Can renewal happen without removal? Case study of a poor black neighborhood on the rebound

Wesley Meares, John I. Gilderbloom, Gregory D. Squires, Tobin Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

During the latter half of the twentieth century, many inner city neighborhoods with majority black/African American populations fell into decline, neglect, and crime. East Russell, an inner city neighborhood in Louisville, Kentucky, was no different. It was ranked as one of the most dangerous and impoverished neighborhoods in the USA. In 1992, with no previous precedent, community leaders wanted “renewal” without population displacement. Currently, scholars question if “renewal” can happen without removal. We examine the East Russell case to better understand this possibility. Utilizing data from the Jefferson County Property Valuation Administration, the US Census Bureau, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, and a recent neighborhood charrette, we examine the conditions of the neighborhood from 1992 to 2012. We find that the efforts of the revitalization did have some successes: 575 housing units were renovated, homeownership increased, property valuations increased, crime rates declined sharply, single automobile usage fell, foreclosures were among the lowest in the city, and employment increased. While revitalization brought benefits, there are still issues that need to be addressed. Our findings contribute to the current debate that this type of place-based policy is possible without population dispersal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-132
Number of pages22
JournalCommunity Development
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2015

Fingerprint

crime
valuation
homeownership
foreclosure
crime rate
African American
housing development
twentieth century
urban development
motor vehicle
neglect
automobile
census
housing
removal
offense
leader
community
inner city
rate

Keywords

  • community development
  • revitalization
  • urban renewal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Can renewal happen without removal? Case study of a poor black neighborhood on the rebound. / Meares, Wesley; Gilderbloom, John I.; Squires, Gregory D.; Williamson, Tobin.

In: Community Development, Vol. 46, No. 2, 15.03.2015, p. 111-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meares, Wesley ; Gilderbloom, John I. ; Squires, Gregory D. ; Williamson, Tobin. / Can renewal happen without removal? Case study of a poor black neighborhood on the rebound. In: Community Development. 2015 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 111-132.
@article{e03f9e27fda441f9a1a759008504eceb,
title = "Can renewal happen without removal? Case study of a poor black neighborhood on the rebound",
abstract = "During the latter half of the twentieth century, many inner city neighborhoods with majority black/African American populations fell into decline, neglect, and crime. East Russell, an inner city neighborhood in Louisville, Kentucky, was no different. It was ranked as one of the most dangerous and impoverished neighborhoods in the USA. In 1992, with no previous precedent, community leaders wanted “renewal” without population displacement. Currently, scholars question if “renewal” can happen without removal. We examine the East Russell case to better understand this possibility. Utilizing data from the Jefferson County Property Valuation Administration, the US Census Bureau, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, and a recent neighborhood charrette, we examine the conditions of the neighborhood from 1992 to 2012. We find that the efforts of the revitalization did have some successes: 575 housing units were renovated, homeownership increased, property valuations increased, crime rates declined sharply, single automobile usage fell, foreclosures were among the lowest in the city, and employment increased. While revitalization brought benefits, there are still issues that need to be addressed. Our findings contribute to the current debate that this type of place-based policy is possible without population dispersal.",
keywords = "community development, revitalization, urban renewal",
author = "Wesley Meares and Gilderbloom, {John I.} and Squires, {Gregory D.} and Tobin Williamson",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/15575330.2015.1008533",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "111--132",
journal = "Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society",
issn = "1557-5330",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can renewal happen without removal? Case study of a poor black neighborhood on the rebound

AU - Meares, Wesley

AU - Gilderbloom, John I.

AU - Squires, Gregory D.

AU - Williamson, Tobin

PY - 2015/3/15

Y1 - 2015/3/15

N2 - During the latter half of the twentieth century, many inner city neighborhoods with majority black/African American populations fell into decline, neglect, and crime. East Russell, an inner city neighborhood in Louisville, Kentucky, was no different. It was ranked as one of the most dangerous and impoverished neighborhoods in the USA. In 1992, with no previous precedent, community leaders wanted “renewal” without population displacement. Currently, scholars question if “renewal” can happen without removal. We examine the East Russell case to better understand this possibility. Utilizing data from the Jefferson County Property Valuation Administration, the US Census Bureau, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, and a recent neighborhood charrette, we examine the conditions of the neighborhood from 1992 to 2012. We find that the efforts of the revitalization did have some successes: 575 housing units were renovated, homeownership increased, property valuations increased, crime rates declined sharply, single automobile usage fell, foreclosures were among the lowest in the city, and employment increased. While revitalization brought benefits, there are still issues that need to be addressed. Our findings contribute to the current debate that this type of place-based policy is possible without population dispersal.

AB - During the latter half of the twentieth century, many inner city neighborhoods with majority black/African American populations fell into decline, neglect, and crime. East Russell, an inner city neighborhood in Louisville, Kentucky, was no different. It was ranked as one of the most dangerous and impoverished neighborhoods in the USA. In 1992, with no previous precedent, community leaders wanted “renewal” without population displacement. Currently, scholars question if “renewal” can happen without removal. We examine the East Russell case to better understand this possibility. Utilizing data from the Jefferson County Property Valuation Administration, the US Census Bureau, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, and a recent neighborhood charrette, we examine the conditions of the neighborhood from 1992 to 2012. We find that the efforts of the revitalization did have some successes: 575 housing units were renovated, homeownership increased, property valuations increased, crime rates declined sharply, single automobile usage fell, foreclosures were among the lowest in the city, and employment increased. While revitalization brought benefits, there are still issues that need to be addressed. Our findings contribute to the current debate that this type of place-based policy is possible without population dispersal.

KW - community development

KW - revitalization

KW - urban renewal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924801891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924801891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15575330.2015.1008533

DO - 10.1080/15575330.2015.1008533

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84924801891

VL - 46

SP - 111

EP - 132

JO - Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society

JF - Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society

SN - 1557-5330

IS - 2

ER -