Children are safer in states with strict firearm laws

A National Inpatient Sample study

Arash Safavi, Peter Rhee, Viraj Pandit, Narong Kulvatunyou, Andrew Tang, Hassan Aziz, Donald Green, Terence OKeeffe, Gary Vercruysse, Randall S. Friese, Bellal Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Firearm control laws vary across the United States and remain state specific. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between variation in states' firearm control laws and the risk of firearm-related injuries in pediatric population.We hypothesized that strict firearm control laws impact the incidence of pediatric firearm injury. METHODS: All patients with trauma Ecodes and those 18 years or younger were identified from the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Individual states' firearm control laws were evaluated and scored based on background checks on firearm sales, permit requirements, assault weapon and large-capacity magazine ban, mandatory child safety lock requirements, and regulations regarding firearms in college and workplaces. States were then dichotomized into strict firearm laws (SFLs) and nonYstrict firearm laws (non-SFLs) state based on median total score. The primary outcome measurewas incidence of firearm injury. Data were compared between the two groups using simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 60,224 pediatric patients with trauma-related injuries across 44 states were included. Thirty-three states were categorized as non-SFL and 11 as SFL. Two hundred eighty-six (0.5%) had firearm injuries, of which 31 were self-inflicted. Mean firearm injury rates per 1,000 trauma patients was higher in the non-SFL states (mean [SD]: SFL, 2.2 [1.6]; non-SFL, 5.9 [5.6]; p = 0. 001). Being in a non-SFL state increased the mean firearm injury rate by 3.75 (A coefficient, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.25Y7.25; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Children living in states with strict firearm legislation are safer. Efforts to improve and standardize national firearm control laws are warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)146-151
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Firearms
Inpatients
Wounds and Injuries
Pediatrics

Keywords

  • Firearm injury
  • Firearm legislation
  • National Inpatient Sample
  • Pediatric firearm injuries
  • Strict firearm law states

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Safavi, A., Rhee, P., Pandit, V., Kulvatunyou, N., Tang, A., Aziz, H., ... Joseph, B. (2014). Children are safer in states with strict firearm laws: A National Inpatient Sample study. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 76(1), 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab10fb

Children are safer in states with strict firearm laws : A National Inpatient Sample study. / Safavi, Arash; Rhee, Peter; Pandit, Viraj; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Tang, Andrew; Aziz, Hassan; Green, Donald; OKeeffe, Terence; Vercruysse, Gary; Friese, Randall S.; Joseph, Bellal.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 76, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 146-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Safavi, A, Rhee, P, Pandit, V, Kulvatunyou, N, Tang, A, Aziz, H, Green, D, OKeeffe, T, Vercruysse, G, Friese, RS & Joseph, B 2014, 'Children are safer in states with strict firearm laws: A National Inpatient Sample study', Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab10fb
Safavi, Arash ; Rhee, Peter ; Pandit, Viraj ; Kulvatunyou, Narong ; Tang, Andrew ; Aziz, Hassan ; Green, Donald ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Vercruysse, Gary ; Friese, Randall S. ; Joseph, Bellal. / Children are safer in states with strict firearm laws : A National Inpatient Sample study. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 76, No. 1. pp. 146-151.
@article{9de579ad25904c228a5eade7d9f58e31,
title = "Children are safer in states with strict firearm laws: A National Inpatient Sample study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Firearm control laws vary across the United States and remain state specific. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between variation in states' firearm control laws and the risk of firearm-related injuries in pediatric population.We hypothesized that strict firearm control laws impact the incidence of pediatric firearm injury. METHODS: All patients with trauma Ecodes and those 18 years or younger were identified from the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Individual states' firearm control laws were evaluated and scored based on background checks on firearm sales, permit requirements, assault weapon and large-capacity magazine ban, mandatory child safety lock requirements, and regulations regarding firearms in college and workplaces. States were then dichotomized into strict firearm laws (SFLs) and nonYstrict firearm laws (non-SFLs) state based on median total score. The primary outcome measurewas incidence of firearm injury. Data were compared between the two groups using simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 60,224 pediatric patients with trauma-related injuries across 44 states were included. Thirty-three states were categorized as non-SFL and 11 as SFL. Two hundred eighty-six (0.5{\%}) had firearm injuries, of which 31 were self-inflicted. Mean firearm injury rates per 1,000 trauma patients was higher in the non-SFL states (mean [SD]: SFL, 2.2 [1.6]; non-SFL, 5.9 [5.6]; p = 0. 001). Being in a non-SFL state increased the mean firearm injury rate by 3.75 (A coefficient, 3.75; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.25Y7.25; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Children living in states with strict firearm legislation are safer. Efforts to improve and standardize national firearm control laws are warranted.",
keywords = "Firearm injury, Firearm legislation, National Inpatient Sample, Pediatric firearm injuries, Strict firearm law states",
author = "Arash Safavi and Peter Rhee and Viraj Pandit and Narong Kulvatunyou and Andrew Tang and Hassan Aziz and Donald Green and Terence OKeeffe and Gary Vercruysse and Friese, {Randall S.} and Bellal Joseph",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab10fb",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "146--151",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Children are safer in states with strict firearm laws

