Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in class I and II composite restorations

Daniel C.N. Chan, W. D. Browning, Kevin B Frazier, Martha G Brackett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The polymerization shrinkage of resin composites may affect restoration quality. A double blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare two curing techniques - Soft-Start (SS) and the plasma arc curing light (PAC). The hypothesis that, delaying the gel point (with SS) improves marginal seal, was tested at alpha=0.05. Also, this report includes two-week, three-month, one-year and two-year results for post-op sensitivity. Twenty informed participants, each needing two Class II and/or complex Class I restorations, gave written consent. All the teeth were trans-illuminated to rule out pre-op crack lines before restoration placement. Fifty Z100-Single Bond restorations (25/SS and 25/PAC) were placed under rubber dam. Protocols: PAC (Control) - incremental curing <2.0 mm, 2000 mW/cm2 for 10 seconds for all layers, SS (Treatment) - incremental curing <2.0 mm, 600 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds, except the final layer or enamel replacement increment, which was cured as follows - (mW/cm2/time) 200/3 seconds, wait 3 minutes; 200/3 seconds, wait 5 minutes; 600/20 seconds from multiple angles. Sensitivity to a standardized cold stimulus was performed preoperatively at 2 weeks and at 3,12 and 24 months. Patients rated their sensitivity after stimulus by means of a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, two independent, calibrated investigators evaluated the restorations clinically at each appointment. There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups at any appointment period (two-way ANOVA; p>0.05). Several conditions were defined as indicating marginal stress before the start of the trial. At 24 months, there was no significant difference between the SS and PAC groups. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, Class I and II restorations placed with a SS technique did not show significant changes in post-op sensitivity or decreased signs of marginal stress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-271
Number of pages7
JournalOperative dentistry
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2008

Fingerprint

Polymerization
Light
Rubber Dams
Composite Resins
Tooth
Randomized Controlled Trials
Gels

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in class I and II composite restorations. / Chan, Daniel C.N.; Browning, W. D.; Frazier, Kevin B; Brackett, Martha G.

In: Operative dentistry, Vol. 33, No. 3, 01.05.2008, p. 265-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6bda837706443b99735b8a3da2116fb,
title = "Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in class I and II composite restorations",
abstract = "The polymerization shrinkage of resin composites may affect restoration quality. A double blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare two curing techniques - Soft-Start (SS) and the plasma arc curing light (PAC). The hypothesis that, delaying the gel point (with SS) improves marginal seal, was tested at alpha=0.05. Also, this report includes two-week, three-month, one-year and two-year results for post-op sensitivity. Twenty informed participants, each needing two Class II and/or complex Class I restorations, gave written consent. All the teeth were trans-illuminated to rule out pre-op crack lines before restoration placement. Fifty Z100-Single Bond restorations (25/SS and 25/PAC) were placed under rubber dam. Protocols: PAC (Control) - incremental curing <2.0 mm, 2000 mW/cm2 for 10 seconds for all layers, SS (Treatment) - incremental curing <2.0 mm, 600 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds, except the final layer or enamel replacement increment, which was cured as follows - (mW/cm2/time) 200/3 seconds, wait 3 minutes; 200/3 seconds, wait 5 minutes; 600/20 seconds from multiple angles. Sensitivity to a standardized cold stimulus was performed preoperatively at 2 weeks and at 3,12 and 24 months. Patients rated their sensitivity after stimulus by means of a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, two independent, calibrated investigators evaluated the restorations clinically at each appointment. There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups at any appointment period (two-way ANOVA; p>0.05). Several conditions were defined as indicating marginal stress before the start of the trial. At 24 months, there was no significant difference between the SS and PAC groups. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, Class I and II restorations placed with a SS technique did not show significant changes in post-op sensitivity or decreased signs of marginal stress.",
author = "Chan, {Daniel C.N.} and Browning, {W. D.} and Frazier, {Kevin B} and Brackett, {Martha G}",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/07-120",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "265--271",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical evaluation of the soft-start (pulse-delay) polymerization technique in class I and II composite restorations

AU - Chan, Daniel C.N.

AU - Browning, W. D.

AU - Frazier, Kevin B

AU - Brackett, Martha G

PY - 2008/5/1

Y1 - 2008/5/1

N2 - The polymerization shrinkage of resin composites may affect restoration quality. A double blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare two curing techniques - Soft-Start (SS) and the plasma arc curing light (PAC). The hypothesis that, delaying the gel point (with SS) improves marginal seal, was tested at alpha=0.05. Also, this report includes two-week, three-month, one-year and two-year results for post-op sensitivity. Twenty informed participants, each needing two Class II and/or complex Class I restorations, gave written consent. All the teeth were trans-illuminated to rule out pre-op crack lines before restoration placement. Fifty Z100-Single Bond restorations (25/SS and 25/PAC) were placed under rubber dam. Protocols: PAC (Control) - incremental curing <2.0 mm, 2000 mW/cm2 for 10 seconds for all layers, SS (Treatment) - incremental curing <2.0 mm, 600 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds, except the final layer or enamel replacement increment, which was cured as follows - (mW/cm2/time) 200/3 seconds, wait 3 minutes; 200/3 seconds, wait 5 minutes; 600/20 seconds from multiple angles. Sensitivity to a standardized cold stimulus was performed preoperatively at 2 weeks and at 3,12 and 24 months. Patients rated their sensitivity after stimulus by means of a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, two independent, calibrated investigators evaluated the restorations clinically at each appointment. There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups at any appointment period (two-way ANOVA; p>0.05). Several conditions were defined as indicating marginal stress before the start of the trial. At 24 months, there was no significant difference between the SS and PAC groups. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, Class I and II restorations placed with a SS technique did not show significant changes in post-op sensitivity or decreased signs of marginal stress.

AB - The polymerization shrinkage of resin composites may affect restoration quality. A double blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out to compare two curing techniques - Soft-Start (SS) and the plasma arc curing light (PAC). The hypothesis that, delaying the gel point (with SS) improves marginal seal, was tested at alpha=0.05. Also, this report includes two-week, three-month, one-year and two-year results for post-op sensitivity. Twenty informed participants, each needing two Class II and/or complex Class I restorations, gave written consent. All the teeth were trans-illuminated to rule out pre-op crack lines before restoration placement. Fifty Z100-Single Bond restorations (25/SS and 25/PAC) were placed under rubber dam. Protocols: PAC (Control) - incremental curing <2.0 mm, 2000 mW/cm2 for 10 seconds for all layers, SS (Treatment) - incremental curing <2.0 mm, 600 mW/cm2 for 20 seconds, except the final layer or enamel replacement increment, which was cured as follows - (mW/cm2/time) 200/3 seconds, wait 3 minutes; 200/3 seconds, wait 5 minutes; 600/20 seconds from multiple angles. Sensitivity to a standardized cold stimulus was performed preoperatively at 2 weeks and at 3,12 and 24 months. Patients rated their sensitivity after stimulus by means of a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). In addition, two independent, calibrated investigators evaluated the restorations clinically at each appointment. There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the two groups at any appointment period (two-way ANOVA; p>0.05). Several conditions were defined as indicating marginal stress before the start of the trial. At 24 months, there was no significant difference between the SS and PAC groups. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, Class I and II restorations placed with a SS technique did not show significant changes in post-op sensitivity or decreased signs of marginal stress.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43749118956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43749118956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/07-120

DO - 10.2341/07-120

M3 - Article

C2 - 18505216

AN - SCOPUS:43749118956

VL - 33

SP - 265

EP - 271

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 3

ER -