Blood flow surveillance of hemodialysis grafts and the dysfunction hypothesis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is widely recommended that hemodialysis graft surveillance programs should be implemented and that significant stenosis should be corrected when it is accompanied by graft dysfunction. The rationale for surveillance depends on the dysfunction hypothesis, which states that stenosis causes graft dysfunction [such as a decrease in graft blood flow (Qa)], and this dysfunction reliably precedes and accurately predicts thrombosis. The usefulness of Qa surveillance depends on accurate prediction of thrombosis so that stenosis can be corrected prior to thrombosis. An analysis of the dysfunction hypothesis indicates that some or all of its underlying assumptions are invalid. Most importantly, the presence of wide hemodynamic variation during Qa measurements makes Qa a relatively inaccurate predictor of throm-bosis. A number of studies have evaluated the value of surveillance with intervention in reducing thrombosis rates and prolonging graft life. Review of these studies show that few have been prospective and randomized, and many have included historical control groups. It is debatable whether these studies have established that Qa surveillance with intervention should be applied to all grafts. Data from several studies suggest that severity of stenosis may be at least as accurate as Qa in predicting thrombosis. Consequently, inclusion of stenosis measurements (e.g., by duplex ultrasound) may improve the results of surveillance. These unresolved issues indicate it is premature to recommend routine Qa surveillance with intervention of all hemodialysis patients with grafts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-180
Number of pages6
JournalSeminars in dialysis
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Renal Dialysis
Transplants
Pathologic Constriction
Thrombosis
Hemodynamics
Control Groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology

Cite this

Blood flow surveillance of hemodialysis grafts and the dysfunction hypothesis. / Paulson, William D.

In: Seminars in dialysis, Vol. 14, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 175-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f20900f6581f407d9d91c283babcd6c6,
title = "Blood flow surveillance of hemodialysis grafts and the dysfunction hypothesis",
abstract = "It is widely recommended that hemodialysis graft surveillance programs should be implemented and that significant stenosis should be corrected when it is accompanied by graft dysfunction. The rationale for surveillance depends on the dysfunction hypothesis, which states that stenosis causes graft dysfunction [such as a decrease in graft blood flow (Qa)], and this dysfunction reliably precedes and accurately predicts thrombosis. The usefulness of Qa surveillance depends on accurate prediction of thrombosis so that stenosis can be corrected prior to thrombosis. An analysis of the dysfunction hypothesis indicates that some or all of its underlying assumptions are invalid. Most importantly, the presence of wide hemodynamic variation during Qa measurements makes Qa a relatively inaccurate predictor of throm-bosis. A number of studies have evaluated the value of surveillance with intervention in reducing thrombosis rates and prolonging graft life. Review of these studies show that few have been prospective and randomized, and many have included historical control groups. It is debatable whether these studies have established that Qa surveillance with intervention should be applied to all grafts. Data from several studies suggest that severity of stenosis may be at least as accurate as Qa in predicting thrombosis. Consequently, inclusion of stenosis measurements (e.g., by duplex ultrasound) may improve the results of surveillance. These unresolved issues indicate it is premature to recommend routine Qa surveillance with intervention of all hemodialysis patients with grafts.",
author = "Paulson, {William D.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-139X.2001.00049.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "175--180",
journal = "Seminars in Dialysis",
issn = "0894-0959",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blood flow surveillance of hemodialysis grafts and the dysfunction hypothesis

AU - Paulson, William D.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - It is widely recommended that hemodialysis graft surveillance programs should be implemented and that significant stenosis should be corrected when it is accompanied by graft dysfunction. The rationale for surveillance depends on the dysfunction hypothesis, which states that stenosis causes graft dysfunction [such as a decrease in graft blood flow (Qa)], and this dysfunction reliably precedes and accurately predicts thrombosis. The usefulness of Qa surveillance depends on accurate prediction of thrombosis so that stenosis can be corrected prior to thrombosis. An analysis of the dysfunction hypothesis indicates that some or all of its underlying assumptions are invalid. Most importantly, the presence of wide hemodynamic variation during Qa measurements makes Qa a relatively inaccurate predictor of throm-bosis. A number of studies have evaluated the value of surveillance with intervention in reducing thrombosis rates and prolonging graft life. Review of these studies show that few have been prospective and randomized, and many have included historical control groups. It is debatable whether these studies have established that Qa surveillance with intervention should be applied to all grafts. Data from several studies suggest that severity of stenosis may be at least as accurate as Qa in predicting thrombosis. Consequently, inclusion of stenosis measurements (e.g., by duplex ultrasound) may improve the results of surveillance. These unresolved issues indicate it is premature to recommend routine Qa surveillance with intervention of all hemodialysis patients with grafts.

AB - It is widely recommended that hemodialysis graft surveillance programs should be implemented and that significant stenosis should be corrected when it is accompanied by graft dysfunction. The rationale for surveillance depends on the dysfunction hypothesis, which states that stenosis causes graft dysfunction [such as a decrease in graft blood flow (Qa)], and this dysfunction reliably precedes and accurately predicts thrombosis. The usefulness of Qa surveillance depends on accurate prediction of thrombosis so that stenosis can be corrected prior to thrombosis. An analysis of the dysfunction hypothesis indicates that some or all of its underlying assumptions are invalid. Most importantly, the presence of wide hemodynamic variation during Qa measurements makes Qa a relatively inaccurate predictor of throm-bosis. A number of studies have evaluated the value of surveillance with intervention in reducing thrombosis rates and prolonging graft life. Review of these studies show that few have been prospective and randomized, and many have included historical control groups. It is debatable whether these studies have established that Qa surveillance with intervention should be applied to all grafts. Data from several studies suggest that severity of stenosis may be at least as accurate as Qa in predicting thrombosis. Consequently, inclusion of stenosis measurements (e.g., by duplex ultrasound) may improve the results of surveillance. These unresolved issues indicate it is premature to recommend routine Qa surveillance with intervention of all hemodialysis patients with grafts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035346324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035346324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-139X.2001.00049.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-139X.2001.00049.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 11422923

AN - SCOPUS:0035346324

VL - 14

SP - 175

EP - 180

JO - Seminars in Dialysis

JF - Seminars in Dialysis

SN - 0894-0959

IS - 3

ER -