T2 - A National Inpatient Sample study

AU - Safavi, Arash

AU - Rhee, Peter

AU - Pandit, Viraj

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Tang, Andrew

AU - Aziz, Hassan

AU - Green, Donald

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Vercruysse, Gary

AU - Friese, Randall S.

AU - Joseph, Bellal

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Firearm control laws vary across the United States and remain state specific. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between variation in states' firearm control laws and the risk of firearm-related injuries in pediatric population.We hypothesized that strict firearm control laws impact the incidence of pediatric firearm injury. METHODS: All patients with trauma Ecodes and those 18 years or younger were identified from the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Individual states' firearm control laws were evaluated and scored based on background checks on firearm sales, permit requirements, assault weapon and large-capacity magazine ban, mandatory child safety lock requirements, and regulations regarding firearms in college and workplaces. States were then dichotomized into strict firearm laws (SFLs) and nonYstrict firearm laws (non-SFLs) state based on median total score. The primary outcome measurewas incidence of firearm injury. Data were compared between the two groups using simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 60,224 pediatric patients with trauma-related injuries across 44 states were included. Thirty-three states were categorized as non-SFL and 11 as SFL. Two hundred eighty-six (0.5%) had firearm injuries, of which 31 were self-inflicted. Mean firearm injury rates per 1,000 trauma patients was higher in the non-SFL states (mean [SD]: SFL, 2.2 [1.6]; non-SFL, 5.9 [5.6]; p = 0. 001). Being in a non-SFL state increased the mean firearm injury rate by 3.75 (A coefficient, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.25Y7.25; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Children living in states with strict firearm legislation are safer. Efforts to improve and standardize national firearm control laws are warranted.

AB - BACKGROUND: Firearm control laws vary across the United States and remain state specific. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between variation in states' firearm control laws and the risk of firearm-related injuries in pediatric population.We hypothesized that strict firearm control laws impact the incidence of pediatric firearm injury. METHODS: All patients with trauma Ecodes and those 18 years or younger were identified from the 2009 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Individual states' firearm control laws were evaluated and scored based on background checks on firearm sales, permit requirements, assault weapon and large-capacity magazine ban, mandatory child safety lock requirements, and regulations regarding firearms in college and workplaces. States were then dichotomized into strict firearm laws (SFLs) and nonYstrict firearm laws (non-SFLs) state based on median total score. The primary outcome measurewas incidence of firearm injury. Data were compared between the two groups using simple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 60,224 pediatric patients with trauma-related injuries across 44 states were included. Thirty-three states were categorized as non-SFL and 11 as SFL. Two hundred eighty-six (0.5%) had firearm injuries, of which 31 were self-inflicted. Mean firearm injury rates per 1,000 trauma patients was higher in the non-SFL states (mean [SD]: SFL, 2.2 [1.6]; non-SFL, 5.9 [5.6]; p = 0. 001). Being in a non-SFL state increased the mean firearm injury rate by 3.75 (A coefficient, 3.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.25Y7.25; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Children living in states with strict firearm legislation are safer. Efforts to improve and standardize national firearm control laws are warranted.

KW - Firearm injury

KW - Firearm legislation

KW - National Inpatient Sample

KW - Pediatric firearm injuries

KW - Strict firearm law states

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892171712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892171712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab10fb

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab10fb

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 146

EP - 151

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -