Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care: Characteristics and quality

Maria B. Ospina, Kenneth Bond, Mohammad Karkhaneh, Nina Buscemi, Donna M. Dryden, Vernon Barnes, Linda E. Carlson, Jeffery A. Dusek, David Shannahoff-Khalsa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

83 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To provide a descriptive overview of the clinical trials assessing meditation practices for health care. Design: Systematic review of the literature. Comprehensive searches were conducted in 17 electronic bibliographic databases through September 2005. Other sources of potentially relevant studies included hand searches, reference tracking, contacting experts, and gray literature searches. Included studies were clinical trials with 10 or more adult participants using any meditation practice, providing quantitative data on health-related outcomes, and published in English. Two independent reviewers assessed study relevance, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. Results: Four hundred clinical trials on meditation (72% described as randomized) were included in the review (publication years 1956-2005). Five broad categories of meditation practices were identified: mantra meditation, mindfulness meditation, yoga, t'ai chi, and qigong. The three most studied clinical conditions were hypertension, miscellaneous cardiovascular diseases, and substance abuse. Psychosocial measures were the most frequently reported outcomes. Outcome measures of psychiatric and psychological symptoms dominate the outcomes of interest. Overall, the methodological quality of clinical trials is poor, but has significantly improved over time by 0.014 points every year (95% CI, 0.005, 0.023). Conclusions: Most clinical trials on meditation practices are generally characterized by poor methodological quality with significant threats to validity in every major quality domain assessed. Despite a statistically significant improvement in the methodological quality over time, it is imperative that future trials on meditation be rigorous in design, execution, analysis, and the reporting of results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1199-1213
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2008

Fingerprint

Meditation
Quality of Health Care
Clinical Trials
Qigong
Bibliographic Databases
Yoga
Mindfulness
Substance-Related Disorders
Psychiatry
Publications
Meta-Analysis
Cardiovascular Diseases
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Psychology
Hypertension
Delivery of Health Care
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Complementary and alternative medicine

Cite this

Ospina, M. B., Bond, K., Karkhaneh, M., Buscemi, N., Dryden, D. M., Barnes, V., ... Shannahoff-Khalsa, D. (2008). Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care: Characteristics and quality. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 14(10), 1199-1213. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2008.0307

Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care : Characteristics and quality. / Ospina, Maria B.; Bond, Kenneth; Karkhaneh, Mohammad; Buscemi, Nina; Dryden, Donna M.; Barnes, Vernon; Carlson, Linda E.; Dusek, Jeffery A.; Shannahoff-Khalsa, David.

In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 10, 01.12.2008, p. 1199-1213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ospina, MB, Bond, K, Karkhaneh, M, Buscemi, N, Dryden, DM, Barnes, V, Carlson, LE, Dusek, JA & Shannahoff-Khalsa, D 2008, 'Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care: Characteristics and quality', Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1199-1213. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2008.0307
Ospina, Maria B. ; Bond, Kenneth ; Karkhaneh, Mohammad ; Buscemi, Nina ; Dryden, Donna M. ; Barnes, Vernon ; Carlson, Linda E. ; Dusek, Jeffery A. ; Shannahoff-Khalsa, David. / Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care : Characteristics and quality. In: Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 14, No. 10. pp. 1199-1213.
@article{5b8174ed4d2641bd989ab419bd9335c2,
title = "Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care: Characteristics and quality",
abstract = "Objective: To provide a descriptive overview of the clinical trials assessing meditation practices for health care. Design: Systematic review of the literature. Comprehensive searches were conducted in 17 electronic bibliographic databases through September 2005. Other sources of potentially relevant studies included hand searches, reference tracking, contacting experts, and gray literature searches. Included studies were clinical trials with 10 or more adult participants using any meditation practice, providing quantitative data on health-related outcomes, and published in English. Two independent reviewers assessed study relevance, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. Results: Four hundred clinical trials on meditation (72{\%} described as randomized) were included in the review (publication years 1956-2005). Five broad categories of meditation practices were identified: mantra meditation, mindfulness meditation, yoga, t'ai chi, and qigong. The three most studied clinical conditions were hypertension, miscellaneous cardiovascular diseases, and substance abuse. Psychosocial measures were the most frequently reported outcomes. Outcome measures of psychiatric and psychological symptoms dominate the outcomes of interest. Overall, the methodological quality of clinical trials is poor, but has significantly improved over time by 0.014 points every year (95{\%} CI, 0.005, 0.023). Conclusions: Most clinical trials on meditation practices are generally characterized by poor methodological quality with significant threats to validity in every major quality domain assessed. Despite a statistically significant improvement in the methodological quality over time, it is imperative that future trials on meditation be rigorous in design, execution, analysis, and the reporting of results.",
author = "Ospina, {Maria B.} and Kenneth Bond and Mohammad Karkhaneh and Nina Buscemi and Dryden, {Donna M.} and Vernon Barnes and Carlson, {Linda E.} and Dusek, {Jeffery A.} and David Shannahoff-Khalsa",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/acm.2008.0307",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "1199--1213",
journal = "Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine",
issn = "1075-5535",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical trials of meditation practices in health care

