Clinical diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection

A systematic review

Mark H. Ebell, Christian Marchello, Maria Callahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Bordetella pertussis (BP) is a common cause of prolonged cough. Our objective was to perform an updated systematic review of the clinical diagnosis of BP without restriction by patient age. Methods: We identified prospective cohort studies of patients with cough or suspected pertussis and assessed study quality using QUADAS-2. We performed bivariate meta-analysis to calculate summary estimates of accuracy and created summary receiver operating characteristic curves to explore heterogeneity by vaccination status and age. Results: Of 381 studies initially identified, 22 met our inclusion criteria, of which 14 had a low risk of bias. The overall clinical impression was the most accurate predictor of BP (positive likelihood ratio [LR+], 3.3; negative likelihood ratio [LR-], 0.63). The presence of whooping cough (LR+, 2.1) and posttussive vomiting (LR+, 1.7) somewhat increased the likelihood of BP, whereas the absence of paroxysmal cough (LR-, 0.58) and the absence of sputum (LR-, 0.63) decreased it. Whooping cough and posttussive vomiting have lower sensitivity in adults. Clinical criteria defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were sensitive (0.90) but nonspecific. Typical signs and symptoms of BP may be more sensitive but less specific in vaccinated patients. Conclusions: The clinician's overall impression was the most accurate way to determine the likelihood of BP infection when a patient initially presented. Clinical decision rules that combine signs, symptoms, and point-of-care tests have not yet been developed or validated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)308-319
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bordetella Infections
Bordetella pertussis
Whooping Cough
Cough
Signs and Symptoms
Vomiting
Point-of-Care Systems
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Sputum
ROC Curve
Meta-Analysis
Vaccination
Cohort Studies
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • Bordetella pertussis
  • Vaccination
  • Vomiting
  • Whooping cough

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Clinical diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection : A systematic review. / Ebell, Mark H.; Marchello, Christian; Callahan, Maria.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.05.2017, p. 308-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ebell, Mark H. ; Marchello, Christian ; Callahan, Maria. / Clinical diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection : A systematic review. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 308-319.
@article{17642f9a27b243fe8b7bdb731f9aea2b,
title = "Clinical diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Bordetella pertussis (BP) is a common cause of prolonged cough. Our objective was to perform an updated systematic review of the clinical diagnosis of BP without restriction by patient age. Methods: We identified prospective cohort studies of patients with cough or suspected pertussis and assessed study quality using QUADAS-2. We performed bivariate meta-analysis to calculate summary estimates of accuracy and created summary receiver operating characteristic curves to explore heterogeneity by vaccination status and age. Results: Of 381 studies initially identified, 22 met our inclusion criteria, of which 14 had a low risk of bias. The overall clinical impression was the most accurate predictor of BP (positive likelihood ratio [LR+], 3.3; negative likelihood ratio [LR-], 0.63). The presence of whooping cough (LR+, 2.1) and posttussive vomiting (LR+, 1.7) somewhat increased the likelihood of BP, whereas the absence of paroxysmal cough (LR-, 0.58) and the absence of sputum (LR-, 0.63) decreased it. Whooping cough and posttussive vomiting have lower sensitivity in adults. Clinical criteria defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were sensitive (0.90) but nonspecific. Typical signs and symptoms of BP may be more sensitive but less specific in vaccinated patients. Conclusions: The clinician's overall impression was the most accurate way to determine the likelihood of BP infection when a patient initially presented. Clinical decision rules that combine signs, symptoms, and point-of-care tests have not yet been developed or validated.",
keywords = "Bordetella pertussis, Vaccination, Vomiting, Whooping cough",
author = "Ebell, {Mark H.} and Christian Marchello and Maria Callahan",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160330",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "308--319",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Ebell, Mark H.

AU - Marchello, Christian

AU - Callahan, Maria

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Background: Bordetella pertussis (BP) is a common cause of prolonged cough. Our objective was to perform an updated systematic review of the clinical diagnosis of BP without restriction by patient age. Methods: We identified prospective cohort studies of patients with cough or suspected pertussis and assessed study quality using QUADAS-2. We performed bivariate meta-analysis to calculate summary estimates of accuracy and created summary receiver operating characteristic curves to explore heterogeneity by vaccination status and age. Results: Of 381 studies initially identified, 22 met our inclusion criteria, of which 14 had a low risk of bias. The overall clinical impression was the most accurate predictor of BP (positive likelihood ratio [LR+], 3.3; negative likelihood ratio [LR-], 0.63). The presence of whooping cough (LR+, 2.1) and posttussive vomiting (LR+, 1.7) somewhat increased the likelihood of BP, whereas the absence of paroxysmal cough (LR-, 0.58) and the absence of sputum (LR-, 0.63) decreased it. Whooping cough and posttussive vomiting have lower sensitivity in adults. Clinical criteria defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were sensitive (0.90) but nonspecific. Typical signs and symptoms of BP may be more sensitive but less specific in vaccinated patients. Conclusions: The clinician's overall impression was the most accurate way to determine the likelihood of BP infection when a patient initially presented. Clinical decision rules that combine signs, symptoms, and point-of-care tests have not yet been developed or validated.

AB - Background: Bordetella pertussis (BP) is a common cause of prolonged cough. Our objective was to perform an updated systematic review of the clinical diagnosis of BP without restriction by patient age. Methods: We identified prospective cohort studies of patients with cough or suspected pertussis and assessed study quality using QUADAS-2. We performed bivariate meta-analysis to calculate summary estimates of accuracy and created summary receiver operating characteristic curves to explore heterogeneity by vaccination status and age. Results: Of 381 studies initially identified, 22 met our inclusion criteria, of which 14 had a low risk of bias. The overall clinical impression was the most accurate predictor of BP (positive likelihood ratio [LR+], 3.3; negative likelihood ratio [LR-], 0.63). The presence of whooping cough (LR+, 2.1) and posttussive vomiting (LR+, 1.7) somewhat increased the likelihood of BP, whereas the absence of paroxysmal cough (LR-, 0.58) and the absence of sputum (LR-, 0.63) decreased it. Whooping cough and posttussive vomiting have lower sensitivity in adults. Clinical criteria defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were sensitive (0.90) but nonspecific. Typical signs and symptoms of BP may be more sensitive but less specific in vaccinated patients. Conclusions: The clinician's overall impression was the most accurate way to determine the likelihood of BP infection when a patient initially presented. Clinical decision rules that combine signs, symptoms, and point-of-care tests have not yet been developed or validated.

KW - Bordetella pertussis

KW - Vaccination

KW - Vomiting

KW - Whooping cough

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019061754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019061754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160330

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2017.03.160330

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 308

EP - 319

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 3

ER -