Comparison of 2 Systems for Clinical Practice Profiling in Diabetic Care

Medical Records Versus Claims and Administrative Data

J. Ross Maclean, Donna M. Fick, Wayne K. Hoffman, Coleman T. King, Eric R. Lough, Jennifer L Waller

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To (1) describe the rate of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA 1c) testing and control in a primary care clinic at an academic medical center; (2) compare academic medical center and health maintenance organization (HMO) data for a subgroup of the same patients; and (3) discuss the challenges to accurate clinical practice profiling. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of medical records and claims and administrative data. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 300 patients with diabetes mellitus from the Primary Care practice at an academic medical center (AMC). The HMO and AMC were in the southeastern United States. The study adhered to the National Committee for Quality Assurance's Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set 3.0 (1998) guidelines for collection of the numerator and denominator data. Results: Overall, 275 (91.7%) of 300 patients underwent a documented HbA1c test (range, 77.8%-98.0% across the 5 Primary Care Associates clinic physicians). Of these 275 patients, 206 (74.9%; range, 52.4%-84.7%) were under "good control" (defined by the National Committee for Quality Assurance as an HbA1c level of ≤9.5%). The mean (SD) HbA1c level was 8.45% (1.98%). Data from the HMO documented a rate of HbA1c testing of 36.3% (45/124) compared with 92.7% (115/124) based on case note review at the academic medical center. Conclusions: Current administrative and claims-based information systems have inherent weaknesses if used for performance measurement. Reliance solely on medical record review is time and cost prohibitive. To ensure complete reporting of mandated "quality measures" will necessitate the tracking of data across different healthcare systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-179
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2002

Fingerprint

Medical Records
Health Maintenance Organizations
Primary Health Care
Southeastern United States
Glycosylated Hemoglobin A
Information Systems
Diabetes Mellitus
Retrospective Studies
Guidelines
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Comparison of 2 Systems for Clinical Practice Profiling in Diabetic Care : Medical Records Versus Claims and Administrative Data. / Maclean, J. Ross; Fick, Donna M.; Hoffman, Wayne K.; King, Coleman T.; Lough, Eric R.; Waller, Jennifer L.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.02.2002, p. 175-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Maclean, J. Ross ; Fick, Donna M. ; Hoffman, Wayne K. ; King, Coleman T. ; Lough, Eric R. ; Waller, Jennifer L. / Comparison of 2 Systems for Clinical Practice Profiling in Diabetic Care : Medical Records Versus Claims and Administrative Data. In: American Journal of Managed Care. 2002 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 175-179.
@article{aa1a5494849d41b7a619c3cf7b0b3855,
title = "Comparison of 2 Systems for Clinical Practice Profiling in Diabetic Care: Medical Records Versus Claims and Administrative Data",
abstract = "Objectives: To (1) describe the rate of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA 1c) testing and control in a primary care clinic at an academic medical center; (2) compare academic medical center and health maintenance organization (HMO) data for a subgroup of the same patients; and (3) discuss the challenges to accurate clinical practice profiling. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of medical records and claims and administrative data. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 300 patients with diabetes mellitus from the Primary Care practice at an academic medical center (AMC). The HMO and AMC were in the southeastern United States. The study adhered to the National Committee for Quality Assurance's Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set 3.0 (1998) guidelines for collection of the numerator and denominator data. Results: Overall, 275 (91.7{\%}) of 300 patients underwent a documented HbA1c test (range, 77.8{\%}-98.0{\%} across the 5 Primary Care Associates clinic physicians). Of these 275 patients, 206 (74.9{\%}; range, 52.4{\%}-84.7{\%}) were under {"}good control{"} (defined by the National Committee for Quality Assurance as an HbA1c level of ≤9.5{\%}). The mean (SD) HbA1c level was 8.45{\%} (1.98{\%}). Data from the HMO documented a rate of HbA1c testing of 36.3{\%} (45/124) compared with 92.7{\%} (115/124) based on case note review at the academic medical center. Conclusions: Current administrative and claims-based information systems have inherent weaknesses if used for performance measurement. Reliance solely on medical record review is time and cost prohibitive. To ensure complete reporting of mandated {"}quality measures{"} will necessitate the tracking of data across different healthcare systems.",
author = "Maclean, {J. Ross} and Fick, {Donna M.} and Hoffman, {Wayne K.} and King, {Coleman T.} and Lough, {Eric R.} and Waller, {Jennifer L}",
year = "2002",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "175--179",
journal = "The American journal of managed care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2 Systems for Clinical Practice Profiling in Diabetic Care

