Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) item response bias found with Mantel-Haenszel method was successfully replicated using latent variable modeling

Frances Margaret Yang, Richard N. Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study reexamines findings reported by Cole et al. of item response bias in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale by age, gender, and race. We use an item response theory-based latent variable conditioning approach. Study Design and Setting: We used the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model framework to estimate measurement bias in the CES-D responses of participants in the New Haven Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly study (N = 2,340). Results: Measurement bias attributable to race was significant for the following two CES-D items: people "are unfriendly" and "dislike me". The proportional odds of a higher-category response by blacks relative to whites on these items were 2.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65, 3.36) and 3.11 (95% CI: 2.04, 4.76), respectively. The proportional odds were higher among women (2.03 [95% CI: 1.35, 3.06]) relative to men for the CES-D item "crying.". Conclusion: Our findings confirm that three items on the CES-D show strong evidence of item response bias. The MIMIC model is preferable to the Mantel-Haenszel approach because it conditions on a latent variable, although the effect estimates can also be interpreted using a proportional odds framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1195-1200
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume60
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2007

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Studies
Depression
Confidence Intervals
Crying
Population

Keywords

  • Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D)
  • Differential item functioning (DIF)
  • Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE)
  • Item response theory (IRT)
  • Late-life depression
  • Multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) item response bias found with Mantel-Haenszel method was successfully replicated using latent variable modeling. / Yang, Frances Margaret; Jones, Richard N.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 60, No. 11, 01.11.2007, p. 1195-1200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3eed62fcc5ff4cee89ccf992539e2d86,
title = "Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) item response bias found with Mantel-Haenszel method was successfully replicated using latent variable modeling",
abstract = "Objective: This study reexamines findings reported by Cole et al. of item response bias in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale by age, gender, and race. We use an item response theory-based latent variable conditioning approach. Study Design and Setting: We used the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model framework to estimate measurement bias in the CES-D responses of participants in the New Haven Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly study (N = 2,340). Results: Measurement bias attributable to race was significant for the following two CES-D items: people {"}are unfriendly{"} and {"}dislike me{"}. The proportional odds of a higher-category response by blacks relative to whites on these items were 2.35 (95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 1.65, 3.36) and 3.11 (95{\%} CI: 2.04, 4.76), respectively. The proportional odds were higher among women (2.03 [95{\%} CI: 1.35, 3.06]) relative to men for the CES-D item {"}crying.{"}. Conclusion: Our findings confirm that three items on the CES-D show strong evidence of item response bias. The MIMIC model is preferable to the Mantel-Haenszel approach because it conditions on a latent variable, although the effect estimates can also be interpreted using a proportional odds framework.",
keywords = "Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D), Differential item functioning (DIF), Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE), Item response theory (IRT), Late-life depression, Multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model",
author = "Yang, {Frances Margaret} and Jones, {Richard N.}",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "1195--1200",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) item response bias found with Mantel-Haenszel method was successfully replicated using latent variable modeling

AU - Yang, Frances Margaret

AU - Jones, Richard N.

PY - 2007/11/1

Y1 - 2007/11/1

N2 - Objective: This study reexamines findings reported by Cole et al. of item response bias in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale by age, gender, and race. We use an item response theory-based latent variable conditioning approach. Study Design and Setting: We used the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model framework to estimate measurement bias in the CES-D responses of participants in the New Haven Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly study (N = 2,340). Results: Measurement bias attributable to race was significant for the following two CES-D items: people "are unfriendly" and "dislike me". The proportional odds of a higher-category response by blacks relative to whites on these items were 2.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65, 3.36) and 3.11 (95% CI: 2.04, 4.76), respectively. The proportional odds were higher among women (2.03 [95% CI: 1.35, 3.06]) relative to men for the CES-D item "crying.". Conclusion: Our findings confirm that three items on the CES-D show strong evidence of item response bias. The MIMIC model is preferable to the Mantel-Haenszel approach because it conditions on a latent variable, although the effect estimates can also be interpreted using a proportional odds framework.

AB - Objective: This study reexamines findings reported by Cole et al. of item response bias in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale by age, gender, and race. We use an item response theory-based latent variable conditioning approach. Study Design and Setting: We used the multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model framework to estimate measurement bias in the CES-D responses of participants in the New Haven Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly study (N = 2,340). Results: Measurement bias attributable to race was significant for the following two CES-D items: people "are unfriendly" and "dislike me". The proportional odds of a higher-category response by blacks relative to whites on these items were 2.35 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.65, 3.36) and 3.11 (95% CI: 2.04, 4.76), respectively. The proportional odds were higher among women (2.03 [95% CI: 1.35, 3.06]) relative to men for the CES-D item "crying.". Conclusion: Our findings confirm that three items on the CES-D show strong evidence of item response bias. The MIMIC model is preferable to the Mantel-Haenszel approach because it conditions on a latent variable, although the effect estimates can also be interpreted using a proportional odds framework.

KW - Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D)

KW - Differential item functioning (DIF)

KW - Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly (EPESE)

KW - Item response theory (IRT)

KW - Late-life depression

KW - Multiple indicators, multiple causes (MIMIC) model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35248897145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35248897145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 17938063

AN - SCOPUS:35248897145

VL - 60

SP - 1195

EP - 1200

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 11

ER -