Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Six-year results

E. J. Mertz-Fairhurst, C. D. Smith, J. E. Williams, J. D. Sherrer, J. R. Mackert, E. E. Richards, G. S. Schuster, N. L. O'Dell, K. L. Pierce, R. E. Kovarik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this clinical study was to determine the ability of an ultraconservative, sealed composite resin restoration, without a traditional cavity preparation and without the removal of the carious lesion, to arrest Class I caries. Tooth preparation was limited to placing a bevel in the enamel. These restorations were compared, over 6 years, with (1) ultraconservative, localized, sealed amalgam restorations with no extension for prevention and (2) traditional, unsealed amalgam restorations with the usual extension for prevention outline form. Caries was arrested by the ultraconservative, sealed composite resin restorations for 6 years. Complete sealant retention on the sealed amalgam restorations was somewhat lower than that on the sealed composite resin restorations; conversely partial sealant retention was higher for the sealed amalgam group. The marginal integrity of the sealed amalgam restorations was significantly superior to that of the unsealed amalgam restorations. The sealant also protected Class I posterior composite resin restorations against wear.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)827-838
Number of pages12
JournalQuintessence international
Volume23
Issue number12
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Composite Resins
Tooth Preparation
Dental Enamel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Mertz-Fairhurst, E. J., Smith, C. D., Williams, J. E., Sherrer, J. D., Mackert, J. R., Richards, E. E., ... Kovarik, R. E. (1992). Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Six-year results. Quintessence international, 23(12), 827-838.

Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations : Six-year results. / Mertz-Fairhurst, E. J.; Smith, C. D.; Williams, J. E.; Sherrer, J. D.; Mackert, J. R.; Richards, E. E.; Schuster, G. S.; O'Dell, N. L.; Pierce, K. L.; Kovarik, R. E.

In: Quintessence international, Vol. 23, No. 12, 01.01.1992, p. 827-838.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mertz-Fairhurst, EJ, Smith, CD, Williams, JE, Sherrer, JD, Mackert, JR, Richards, EE, Schuster, GS, O'Dell, NL, Pierce, KL & Kovarik, RE 1992, 'Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Six-year results', Quintessence international, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 827-838.
Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Smith CD, Williams JE, Sherrer JD, Mackert JR, Richards EE et al. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Six-year results. Quintessence international. 1992 Jan 1;23(12):827-838.
Mertz-Fairhurst, E. J. ; Smith, C. D. ; Williams, J. E. ; Sherrer, J. D. ; Mackert, J. R. ; Richards, E. E. ; Schuster, G. S. ; O'Dell, N. L. ; Pierce, K. L. ; Kovarik, R. E. / Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations : Six-year results. In: Quintessence international. 1992 ; Vol. 23, No. 12. pp. 827-838.
@article{969f58a2052e4a74b610c6e29b3848e1,
title = "Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Six-year results",
abstract = "The objective of this clinical study was to determine the ability of an ultraconservative, sealed composite resin restoration, without a traditional cavity preparation and without the removal of the carious lesion, to arrest Class I caries. Tooth preparation was limited to placing a bevel in the enamel. These restorations were compared, over 6 years, with (1) ultraconservative, localized, sealed amalgam restorations with no extension for prevention and (2) traditional, unsealed amalgam restorations with the usual extension for prevention outline form. Caries was arrested by the ultraconservative, sealed composite resin restorations for 6 years. Complete sealant retention on the sealed amalgam restorations was somewhat lower than that on the sealed composite resin restorations; conversely partial sealant retention was higher for the sealed amalgam group. The marginal integrity of the sealed amalgam restorations was significantly superior to that of the unsealed amalgam restorations. The sealant also protected Class I posterior composite resin restorations against wear.",
author = "Mertz-Fairhurst, {E. J.} and Smith, {C. D.} and Williams, {J. E.} and Sherrer, {J. D.} and Mackert, {J. R.} and Richards, {E. E.} and Schuster, {G. S.} and O'Dell, {N. L.} and Pierce, {K. L.} and Kovarik, {R. E.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "827--838",
journal = "Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)",
issn = "0033-6572",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations

T2 - Six-year results

AU - Mertz-Fairhurst, E. J.

AU - Smith, C. D.

AU - Williams, J. E.

AU - Sherrer, J. D.

AU - Mackert, J. R.

AU - Richards, E. E.

AU - Schuster, G. S.

AU - O'Dell, N. L.

AU - Pierce, K. L.

AU - Kovarik, R. E.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - The objective of this clinical study was to determine the ability of an ultraconservative, sealed composite resin restoration, without a traditional cavity preparation and without the removal of the carious lesion, to arrest Class I caries. Tooth preparation was limited to placing a bevel in the enamel. These restorations were compared, over 6 years, with (1) ultraconservative, localized, sealed amalgam restorations with no extension for prevention and (2) traditional, unsealed amalgam restorations with the usual extension for prevention outline form. Caries was arrested by the ultraconservative, sealed composite resin restorations for 6 years. Complete sealant retention on the sealed amalgam restorations was somewhat lower than that on the sealed composite resin restorations; conversely partial sealant retention was higher for the sealed amalgam group. The marginal integrity of the sealed amalgam restorations was significantly superior to that of the unsealed amalgam restorations. The sealant also protected Class I posterior composite resin restorations against wear.

AB - The objective of this clinical study was to determine the ability of an ultraconservative, sealed composite resin restoration, without a traditional cavity preparation and without the removal of the carious lesion, to arrest Class I caries. Tooth preparation was limited to placing a bevel in the enamel. These restorations were compared, over 6 years, with (1) ultraconservative, localized, sealed amalgam restorations with no extension for prevention and (2) traditional, unsealed amalgam restorations with the usual extension for prevention outline form. Caries was arrested by the ultraconservative, sealed composite resin restorations for 6 years. Complete sealant retention on the sealed amalgam restorations was somewhat lower than that on the sealed composite resin restorations; conversely partial sealant retention was higher for the sealed amalgam group. The marginal integrity of the sealed amalgam restorations was significantly superior to that of the unsealed amalgam restorations. The sealant also protected Class I posterior composite resin restorations against wear.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027027605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027027605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1305301

AN - SCOPUS:0027027605

VL - 23

SP - 827

EP - 838

JO - Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)

JF - Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)

SN - 0033-6572

IS - 12

ER -