Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images

Daron Gale Ferris, Mark S. Litaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was undertaken to estimate the accuracy of colposcopy quality control review of subjects' digitized colposcopic images during the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study (ALTS). After colposcopic examination and the acquisition of 2 digitized cervical images, colposcopists recorded colposcopic diagnoses in a standardized computer database. The images were transferred by modem to colposcopy quality control reviewers for a blinded interpretation, including assessment of image quality. Reviewers' and colposcopists' diagnoses were compared with histologic diagnoses using standard contingency table methods. Colposcopists and reviewers underdiagnosed 16.1% and 25.3% of subjects, and overdiagnosed 44.7% and 19.8% of subjects compared with histology, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater were 35.4% versus 23.2%, P <. 0001, and 89.9% versus 95.0%, P <. 0001, respectively, for colposcopists and reviewers. Colposcopy quality control by review of digitized colposcopic images in clinical trials warrants further evaluation if the accuracy can be improved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1934-1941
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume191
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Colposcopy
Quality Control
Modems
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Triage
Histology
Clinical Trials
Databases
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • ATLS trial
  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • Colposcopy
  • Quality control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images. / Ferris, Daron Gale; Litaker, Mark S.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 191, No. 6, 01.01.2004, p. 1934-1941.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1a9132d524b4b1fb5c57f6abd10d1f1,
title = "Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images",
abstract = "This study was undertaken to estimate the accuracy of colposcopy quality control review of subjects' digitized colposcopic images during the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study (ALTS). After colposcopic examination and the acquisition of 2 digitized cervical images, colposcopists recorded colposcopic diagnoses in a standardized computer database. The images were transferred by modem to colposcopy quality control reviewers for a blinded interpretation, including assessment of image quality. Reviewers' and colposcopists' diagnoses were compared with histologic diagnoses using standard contingency table methods. Colposcopists and reviewers underdiagnosed 16.1{\%} and 25.3{\%} of subjects, and overdiagnosed 44.7{\%} and 19.8{\%} of subjects compared with histology, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater were 35.4{\%} versus 23.2{\%}, P <. 0001, and 89.9{\%} versus 95.0{\%}, P <. 0001, respectively, for colposcopists and reviewers. Colposcopy quality control by review of digitized colposcopic images in clinical trials warrants further evaluation if the accuracy can be improved.",
keywords = "ATLS trial, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Colposcopy, Quality control",
author = "Ferris, {Daron Gale} and Litaker, {Mark S.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.107",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "1934--1941",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Colposcopy quality control by remote review of digitized colposcopic images

AU - Ferris, Daron Gale

AU - Litaker, Mark S.

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - This study was undertaken to estimate the accuracy of colposcopy quality control review of subjects' digitized colposcopic images during the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study (ALTS). After colposcopic examination and the acquisition of 2 digitized cervical images, colposcopists recorded colposcopic diagnoses in a standardized computer database. The images were transferred by modem to colposcopy quality control reviewers for a blinded interpretation, including assessment of image quality. Reviewers' and colposcopists' diagnoses were compared with histologic diagnoses using standard contingency table methods. Colposcopists and reviewers underdiagnosed 16.1% and 25.3% of subjects, and overdiagnosed 44.7% and 19.8% of subjects compared with histology, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater were 35.4% versus 23.2%, P <. 0001, and 89.9% versus 95.0%, P <. 0001, respectively, for colposcopists and reviewers. Colposcopy quality control by review of digitized colposcopic images in clinical trials warrants further evaluation if the accuracy can be improved.

AB - This study was undertaken to estimate the accuracy of colposcopy quality control review of subjects' digitized colposcopic images during the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion triage study (ALTS). After colposcopic examination and the acquisition of 2 digitized cervical images, colposcopists recorded colposcopic diagnoses in a standardized computer database. The images were transferred by modem to colposcopy quality control reviewers for a blinded interpretation, including assessment of image quality. Reviewers' and colposcopists' diagnoses were compared with histologic diagnoses using standard contingency table methods. Colposcopists and reviewers underdiagnosed 16.1% and 25.3% of subjects, and overdiagnosed 44.7% and 19.8% of subjects compared with histology, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or greater were 35.4% versus 23.2%, P <. 0001, and 89.9% versus 95.0%, P <. 0001, respectively, for colposcopists and reviewers. Colposcopy quality control by review of digitized colposcopic images in clinical trials warrants further evaluation if the accuracy can be improved.

KW - ATLS trial

KW - Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

KW - Colposcopy

KW - Quality control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10044270713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10044270713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.107

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.107

M3 - Article

VL - 191

SP - 1934

EP - 1941

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 6

ER -