T2 - Medical Records Versus Claims and Administrative Data

AU - Maclean, J. Ross

AU - Fick, Donna M.

AU - Hoffman, Wayne K.

AU - King, Coleman T.

AU - Lough, Eric R.

AU - Waller, Jennifer L

PY - 2002/2/1

Y1 - 2002/2/1

N2 - Objectives: To (1) describe the rate of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA 1c) testing and control in a primary care clinic at an academic medical center; (2) compare academic medical center and health maintenance organization (HMO) data for a subgroup of the same patients; and (3) discuss the challenges to accurate clinical practice profiling. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of medical records and claims and administrative data. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 300 patients with diabetes mellitus from the Primary Care practice at an academic medical center (AMC). The HMO and AMC were in the southeastern United States. The study adhered to the National Committee for Quality Assurance's Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set 3.0 (1998) guidelines for collection of the numerator and denominator data. Results: Overall, 275 (91.7%) of 300 patients underwent a documented HbA1c test (range, 77.8%-98.0% across the 5 Primary Care Associates clinic physicians). Of these 275 patients, 206 (74.9%; range, 52.4%-84.7%) were under "good control" (defined by the National Committee for Quality Assurance as an HbA1c level of ≤9.5%). The mean (SD) HbA1c level was 8.45% (1.98%). Data from the HMO documented a rate of HbA1c testing of 36.3% (45/124) compared with 92.7% (115/124) based on case note review at the academic medical center. Conclusions: Current administrative and claims-based information systems have inherent weaknesses if used for performance measurement. Reliance solely on medical record review is time and cost prohibitive. To ensure complete reporting of mandated "quality measures" will necessitate the tracking of data across different healthcare systems.

AB - Objectives: To (1) describe the rate of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA 1c) testing and control in a primary care clinic at an academic medical center; (2) compare academic medical center and health maintenance organization (HMO) data for a subgroup of the same patients; and (3) discuss the challenges to accurate clinical practice profiling. Study Design: Retrospective analysis of medical records and claims and administrative data. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 300 patients with diabetes mellitus from the Primary Care practice at an academic medical center (AMC). The HMO and AMC were in the southeastern United States. The study adhered to the National Committee for Quality Assurance's Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set 3.0 (1998) guidelines for collection of the numerator and denominator data. Results: Overall, 275 (91.7%) of 300 patients underwent a documented HbA1c test (range, 77.8%-98.0% across the 5 Primary Care Associates clinic physicians). Of these 275 patients, 206 (74.9%; range, 52.4%-84.7%) were under "good control" (defined by the National Committee for Quality Assurance as an HbA1c level of ≤9.5%). The mean (SD) HbA1c level was 8.45% (1.98%). Data from the HMO documented a rate of HbA1c testing of 36.3% (45/124) compared with 92.7% (115/124) based on case note review at the academic medical center. Conclusions: Current administrative and claims-based information systems have inherent weaknesses if used for performance measurement. Reliance solely on medical record review is time and cost prohibitive. To ensure complete reporting of mandated "quality measures" will necessitate the tracking of data across different healthcare systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036480771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036480771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 8

SP - 175

EP - 179

JO - The American journal of managed care

JF - The American journal of managed care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 2

ER -