Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices of college team physicians

Chad A. Asplund, Irfan M. Asif

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:: Determine the cardiovascular screening practices of college team physicians. DESIGN:: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING:: Electronic mail with a link to a 9-item survey. PARTICIPANTS:: American Medical Society for Sports Medicine college team physicians. INTERVENTIONS:: Screening practices survey administered to college team physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices including noninvasive cardiac screening (NICS) such as electrocardiogram (ECG) or echocardiogram. RESULTS:: Two hundred twenty-four of 613 AMSSM members identifying themselves as college team physicians (36.5%) responded: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I: 146, Division II: 41, Division III: 27, National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics: 8, and Junior College: 2. The majority (78%) of schools conducted the American Heart Association (AHA) 12-element history and physical examination. Division I institutions were more likely to add an ECG and/or echocardiogram (30%) to their preparticipation examination (PPE) compared with lower divisions (P < 0.0001). Those Division I schools using NICS were more likely to do so for all athletes (P < 0.001) or revenue generating sports (P < 0.001), whereas other institutions did so only for high-risk subgroups (P < 0.01). Lower division schools would consider adding ECG if it cost less (P = 0.01) or if there were more local expertise in athlete-specific interpretation standards (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS:: Many National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes Division I programs already use NICS to screen athletes, whereas a significant portion of lower division schools add ECG for athletes deemed high risk. Increased use of these modalities suggests limitations of traditional PPE screening methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:: This is the first study to assess cardiac screening practices across all collegiate divisions and broadens our understanding of cardiac screening in high-level athletes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-279
Number of pages5
JournalClinical Journal of Sport Medicine
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Athletes
Physicians
Sports
Electrocardiography
Sports Medicine
Medical Societies
Physical Examination
Cross-Sectional Studies
History
Costs and Cost Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • electrocardiogram
  • preparticipation examination
  • screening
  • sudden cardiac death

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices of college team physicians. / Asplund, Chad A.; Asif, Irfan M.

In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.01.2014, p. 275-279.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Asplund, Chad A. ; Asif, Irfan M. / Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices of college team physicians. In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 275-279.
@article{eec2f55e7ade4a27af74c6156b229b48,
title = "Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices of college team physicians",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE:: Determine the cardiovascular screening practices of college team physicians. DESIGN:: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING:: Electronic mail with a link to a 9-item survey. PARTICIPANTS:: American Medical Society for Sports Medicine college team physicians. INTERVENTIONS:: Screening practices survey administered to college team physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices including noninvasive cardiac screening (NICS) such as electrocardiogram (ECG) or echocardiogram. RESULTS:: Two hundred twenty-four of 613 AMSSM members identifying themselves as college team physicians (36.5{\%}) responded: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I: 146, Division II: 41, Division III: 27, National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics: 8, and Junior College: 2. The majority (78{\%}) of schools conducted the American Heart Association (AHA) 12-element history and physical examination. Division I institutions were more likely to add an ECG and/or echocardiogram (30{\%}) to their preparticipation examination (PPE) compared with lower divisions (P < 0.0001). Those Division I schools using NICS were more likely to do so for all athletes (P < 0.001) or revenue generating sports (P < 0.001), whereas other institutions did so only for high-risk subgroups (P < 0.01). Lower division schools would consider adding ECG if it cost less (P = 0.01) or if there were more local expertise in athlete-specific interpretation standards (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS:: Many National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes Division I programs already use NICS to screen athletes, whereas a significant portion of lower division schools add ECG for athletes deemed high risk. Increased use of these modalities suggests limitations of traditional PPE screening methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:: This is the first study to assess cardiac screening practices across all collegiate divisions and broadens our understanding of cardiac screening in high-level athletes.",
keywords = "electrocardiogram, preparticipation examination, screening, sudden cardiac death",
author = "Asplund, {Chad A.} and Asif, {Irfan M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/JSM.0000000000000067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "275--279",
journal = "Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine",
issn = "1050-642X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices of college team physicians

AU - Asplund, Chad A.

AU - Asif, Irfan M.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE:: Determine the cardiovascular screening practices of college team physicians. DESIGN:: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING:: Electronic mail with a link to a 9-item survey. PARTICIPANTS:: American Medical Society for Sports Medicine college team physicians. INTERVENTIONS:: Screening practices survey administered to college team physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices including noninvasive cardiac screening (NICS) such as electrocardiogram (ECG) or echocardiogram. RESULTS:: Two hundred twenty-four of 613 AMSSM members identifying themselves as college team physicians (36.5%) responded: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I: 146, Division II: 41, Division III: 27, National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics: 8, and Junior College: 2. The majority (78%) of schools conducted the American Heart Association (AHA) 12-element history and physical examination. Division I institutions were more likely to add an ECG and/or echocardiogram (30%) to their preparticipation examination (PPE) compared with lower divisions (P < 0.0001). Those Division I schools using NICS were more likely to do so for all athletes (P < 0.001) or revenue generating sports (P < 0.001), whereas other institutions did so only for high-risk subgroups (P < 0.01). Lower division schools would consider adding ECG if it cost less (P = 0.01) or if there were more local expertise in athlete-specific interpretation standards (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS:: Many National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes Division I programs already use NICS to screen athletes, whereas a significant portion of lower division schools add ECG for athletes deemed high risk. Increased use of these modalities suggests limitations of traditional PPE screening methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:: This is the first study to assess cardiac screening practices across all collegiate divisions and broadens our understanding of cardiac screening in high-level athletes.

AB - OBJECTIVE:: Determine the cardiovascular screening practices of college team physicians. DESIGN:: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING:: Electronic mail with a link to a 9-item survey. PARTICIPANTS:: American Medical Society for Sports Medicine college team physicians. INTERVENTIONS:: Screening practices survey administered to college team physicians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Cardiovascular preparticipation screening practices including noninvasive cardiac screening (NICS) such as electrocardiogram (ECG) or echocardiogram. RESULTS:: Two hundred twenty-four of 613 AMSSM members identifying themselves as college team physicians (36.5%) responded: National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I: 146, Division II: 41, Division III: 27, National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics: 8, and Junior College: 2. The majority (78%) of schools conducted the American Heart Association (AHA) 12-element history and physical examination. Division I institutions were more likely to add an ECG and/or echocardiogram (30%) to their preparticipation examination (PPE) compared with lower divisions (P < 0.0001). Those Division I schools using NICS were more likely to do so for all athletes (P < 0.001) or revenue generating sports (P < 0.001), whereas other institutions did so only for high-risk subgroups (P < 0.01). Lower division schools would consider adding ECG if it cost less (P = 0.01) or if there were more local expertise in athlete-specific interpretation standards (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS:: Many National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes Division I programs already use NICS to screen athletes, whereas a significant portion of lower division schools add ECG for athletes deemed high risk. Increased use of these modalities suggests limitations of traditional PPE screening methods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE:: This is the first study to assess cardiac screening practices across all collegiate divisions and broadens our understanding of cardiac screening in high-level athletes.

KW - electrocardiogram

KW - preparticipation examination

KW - screening

KW - sudden cardiac death

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903791009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903791009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000067

DO - 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000067

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 275

EP - 279

JO - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

JF - Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine

SN - 1050-642X

IS - 4

ER -