Cardiac preparticipation screening for the young athlete: Why the routine use of ECG is not necessary

William O. Roberts, Chad Alan Asplund, Francis G. O'Connor, Steven D. Stovitz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The addition of an electrocardiogram (ECG) to the current United States athlete preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) as a screening tool has dominated the PPE discussion over the past decade despite the lack of demonstrable outcomes data supporting the routine use of the diagnostic study for reduction of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A good screening test should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health and the population screened must have a high prevalence of the disease to justify the screening intervention. While SCD is publicly remarkable and like any death, tragic, the prevalence of SCD in young athletes is very low and the potential for false positive results is high. While ECG screening appears to have made an impact on SCD in Italian athletes, the strategy has made no impact on Israeli athletes, and the overall impact of ECG screening on American athletes is unclear. Until outcomes studies show substantial SCD reduction benefit, the addition of routine ECG PPE screening in young athletes should not be instituted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-315
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Electrocardiology
Volume48
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Athletes
Sudden Cardiac Death
Electrocardiography
Public Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health
Population

Keywords

  • PPE
  • Preparticipation evaluation
  • Sudden cardiac death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Cardiac preparticipation screening for the young athlete : Why the routine use of ECG is not necessary. / Roberts, William O.; Asplund, Chad Alan; O'Connor, Francis G.; Stovitz, Steven D.

In: Journal of Electrocardiology, Vol. 48, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 311-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Roberts, William O. ; Asplund, Chad Alan ; O'Connor, Francis G. ; Stovitz, Steven D. / Cardiac preparticipation screening for the young athlete : Why the routine use of ECG is not necessary. In: Journal of Electrocardiology. 2015 ; Vol. 48, No. 3. pp. 311-315.
@article{c915621f948241f590987b0d923787e0,
title = "Cardiac preparticipation screening for the young athlete: Why the routine use of ECG is not necessary",
abstract = "The addition of an electrocardiogram (ECG) to the current United States athlete preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) as a screening tool has dominated the PPE discussion over the past decade despite the lack of demonstrable outcomes data supporting the routine use of the diagnostic study for reduction of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A good screening test should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health and the population screened must have a high prevalence of the disease to justify the screening intervention. While SCD is publicly remarkable and like any death, tragic, the prevalence of SCD in young athletes is very low and the potential for false positive results is high. While ECG screening appears to have made an impact on SCD in Italian athletes, the strategy has made no impact on Israeli athletes, and the overall impact of ECG screening on American athletes is unclear. Until outcomes studies show substantial SCD reduction benefit, the addition of routine ECG PPE screening in young athletes should not be instituted.",
keywords = "PPE, Preparticipation evaluation, Sudden cardiac death",
author = "Roberts, {William O.} and Asplund, {Chad Alan} and O'Connor, {Francis G.} and Stovitz, {Steven D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.01.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "311--315",
journal = "Journal of Electrocardiology",
issn = "0022-0736",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiac preparticipation screening for the young athlete

T2 - Why the routine use of ECG is not necessary

AU - Roberts, William O.

AU - Asplund, Chad Alan

AU - O'Connor, Francis G.

AU - Stovitz, Steven D.

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - The addition of an electrocardiogram (ECG) to the current United States athlete preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) as a screening tool has dominated the PPE discussion over the past decade despite the lack of demonstrable outcomes data supporting the routine use of the diagnostic study for reduction of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A good screening test should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health and the population screened must have a high prevalence of the disease to justify the screening intervention. While SCD is publicly remarkable and like any death, tragic, the prevalence of SCD in young athletes is very low and the potential for false positive results is high. While ECG screening appears to have made an impact on SCD in Italian athletes, the strategy has made no impact on Israeli athletes, and the overall impact of ECG screening on American athletes is unclear. Until outcomes studies show substantial SCD reduction benefit, the addition of routine ECG PPE screening in young athletes should not be instituted.

AB - The addition of an electrocardiogram (ECG) to the current United States athlete preparticipation physical evaluation (PPE) as a screening tool has dominated the PPE discussion over the past decade despite the lack of demonstrable outcomes data supporting the routine use of the diagnostic study for reduction of sudden cardiac death (SCD). A good screening test should influence a disease or health outcome that has a significant impact on public health and the population screened must have a high prevalence of the disease to justify the screening intervention. While SCD is publicly remarkable and like any death, tragic, the prevalence of SCD in young athletes is very low and the potential for false positive results is high. While ECG screening appears to have made an impact on SCD in Italian athletes, the strategy has made no impact on Israeli athletes, and the overall impact of ECG screening on American athletes is unclear. Until outcomes studies show substantial SCD reduction benefit, the addition of routine ECG PPE screening in young athletes should not be instituted.

KW - PPE

KW - Preparticipation evaluation

KW - Sudden cardiac death

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928825242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928825242&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.01.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.01.010

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25669141

AN - SCOPUS:84928825242

VL - 48

SP - 311

EP - 315

JO - Journal of Electrocardiology

JF - Journal of Electrocardiology

SN - 0022-0736

IS - 3

ER -