Can biofeedback therapy improve anorectal function in fecal incontinence?

Satish Sanku Chander Rao, Kimberly D. Welcher, Janet Happel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although biofeedback treatment ameliorates symptoms in patients with fecal incontinence, whether it improves anorectal function is unclear. Aim: To examine prospectively whether biofeedback therapy influences objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function and whether it improves outcome. Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients (females = 17) with fecal incontinence for over 1 year, underwent a three-phase outpatient treatment program. This program consisted of pelvic muscle strengthening exercises (phase 1), 1-h biofeedback therapy sessions twice a week (phase 2), and reinforcement sessions at 6 wk, 3, 6, and 12 months (phase 3). The number of sessions in phase 2 were customized for each patient. Anorectal manometry, saline continence test, prospective stool diaries, and bowel satisfaction scores were used to assess the changes in bowel function before and 1 year after therapy. Results: After biofeedback therapy, the anal squeeze sphincter pressure (p < 0.05), the duration of squeeze (p < 0.001), and the capacity to retain liquids (p < 0.05) increased. Rectoanal coordination also improved with a reduction (p < 0.001) in rectal pressure and an increase (p < 0.05) in the continence index. Threshold volumes fur first perception and desire to defecate decreased (p < 0.05). The number of therapy sessions varied, mean (range) = 7 (4-13). Stool frequency and the number of incontinence episodes decreased (p < 0.001). Bowel satisfaction score improved (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Biofeedback therapy is effective and improves objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function in patients with fecal incontinence. Customizing the number of sessions and providing periodic reinforcement may improve the success rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2360-2366
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume91
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fecal Incontinence
Therapeutics
Pressure
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Manometry
Anal Canal
Outpatients
Exercise
Muscles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Can biofeedback therapy improve anorectal function in fecal incontinence? / Rao, Satish Sanku Chander; Welcher, Kimberly D.; Happel, Janet.

In: American Journal of Gastroenterology, Vol. 91, No. 11, 01.11.1996, p. 2360-2366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b2d8295d06e84de2a2a4d41e4587a00c,
title = "Can biofeedback therapy improve anorectal function in fecal incontinence?",
abstract = "Background: Although biofeedback treatment ameliorates symptoms in patients with fecal incontinence, whether it improves anorectal function is unclear. Aim: To examine prospectively whether biofeedback therapy influences objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function and whether it improves outcome. Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients (females = 17) with fecal incontinence for over 1 year, underwent a three-phase outpatient treatment program. This program consisted of pelvic muscle strengthening exercises (phase 1), 1-h biofeedback therapy sessions twice a week (phase 2), and reinforcement sessions at 6 wk, 3, 6, and 12 months (phase 3). The number of sessions in phase 2 were customized for each patient. Anorectal manometry, saline continence test, prospective stool diaries, and bowel satisfaction scores were used to assess the changes in bowel function before and 1 year after therapy. Results: After biofeedback therapy, the anal squeeze sphincter pressure (p < 0.05), the duration of squeeze (p < 0.001), and the capacity to retain liquids (p < 0.05) increased. Rectoanal coordination also improved with a reduction (p < 0.001) in rectal pressure and an increase (p < 0.05) in the continence index. Threshold volumes fur first perception and desire to defecate decreased (p < 0.05). The number of therapy sessions varied, mean (range) = 7 (4-13). Stool frequency and the number of incontinence episodes decreased (p < 0.001). Bowel satisfaction score improved (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Biofeedback therapy is effective and improves objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function in patients with fecal incontinence. Customizing the number of sessions and providing periodic reinforcement may improve the success rate.",
author = "Rao, {Satish Sanku Chander} and Welcher, {Kimberly D.} and Janet Happel",
year = "1996",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "2360--2366",
journal = "American Journal of Gastroenterology",
issn = "0002-9270",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can biofeedback therapy improve anorectal function in fecal incontinence?

AU - Rao, Satish Sanku Chander

AU - Welcher, Kimberly D.

AU - Happel, Janet

PY - 1996/11/1

Y1 - 1996/11/1

N2 - Background: Although biofeedback treatment ameliorates symptoms in patients with fecal incontinence, whether it improves anorectal function is unclear. Aim: To examine prospectively whether biofeedback therapy influences objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function and whether it improves outcome. Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients (females = 17) with fecal incontinence for over 1 year, underwent a three-phase outpatient treatment program. This program consisted of pelvic muscle strengthening exercises (phase 1), 1-h biofeedback therapy sessions twice a week (phase 2), and reinforcement sessions at 6 wk, 3, 6, and 12 months (phase 3). The number of sessions in phase 2 were customized for each patient. Anorectal manometry, saline continence test, prospective stool diaries, and bowel satisfaction scores were used to assess the changes in bowel function before and 1 year after therapy. Results: After biofeedback therapy, the anal squeeze sphincter pressure (p < 0.05), the duration of squeeze (p < 0.001), and the capacity to retain liquids (p < 0.05) increased. Rectoanal coordination also improved with a reduction (p < 0.001) in rectal pressure and an increase (p < 0.05) in the continence index. Threshold volumes fur first perception and desire to defecate decreased (p < 0.05). The number of therapy sessions varied, mean (range) = 7 (4-13). Stool frequency and the number of incontinence episodes decreased (p < 0.001). Bowel satisfaction score improved (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Biofeedback therapy is effective and improves objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function in patients with fecal incontinence. Customizing the number of sessions and providing periodic reinforcement may improve the success rate.

AB - Background: Although biofeedback treatment ameliorates symptoms in patients with fecal incontinence, whether it improves anorectal function is unclear. Aim: To examine prospectively whether biofeedback therapy influences objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function and whether it improves outcome. Methods: Nineteen consecutive patients (females = 17) with fecal incontinence for over 1 year, underwent a three-phase outpatient treatment program. This program consisted of pelvic muscle strengthening exercises (phase 1), 1-h biofeedback therapy sessions twice a week (phase 2), and reinforcement sessions at 6 wk, 3, 6, and 12 months (phase 3). The number of sessions in phase 2 were customized for each patient. Anorectal manometry, saline continence test, prospective stool diaries, and bowel satisfaction scores were used to assess the changes in bowel function before and 1 year after therapy. Results: After biofeedback therapy, the anal squeeze sphincter pressure (p < 0.05), the duration of squeeze (p < 0.001), and the capacity to retain liquids (p < 0.05) increased. Rectoanal coordination also improved with a reduction (p < 0.001) in rectal pressure and an increase (p < 0.05) in the continence index. Threshold volumes fur first perception and desire to defecate decreased (p < 0.05). The number of therapy sessions varied, mean (range) = 7 (4-13). Stool frequency and the number of incontinence episodes decreased (p < 0.001). Bowel satisfaction score improved (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Biofeedback therapy is effective and improves objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function in patients with fecal incontinence. Customizing the number of sessions and providing periodic reinforcement may improve the success rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029841709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029841709&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 2360

EP - 2366

JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology

JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology

SN - 0002-9270

IS - 11

ER -