T2 - Characteristics and quality

AU - Ospina, Maria B.

AU - Bond, Kenneth

AU - Karkhaneh, Mohammad

AU - Buscemi, Nina

AU - Dryden, Donna M.

AU - Barnes, Vernon

AU - Carlson, Linda E.

AU - Dusek, Jeffery A.

AU - Shannahoff-Khalsa, David

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - Objective: To provide a descriptive overview of the clinical trials assessing meditation practices for health care. Design: Systematic review of the literature. Comprehensive searches were conducted in 17 electronic bibliographic databases through September 2005. Other sources of potentially relevant studies included hand searches, reference tracking, contacting experts, and gray literature searches. Included studies were clinical trials with 10 or more adult participants using any meditation practice, providing quantitative data on health-related outcomes, and published in English. Two independent reviewers assessed study relevance, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. Results: Four hundred clinical trials on meditation (72% described as randomized) were included in the review (publication years 1956-2005). Five broad categories of meditation practices were identified: mantra meditation, mindfulness meditation, yoga, t'ai chi, and qigong. The three most studied clinical conditions were hypertension, miscellaneous cardiovascular diseases, and substance abuse. Psychosocial measures were the most frequently reported outcomes. Outcome measures of psychiatric and psychological symptoms dominate the outcomes of interest. Overall, the methodological quality of clinical trials is poor, but has significantly improved over time by 0.014 points every year (95% CI, 0.005, 0.023). Conclusions: Most clinical trials on meditation practices are generally characterized by poor methodological quality with significant threats to validity in every major quality domain assessed. Despite a statistically significant improvement in the methodological quality over time, it is imperative that future trials on meditation be rigorous in design, execution, analysis, and the reporting of results.

AB - Objective: To provide a descriptive overview of the clinical trials assessing meditation practices for health care. Design: Systematic review of the literature. Comprehensive searches were conducted in 17 electronic bibliographic databases through September 2005. Other sources of potentially relevant studies included hand searches, reference tracking, contacting experts, and gray literature searches. Included studies were clinical trials with 10 or more adult participants using any meditation practice, providing quantitative data on health-related outcomes, and published in English. Two independent reviewers assessed study relevance, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the studies. Results: Four hundred clinical trials on meditation (72% described as randomized) were included in the review (publication years 1956-2005). Five broad categories of meditation practices were identified: mantra meditation, mindfulness meditation, yoga, t'ai chi, and qigong. The three most studied clinical conditions were hypertension, miscellaneous cardiovascular diseases, and substance abuse. Psychosocial measures were the most frequently reported outcomes. Outcome measures of psychiatric and psychological symptoms dominate the outcomes of interest. Overall, the methodological quality of clinical trials is poor, but has significantly improved over time by 0.014 points every year (95% CI, 0.005, 0.023). Conclusions: Most clinical trials on meditation practices are generally characterized by poor methodological quality with significant threats to validity in every major quality domain assessed. Despite a statistically significant improvement in the methodological quality over time, it is imperative that future trials on meditation be rigorous in design, execution, analysis, and the reporting of results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149239927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149239927&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/acm.2008.0307

DO - 10.1089/acm.2008.0307

M3 - Article

C2 - 19123875

AN - SCOPUS:58149239927

VL - 14

SP - 1199

EP - 1213

JO - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

JF - Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine

SN - 1075-5535

IS - 10

ER -