Bishop score

A poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery

Nancy W. Hendrix, Suneet P. Chauhan, John G. Morrison, Everett F. Magann, James N. Martin, Lawrence D Devoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. We evaluated the accuracy of the Bishop score in predicting the likelihood of successful labor induction (entry into active phase) in nulliparous and multiparous women. Methods. During an index year, all patients having induction of labor and a preinduction Bishop score were included in a standard protocol for cervical ripening and use of oxytocin. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for Bishop scores (0 to 11) to predict abdominal delivery for failed induction (final cervical dilation <4 cm) versus vaginal delivery. Results. Parturients who had vaginal delivery (n = 253) and those in whom attempted induction failed (n = 38) did not differ significantly with respect to maternal demographics, length of gestation, Bishop score and its distribution, and infant birth weight. The area under the ROC curve did not differ significantly from the area under the nondiagnostic line. Conclusion. The Bishop score appears to be a poor predictor of the outcome of labor induction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)248-252
Number of pages5
JournalSouthern Medical Journal
Volume91
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

Induced Labor
Routine Diagnostic Tests
ROC Curve
Cervical Ripening
Oxytocin
Birth Weight
Cesarean Section
Dilatation
Mothers
Demography
Parturition
Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Bishop score : A poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. / Hendrix, Nancy W.; Chauhan, Suneet P.; Morrison, John G.; Magann, Everett F.; Martin, James N.; Devoe, Lawrence D.

In: Southern Medical Journal, Vol. 91, No. 3, 01.01.1998, p. 248-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hendrix, Nancy W. ; Chauhan, Suneet P. ; Morrison, John G. ; Magann, Everett F. ; Martin, James N. ; Devoe, Lawrence D. / Bishop score : A poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery. In: Southern Medical Journal. 1998 ; Vol. 91, No. 3. pp. 248-252.
@article{7f4cd1742d0148a28ba08688449d2942,
title = "Bishop score: A poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery",
abstract = "Background. We evaluated the accuracy of the Bishop score in predicting the likelihood of successful labor induction (entry into active phase) in nulliparous and multiparous women. Methods. During an index year, all patients having induction of labor and a preinduction Bishop score were included in a standard protocol for cervical ripening and use of oxytocin. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for Bishop scores (0 to 11) to predict abdominal delivery for failed induction (final cervical dilation <4 cm) versus vaginal delivery. Results. Parturients who had vaginal delivery (n = 253) and those in whom attempted induction failed (n = 38) did not differ significantly with respect to maternal demographics, length of gestation, Bishop score and its distribution, and infant birth weight. The area under the ROC curve did not differ significantly from the area under the nondiagnostic line. Conclusion. The Bishop score appears to be a poor predictor of the outcome of labor induction.",
author = "Hendrix, {Nancy W.} and Chauhan, {Suneet P.} and Morrison, {John G.} and Magann, {Everett F.} and Martin, {James N.} and Devoe, {Lawrence D}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00007611-199803000-00006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "248--252",
journal = "Southern Medical Journal",
issn = "0038-4348",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bishop score

T2 - A poor diagnostic test to predict failed induction versus vaginal delivery

AU - Hendrix, Nancy W.

AU - Chauhan, Suneet P.

AU - Morrison, John G.

AU - Magann, Everett F.

AU - Martin, James N.

AU - Devoe, Lawrence D

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - Background. We evaluated the accuracy of the Bishop score in predicting the likelihood of successful labor induction (entry into active phase) in nulliparous and multiparous women. Methods. During an index year, all patients having induction of labor and a preinduction Bishop score were included in a standard protocol for cervical ripening and use of oxytocin. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for Bishop scores (0 to 11) to predict abdominal delivery for failed induction (final cervical dilation <4 cm) versus vaginal delivery. Results. Parturients who had vaginal delivery (n = 253) and those in whom attempted induction failed (n = 38) did not differ significantly with respect to maternal demographics, length of gestation, Bishop score and its distribution, and infant birth weight. The area under the ROC curve did not differ significantly from the area under the nondiagnostic line. Conclusion. The Bishop score appears to be a poor predictor of the outcome of labor induction.

AB - Background. We evaluated the accuracy of the Bishop score in predicting the likelihood of successful labor induction (entry into active phase) in nulliparous and multiparous women. Methods. During an index year, all patients having induction of labor and a preinduction Bishop score were included in a standard protocol for cervical ripening and use of oxytocin. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for Bishop scores (0 to 11) to predict abdominal delivery for failed induction (final cervical dilation <4 cm) versus vaginal delivery. Results. Parturients who had vaginal delivery (n = 253) and those in whom attempted induction failed (n = 38) did not differ significantly with respect to maternal demographics, length of gestation, Bishop score and its distribution, and infant birth weight. The area under the ROC curve did not differ significantly from the area under the nondiagnostic line. Conclusion. The Bishop score appears to be a poor predictor of the outcome of labor induction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031979105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031979105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007611-199803000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00007611-199803000-00006

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 248

EP - 252

JO - Southern Medical Journal

JF - Southern Medical Journal

SN - 0038-4348

IS - 3

ER -