Comparative Study of the Variability of 0.06 Tapered Rotary Endodontic Files to Current Taper Standards

Garth W. Hatch, Steven Roberts, Anthony P. Joyce, Royce Runner, James C. McPherson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the taper variation among Profile, Guidance, and EndoSequence 0.06 tapered rotary files to current standards. Fifteen files of sizes 35, 40, and 45 from each manufacturer were evaluated for a total of 135 files. A digital image of the first 4 mm of each file was captured with light microscope at 22×, calibrated for 0.001-mm accuracy, and analyzed. The diameter of each file was measured at 1 and 4 mm, and the taper was calculated. Of the 3 file systems, 100% of the Profile files, 97.8% of the Guidance files, and 86.7% of the EndoSequence files fell within ±0.02 taper. All file systems demonstrated variability within their groups. A series of χ2 analyses indicated that manufacturers tend to produce Guidance and Profile tapers slightly under the ideal 0.06 taper (P < .05). The tapers of EndoSequence files were just as likely to be over or under the advertised 0.06 taper (P > .05).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-465
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008

Fingerprint

Endodontics
Light

Keywords

  • NiTi rotary files
  • taper
  • variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Comparative Study of the Variability of 0.06 Tapered Rotary Endodontic Files to Current Taper Standards. / Hatch, Garth W.; Roberts, Steven; Joyce, Anthony P.; Runner, Royce; McPherson, James C.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.04.2008, p. 463-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hatch, Garth W. ; Roberts, Steven ; Joyce, Anthony P. ; Runner, Royce ; McPherson, James C. / Comparative Study of the Variability of 0.06 Tapered Rotary Endodontic Files to Current Taper Standards. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2008 ; Vol. 34, No. 4. pp. 463-465.
@article{0d831fda83944075b9ce599dbb09586f,
title = "Comparative Study of the Variability of 0.06 Tapered Rotary Endodontic Files to Current Taper Standards",
abstract = "This study compared the taper variation among Profile, Guidance, and EndoSequence 0.06 tapered rotary files to current standards. Fifteen files of sizes 35, 40, and 45 from each manufacturer were evaluated for a total of 135 files. A digital image of the first 4 mm of each file was captured with light microscope at 22×, calibrated for 0.001-mm accuracy, and analyzed. The diameter of each file was measured at 1 and 4 mm, and the taper was calculated. Of the 3 file systems, 100{\%} of the Profile files, 97.8{\%} of the Guidance files, and 86.7{\%} of the EndoSequence files fell within ±0.02 taper. All file systems demonstrated variability within their groups. A series of χ2 analyses indicated that manufacturers tend to produce Guidance and Profile tapers slightly under the ideal 0.06 taper (P < .05). The tapers of EndoSequence files were just as likely to be over or under the advertised 0.06 taper (P > .05).",
keywords = "NiTi rotary files, taper, variability",
author = "Hatch, {Garth W.} and Steven Roberts and Joyce, {Anthony P.} and Royce Runner and McPherson, {James C.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "463--465",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative Study of the Variability of 0.06 Tapered Rotary Endodontic Files to Current Taper Standards

AU - Hatch, Garth W.

AU - Roberts, Steven

AU - Joyce, Anthony P.

AU - Runner, Royce

AU - McPherson, James C.

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - This study compared the taper variation among Profile, Guidance, and EndoSequence 0.06 tapered rotary files to current standards. Fifteen files of sizes 35, 40, and 45 from each manufacturer were evaluated for a total of 135 files. A digital image of the first 4 mm of each file was captured with light microscope at 22×, calibrated for 0.001-mm accuracy, and analyzed. The diameter of each file was measured at 1 and 4 mm, and the taper was calculated. Of the 3 file systems, 100% of the Profile files, 97.8% of the Guidance files, and 86.7% of the EndoSequence files fell within ±0.02 taper. All file systems demonstrated variability within their groups. A series of χ2 analyses indicated that manufacturers tend to produce Guidance and Profile tapers slightly under the ideal 0.06 taper (P < .05). The tapers of EndoSequence files were just as likely to be over or under the advertised 0.06 taper (P > .05).

AB - This study compared the taper variation among Profile, Guidance, and EndoSequence 0.06 tapered rotary files to current standards. Fifteen files of sizes 35, 40, and 45 from each manufacturer were evaluated for a total of 135 files. A digital image of the first 4 mm of each file was captured with light microscope at 22×, calibrated for 0.001-mm accuracy, and analyzed. The diameter of each file was measured at 1 and 4 mm, and the taper was calculated. Of the 3 file systems, 100% of the Profile files, 97.8% of the Guidance files, and 86.7% of the EndoSequence files fell within ±0.02 taper. All file systems demonstrated variability within their groups. A series of χ2 analyses indicated that manufacturers tend to produce Guidance and Profile tapers slightly under the ideal 0.06 taper (P < .05). The tapers of EndoSequence files were just as likely to be over or under the advertised 0.06 taper (P > .05).

KW - NiTi rotary files

KW - taper

KW - variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40849114526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40849114526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.003

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 18358898

AN - SCOPUS:40849114526

VL - 34

SP - 463

EP - 465

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 4

ER -