Comparing the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in the assessment of wrist flexor spasticity in patients with stroke: Protocol for a neurophysiological study

Hamid Abolhasani, Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari, Soofia Naghdi, Korosh Mansouri, Nastaran Ghotbi, Scott Hasson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Reliable and valid tools must be used to assess spasticity in clinical practise and research settings. There is a paucity of literature regarding the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS). No study, to date, has been performed to compare the validity of the MMAS and the MTS. This neurophysiological study protocol will compare the validity of the MMAS and the MTS in the assessment of poststroke wrist flexor spasticity. Methods and analysis: Thirty-two patients with stroke from the University Rehabilitation clinics will be recruited to participate in this cross-sectional, noninterventional study. All measurements will be taken in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department of Shafa University Hospital in Tehran, Iran. First, wrist flexor spasticity will be assessed clinically using the MMAS and MTS. The tests will be applied randomly. For the MTS, the components of R1, R2, R2-R1 and quality of muscle reaction will be measured. Second, neurophysiological measures of H-reflex latency, H max/ Mmax ratio, Hslp and Hslp/ Mslp ratio will be collected from the affected side. The results will be analysed using Spearman's ? test or Pearson's correlation test to determine the validity of the MMAS and the MTS as well as to compare the validity between the MMAS and the MTS. Ethics and dissemination: The Research Council, School of Rehabilitation and the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) approved the study protocol. The study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at international congresses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere001394
JournalBMJ Open
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Wrist
Stroke
H-Reflex
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Ethics Committees
Iran
Research
Ethics
Publications
Rehabilitation
Cross-Sectional Studies
Muscles
Stroke Rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparing the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in the assessment of wrist flexor spasticity in patients with stroke : Protocol for a neurophysiological study. / Abolhasani, Hamid; Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin; Naghdi, Soofia; Mansouri, Korosh; Ghotbi, Nastaran; Hasson, Scott.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 2, No. 6, e001394, 01.12.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abolhasani, Hamid ; Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin ; Naghdi, Soofia ; Mansouri, Korosh ; Ghotbi, Nastaran ; Hasson, Scott. / Comparing the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in the assessment of wrist flexor spasticity in patients with stroke : Protocol for a neurophysiological study. In: BMJ Open. 2012 ; Vol. 2, No. 6.
@article{cf8dc82646794c65bd14ab1451d417b7,
title = "Comparing the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in the assessment of wrist flexor spasticity in patients with stroke: Protocol for a neurophysiological study",
abstract = "Introduction: Reliable and valid tools must be used to assess spasticity in clinical practise and research settings. There is a paucity of literature regarding the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS). No study, to date, has been performed to compare the validity of the MMAS and the MTS. This neurophysiological study protocol will compare the validity of the MMAS and the MTS in the assessment of poststroke wrist flexor spasticity. Methods and analysis: Thirty-two patients with stroke from the University Rehabilitation clinics will be recruited to participate in this cross-sectional, noninterventional study. All measurements will be taken in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department of Shafa University Hospital in Tehran, Iran. First, wrist flexor spasticity will be assessed clinically using the MMAS and MTS. The tests will be applied randomly. For the MTS, the components of R1, R2, R2-R1 and quality of muscle reaction will be measured. Second, neurophysiological measures of H-reflex latency, H max/ Mmax ratio, Hslp and Hslp/ Mslp ratio will be collected from the affected side. The results will be analysed using Spearman's ? test or Pearson's correlation test to determine the validity of the MMAS and the MTS as well as to compare the validity between the MMAS and the MTS. Ethics and dissemination: The Research Council, School of Rehabilitation and the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) approved the study protocol. The study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at international congresses.",
author = "Hamid Abolhasani and Ansari, {Noureddin Nakhostin} and Soofia Naghdi and Korosh Mansouri and Nastaran Ghotbi and Scott Hasson",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001394",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS) in the assessment of wrist flexor spasticity in patients with stroke

T2 - Protocol for a neurophysiological study

AU - Abolhasani, Hamid

AU - Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin

AU - Naghdi, Soofia

AU - Mansouri, Korosh

AU - Ghotbi, Nastaran

AU - Hasson, Scott

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Introduction: Reliable and valid tools must be used to assess spasticity in clinical practise and research settings. There is a paucity of literature regarding the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS). No study, to date, has been performed to compare the validity of the MMAS and the MTS. This neurophysiological study protocol will compare the validity of the MMAS and the MTS in the assessment of poststroke wrist flexor spasticity. Methods and analysis: Thirty-two patients with stroke from the University Rehabilitation clinics will be recruited to participate in this cross-sectional, noninterventional study. All measurements will be taken in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department of Shafa University Hospital in Tehran, Iran. First, wrist flexor spasticity will be assessed clinically using the MMAS and MTS. The tests will be applied randomly. For the MTS, the components of R1, R2, R2-R1 and quality of muscle reaction will be measured. Second, neurophysiological measures of H-reflex latency, H max/ Mmax ratio, Hslp and Hslp/ Mslp ratio will be collected from the affected side. The results will be analysed using Spearman's ? test or Pearson's correlation test to determine the validity of the MMAS and the MTS as well as to compare the validity between the MMAS and the MTS. Ethics and dissemination: The Research Council, School of Rehabilitation and the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) approved the study protocol. The study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at international congresses.

AB - Introduction: Reliable and valid tools must be used to assess spasticity in clinical practise and research settings. There is a paucity of literature regarding the validity of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) and the Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS). No study, to date, has been performed to compare the validity of the MMAS and the MTS. This neurophysiological study protocol will compare the validity of the MMAS and the MTS in the assessment of poststroke wrist flexor spasticity. Methods and analysis: Thirty-two patients with stroke from the University Rehabilitation clinics will be recruited to participate in this cross-sectional, noninterventional study. All measurements will be taken in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department of Shafa University Hospital in Tehran, Iran. First, wrist flexor spasticity will be assessed clinically using the MMAS and MTS. The tests will be applied randomly. For the MTS, the components of R1, R2, R2-R1 and quality of muscle reaction will be measured. Second, neurophysiological measures of H-reflex latency, H max/ Mmax ratio, Hslp and Hslp/ Mslp ratio will be collected from the affected side. The results will be analysed using Spearman's ? test or Pearson's correlation test to determine the validity of the MMAS and the MTS as well as to compare the validity between the MMAS and the MTS. Ethics and dissemination: The Research Council, School of Rehabilitation and the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) approved the study protocol. The study results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications and presented at international congresses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873802154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873802154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001394

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001394

M3 - Article

C2 - 23166123

AN - SCOPUS:84873802154

VL - 2

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 6

M1 - e001394

ER -