Changes in sleep and wake in response to different sleeping surfaces

A pilot study

William Vaughn McCall, Niki Boggs, Alan Letton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Six married couples (12 adults, mean age 34.8 years) were randomized as couples in a cross-over design to sleep on a queen-size conventional mattress for 2 weeks and a specially-designed pressure-relief mattress for 2 weeks. The pressure-relief mattress was designed to reduce the number of contact points exceeding 30 mm Hg. Actigraphic measurements of sleep and self-reports of sleep and daytime symptoms were collected at baseline for 2 weeks on each couple's home mattress and box springs at home, followed by 2 weeks of data collection on each randomized mattress for a total of 6 weeks of data collection. Pressure maps were created for each participant on each sleeping surface. There were no significant differences between the randomized sleeping surfaces for any measure of actigraphic sleep or self-reported sleep and daytime symptoms. However, poor pressure relief performance of the home mattress was associated with better actigraphic sleep on the randomized pressure-relief mattress. We conclude that while pressure-relief mattresses may not be universally preferred, baseline characteristics of the sleeper and/or their mattress may explain performance and sleeper preferences on future mattress selection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)386-391
Number of pages6
JournalApplied Ergonomics
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sleep
Sleep
Pressure
married couple
Point contacts
performance
contact
Cross-Over Studies
Self Report

Keywords

  • Mattress
  • Pressure mapping
  • Sleep

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Changes in sleep and wake in response to different sleeping surfaces : A pilot study. / McCall, William Vaughn; Boggs, Niki; Letton, Alan.

In: Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.01.2012, p. 386-391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e68b4ae81db946c790641907b3a43d4b,
title = "Changes in sleep and wake in response to different sleeping surfaces: A pilot study",
abstract = "Six married couples (12 adults, mean age 34.8 years) were randomized as couples in a cross-over design to sleep on a queen-size conventional mattress for 2 weeks and a specially-designed pressure-relief mattress for 2 weeks. The pressure-relief mattress was designed to reduce the number of contact points exceeding 30 mm Hg. Actigraphic measurements of sleep and self-reports of sleep and daytime symptoms were collected at baseline for 2 weeks on each couple's home mattress and box springs at home, followed by 2 weeks of data collection on each randomized mattress for a total of 6 weeks of data collection. Pressure maps were created for each participant on each sleeping surface. There were no significant differences between the randomized sleeping surfaces for any measure of actigraphic sleep or self-reported sleep and daytime symptoms. However, poor pressure relief performance of the home mattress was associated with better actigraphic sleep on the randomized pressure-relief mattress. We conclude that while pressure-relief mattresses may not be universally preferred, baseline characteristics of the sleeper and/or their mattress may explain performance and sleeper preferences on future mattress selection.",
keywords = "Mattress, Pressure mapping, Sleep",
author = "McCall, {William Vaughn} and Niki Boggs and Alan Letton",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "386--391",
journal = "Applied Ergonomics",
issn = "0003-6870",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changes in sleep and wake in response to different sleeping surfaces

T2 - A pilot study

AU - McCall, William Vaughn

AU - Boggs, Niki

AU - Letton, Alan

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Six married couples (12 adults, mean age 34.8 years) were randomized as couples in a cross-over design to sleep on a queen-size conventional mattress for 2 weeks and a specially-designed pressure-relief mattress for 2 weeks. The pressure-relief mattress was designed to reduce the number of contact points exceeding 30 mm Hg. Actigraphic measurements of sleep and self-reports of sleep and daytime symptoms were collected at baseline for 2 weeks on each couple's home mattress and box springs at home, followed by 2 weeks of data collection on each randomized mattress for a total of 6 weeks of data collection. Pressure maps were created for each participant on each sleeping surface. There were no significant differences between the randomized sleeping surfaces for any measure of actigraphic sleep or self-reported sleep and daytime symptoms. However, poor pressure relief performance of the home mattress was associated with better actigraphic sleep on the randomized pressure-relief mattress. We conclude that while pressure-relief mattresses may not be universally preferred, baseline characteristics of the sleeper and/or their mattress may explain performance and sleeper preferences on future mattress selection.

AB - Six married couples (12 adults, mean age 34.8 years) were randomized as couples in a cross-over design to sleep on a queen-size conventional mattress for 2 weeks and a specially-designed pressure-relief mattress for 2 weeks. The pressure-relief mattress was designed to reduce the number of contact points exceeding 30 mm Hg. Actigraphic measurements of sleep and self-reports of sleep and daytime symptoms were collected at baseline for 2 weeks on each couple's home mattress and box springs at home, followed by 2 weeks of data collection on each randomized mattress for a total of 6 weeks of data collection. Pressure maps were created for each participant on each sleeping surface. There were no significant differences between the randomized sleeping surfaces for any measure of actigraphic sleep or self-reported sleep and daytime symptoms. However, poor pressure relief performance of the home mattress was associated with better actigraphic sleep on the randomized pressure-relief mattress. We conclude that while pressure-relief mattresses may not be universally preferred, baseline characteristics of the sleeper and/or their mattress may explain performance and sleeper preferences on future mattress selection.

KW - Mattress

KW - Pressure mapping

KW - Sleep

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054699324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054699324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.012

DO - 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.012

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 386

EP - 391

JO - Applied Ergonomics

JF - Applied Ergonomics

SN - 0003-6870

IS - 2

ER -