surgery again, three had good results and one had progressive neurologic disease. The mean duration of follow-up was 17 months. Conclusions: BML is an effective rehabilitative surgical treatment for symptomatic vocal fold bowing. In addition, lipoinjection is useful as an adjunct to BML to enhance the voice outcome in selected cases.",
author = "Postma, {Gregory N} and Blalock, {P. D.} and Koufman, {J. A.}",
year = "1998",
month = "10",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1097/00005537-199810000-00002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "108",
pages = "1429--1434",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bilateral medialization laryngoplasty

AU - Postma, Gregory N

AU - Blalock, P. D.

AU - Koufman, J. A.

PY - 1998/10/21

Y1 - 1998/10/21

N2 - Objectives: To present indications, techniques, and results of bilateral medialization laryngoplasty (BML). Study Design: Retrospective review of 39 consecutive patients who had BML for correction of glottal insufficiency attributable to presbylaryngis (n = 16), bilateral vocal fold paresis (n = 13), unilateral paralysis with contralateral bowing (n = 4), and other miscellaneous neurologic diseases (n = 6). Methods: Complete preoperative and postoperative clinical and acoustical data were analyzed for 74% (29/39) of the subjects. All 39 subjects completed a patient survey to assess their long-term outcomes. Results: Overall, 90% (35/39) of the patients who had BML experienced significant improvement in voice and swallowing function. Subsequently, 36% (14/39) of the patients underwent adjunctive lipoinjection for closure of small residual glottal gaps (vocal 'fine-tuning'). Of the BML patients (with or without lipoinjection) who had complete preoperative and postoperative voice data, 83% (24/29) had complete glottal closure after surgery, resulting in normal or near-normal voices. Eighty-five percent (33/39) of the patients responded that they 'would have surgery again.' Of the six patients who said that they would not have surgery again, three had good results and one had progressive neurologic disease. The mean duration of follow-up was 17 months. Conclusions: BML is an effective rehabilitative surgical treatment for symptomatic vocal fold bowing. In addition, lipoinjection is useful as an adjunct to BML to enhance the voice outcome in selected cases.

AB - Objectives: To present indications, techniques, and results of bilateral medialization laryngoplasty (BML). Study Design: Retrospective review of 39 consecutive patients who had BML for correction of glottal insufficiency attributable to presbylaryngis (n = 16), bilateral vocal fold paresis (n = 13), unilateral paralysis with contralateral bowing (n = 4), and other miscellaneous neurologic diseases (n = 6). Methods: Complete preoperative and postoperative clinical and acoustical data were analyzed for 74% (29/39) of the subjects. All 39 subjects completed a patient survey to assess their long-term outcomes. Results: Overall, 90% (35/39) of the patients who had BML experienced significant improvement in voice and swallowing function. Subsequently, 36% (14/39) of the patients underwent adjunctive lipoinjection for closure of small residual glottal gaps (vocal 'fine-tuning'). Of the BML patients (with or without lipoinjection) who had complete preoperative and postoperative voice data, 83% (24/29) had complete glottal closure after surgery, resulting in normal or near-normal voices. Eighty-five percent (33/39) of the patients responded that they 'would have surgery again.' Of the six patients who said that they would not have surgery again, three had good results and one had progressive neurologic disease. The mean duration of follow-up was 17 months. Conclusions: BML is an effective rehabilitative surgical treatment for symptomatic vocal fold bowing. In addition, lipoinjection is useful as an adjunct to BML to enhance the voice outcome in selected cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031686592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031686592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005537-199810000-00002

DO - 10.1097/00005537-199810000-00002

M3 - Article

C2 - 9778278

AN - SCOPUS:0031686592

VL - 108

SP - 1429

EP - 1434

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 10

ER -