Cancer risk elicitation and communication: Lessons from the psychology of risk perception

William M.P. Klein, Michael E. Stefanek

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cancer risk perceptions are a key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-167
Number of pages21
JournalCA Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007

Fingerprint

Communication
Psychology
Neoplasms
Emotions
Health Behavior
Mammography
Risk Reduction Behavior
Automatic Data Processing
Health Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Cite this

Cancer risk elicitation and communication : Lessons from the psychology of risk perception. / Klein, William M.P.; Stefanek, Michael E.

In: CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol. 57, No. 3, 01.05.2007, p. 147-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Klein, William M.P. ; Stefanek, Michael E. / Cancer risk elicitation and communication : Lessons from the psychology of risk perception. In: CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2007 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 147-167.
@article{f73f300cbc774553a94229fe90d050da,
title = "Cancer risk elicitation and communication: Lessons from the psychology of risk perception",
abstract = "Cancer risk perceptions are a key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.",
author = "Klein, {William M.P.} and Stefanek, {Michael E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "147--167",
journal = "CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians",
issn = "0007-9235",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cancer risk elicitation and communication

T2 - Lessons from the psychology of risk perception

AU - Klein, William M.P.

AU - Stefanek, Michael E.

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Cancer risk perceptions are a key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.

AB - Cancer risk perceptions are a key predictor of risk-reduction practices, health behaviors, and processing of cancer information. Nevertheless, patients and the general public (as well as health care providers) exhibit a number of errors and biases in the way they think about risk, such that their risk perceptions and decisions deviate greatly from those prescribed by normative decision models and by experts in risk assessment. For example, people are more likely to engage in screening behaviors such as mammography when faced with loss-based messages than gain-framed messages, and they often ignore the base rate of a given disease when assessing their own risk of obtaining this disease. In this article, we review many of the psychological processes that underlie risk perception and discuss how these processes lead to such deviations. Among these processes are difficulties with use of numerical information (innumeracy), cognitive processes (eg, use of time-saving heuristics), motivational factors (eg, loss and regret aversion), and emotion. We conclude with suggestions for future research in the area, as well as implications for improving the elicitation and communication of personal cancer risk.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249080108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249080108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147

DO - 10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147

M3 - Review article

C2 - 17507441

AN - SCOPUS:34249080108

VL - 57

SP - 147

EP - 167

JO - CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians

JF - CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians

SN - 0007-9235

IS - 3

ER -