Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making

A vignette study

Michael Edward Stefanek, Cheryl Enger, Judith Benkendorf, Susan Flamm Honig, Caryn Lerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Little is known about the perception of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM), and whether perceptions are influenced by a family history of breast cancer. It is also unclear what factors may play a role in selecting BPM for follow-up care. Methods. Samples of predominantly Caucasian, well-educated women with (n = 129) and without (n = 104) family histories of breast cancer were provided a vignette of a woman at increased risk. They selected one of two follow-up options: (1) clinical breast examination, breast self exam, and annual mammography or (2) BPM. Results. The samples did not differ on the decision to select BPM (29.5% vs 22.1%). The family history sample reported worry about breast cancer as a problem (34.4%) more often than women with no history (15.7%). Multivariate analysis found worry and estimated 10-year risk of the woman in the vignette as significant predictors of selecting BPM. Conclusions. Approximately 25% of our sample selected BPM as the preferred option. The majority supported the need to discuss BPM among women at increased risk. Finally, both factors associated with the selection of BPM (worry, risk assessment) are potentially amenable to psychosocial or educational approaches. There is a clear need for assessment of worry and risk perception prior to surgical decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-221
Number of pages6
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Breast Neoplasms
Breast Self-Examination
Aftercare
Needs Assessment
Prophylactic Mastectomy
Mammography
Breast
Multivariate Analysis
History

Keywords

  • Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy
  • Breast cancer
  • Family history
  • Risk perception
  • Worry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Stefanek, M. E., Enger, C., Benkendorf, J., Flamm Honig, S., & Lerman, C. (1999). Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making: A vignette study. Preventive Medicine, 29(3), 216-221. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0524

Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making : A vignette study. / Stefanek, Michael Edward; Enger, Cheryl; Benkendorf, Judith; Flamm Honig, Susan; Lerman, Caryn.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.01.1999, p. 216-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stefanek, ME, Enger, C, Benkendorf, J, Flamm Honig, S & Lerman, C 1999, 'Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making: A vignette study', Preventive Medicine, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 216-221. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0524
Stefanek ME, Enger C, Benkendorf J, Flamm Honig S, Lerman C. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making: A vignette study. Preventive Medicine. 1999 Jan 1;29(3):216-221. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0524
Stefanek, Michael Edward ; Enger, Cheryl ; Benkendorf, Judith ; Flamm Honig, Susan ; Lerman, Caryn. / Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making : A vignette study. In: Preventive Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 216-221.
@article{8064d666895a4a8c92e7f89e8ced1ef6,
title = "Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making: A vignette study",
abstract = "Background. Little is known about the perception of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM), and whether perceptions are influenced by a family history of breast cancer. It is also unclear what factors may play a role in selecting BPM for follow-up care. Methods. Samples of predominantly Caucasian, well-educated women with (n = 129) and without (n = 104) family histories of breast cancer were provided a vignette of a woman at increased risk. They selected one of two follow-up options: (1) clinical breast examination, breast self exam, and annual mammography or (2) BPM. Results. The samples did not differ on the decision to select BPM (29.5{\%} vs 22.1{\%}). The family history sample reported worry about breast cancer as a problem (34.4{\%}) more often than women with no history (15.7{\%}). Multivariate analysis found worry and estimated 10-year risk of the woman in the vignette as significant predictors of selecting BPM. Conclusions. Approximately 25{\%} of our sample selected BPM as the preferred option. The majority supported the need to discuss BPM among women at increased risk. Finally, both factors associated with the selection of BPM (worry, risk assessment) are potentially amenable to psychosocial or educational approaches. There is a clear need for assessment of worry and risk perception prior to surgical decision making.",
keywords = "Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, Breast cancer, Family history, Risk perception, Worry",
author = "Stefanek, {Michael Edward} and Cheryl Enger and Judith Benkendorf and {Flamm Honig}, Susan and Caryn Lerman",
year = "1999",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/pmed.1999.0524",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "216--221",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy decision making

T2 - A vignette study

AU - Stefanek, Michael Edward

AU - Enger, Cheryl

AU - Benkendorf, Judith

AU - Flamm Honig, Susan

AU - Lerman, Caryn

PY - 1999/1/1

Y1 - 1999/1/1

N2 - Background. Little is known about the perception of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM), and whether perceptions are influenced by a family history of breast cancer. It is also unclear what factors may play a role in selecting BPM for follow-up care. Methods. Samples of predominantly Caucasian, well-educated women with (n = 129) and without (n = 104) family histories of breast cancer were provided a vignette of a woman at increased risk. They selected one of two follow-up options: (1) clinical breast examination, breast self exam, and annual mammography or (2) BPM. Results. The samples did not differ on the decision to select BPM (29.5% vs 22.1%). The family history sample reported worry about breast cancer as a problem (34.4%) more often than women with no history (15.7%). Multivariate analysis found worry and estimated 10-year risk of the woman in the vignette as significant predictors of selecting BPM. Conclusions. Approximately 25% of our sample selected BPM as the preferred option. The majority supported the need to discuss BPM among women at increased risk. Finally, both factors associated with the selection of BPM (worry, risk assessment) are potentially amenable to psychosocial or educational approaches. There is a clear need for assessment of worry and risk perception prior to surgical decision making.

AB - Background. Little is known about the perception of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM), and whether perceptions are influenced by a family history of breast cancer. It is also unclear what factors may play a role in selecting BPM for follow-up care. Methods. Samples of predominantly Caucasian, well-educated women with (n = 129) and without (n = 104) family histories of breast cancer were provided a vignette of a woman at increased risk. They selected one of two follow-up options: (1) clinical breast examination, breast self exam, and annual mammography or (2) BPM. Results. The samples did not differ on the decision to select BPM (29.5% vs 22.1%). The family history sample reported worry about breast cancer as a problem (34.4%) more often than women with no history (15.7%). Multivariate analysis found worry and estimated 10-year risk of the woman in the vignette as significant predictors of selecting BPM. Conclusions. Approximately 25% of our sample selected BPM as the preferred option. The majority supported the need to discuss BPM among women at increased risk. Finally, both factors associated with the selection of BPM (worry, risk assessment) are potentially amenable to psychosocial or educational approaches. There is a clear need for assessment of worry and risk perception prior to surgical decision making.

KW - Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Family history

KW - Risk perception

KW - Worry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032866404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032866404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/pmed.1999.0524

DO - 10.1006/pmed.1999.0524

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 216

EP - 221

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 3

ER -