Comparison of 3D reconstructive technologies used for morphometric research and the translation of knowledge using a decision matrix

Charys M. Martin, Victoria A. Roach, Ngan Nguyen, Charles L. Rice, Timothy D. Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of three-dimensional (3D) models for education, pre-operative assessment, presurgical planning, and measurement have become more prevalent. With the increase in prevalence of 3D models there has also been an increase in 3D reconstructive software programs that are used to create these models. These software programs differ in reconstruction concepts, operating system requirements, user features, cost, and no one program has emerged as the standard. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic comparison of three widely available 3D reconstructive software programs, Amira®, OsiriX, and Mimics®, with respect to the software's ability to be used in two broad themes: morphometric research and education to translate morphological knowledge. Cost, system requirements, and inherent features of each program were compared. A novel concept selection tool, a decision matrix, was used to objectify comparisons of usability of the interface, quality of the output, and efficiency of the tools. Findings indicate that Mimics was the best-suited program for construction of 3D anatomical models and morphometric analysis, but for creating a learning tool the results were less clear. OsiriX was very user-friendly; however, it had limited capabilities. Conversely, although Amira had endless potential and could create complex dynamic videos, it had a challenging interface. These results provide a resource for morphometric researchers and educators to assist the selection of appropriate reconstruction programs when starting a new 3D modeling project.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)393-403
Number of pages11
JournalAnatomical Sciences Education
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Translational Medical Research
Software
Technology
Research
Anatomic Models
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Aptitude
Research Personnel
Learning
Efficiency

Keywords

  • Anatomy education
  • Anatomy research
  • Decision matrix
  • Digital anatomy
  • Image segmentation
  • Medical education
  • Morphometric research
  • Reconstructive technologies
  • Three-dimensional modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology
  • Embryology

Cite this

Comparison of 3D reconstructive technologies used for morphometric research and the translation of knowledge using a decision matrix. / Martin, Charys M.; Roach, Victoria A.; Nguyen, Ngan; Rice, Charles L.; Wilson, Timothy D.

In: Anatomical Sciences Education, Vol. 6, No. 6, 01.01.2013, p. 393-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martin, Charys M. ; Roach, Victoria A. ; Nguyen, Ngan ; Rice, Charles L. ; Wilson, Timothy D. / Comparison of 3D reconstructive technologies used for morphometric research and the translation of knowledge using a decision matrix. In: Anatomical Sciences Education. 2013 ; Vol. 6, No. 6. pp. 393-403.
@article{7d4e05f52faa4cbcb2eaca76acdd66ee,
title = "Comparison of 3D reconstructive technologies used for morphometric research and the translation of knowledge using a decision matrix",
abstract = "The use of three-dimensional (3D) models for education, pre-operative assessment, presurgical planning, and measurement have become more prevalent. With the increase in prevalence of 3D models there has also been an increase in 3D reconstructive software programs that are used to create these models. These software programs differ in reconstruction concepts, operating system requirements, user features, cost, and no one program has emerged as the standard. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic comparison of three widely available 3D reconstructive software programs, Amira{\circledR}, OsiriX, and Mimics{\circledR}, with respect to the software's ability to be used in two broad themes: morphometric research and education to translate morphological knowledge. Cost, system requirements, and inherent features of each program were compared. A novel concept selection tool, a decision matrix, was used to objectify comparisons of usability of the interface, quality of the output, and efficiency of the tools. Findings indicate that Mimics was the best-suited program for construction of 3D anatomical models and morphometric analysis, but for creating a learning tool the results were less clear. OsiriX was very user-friendly; however, it had limited capabilities. Conversely, although Amira had endless potential and could create complex dynamic videos, it had a challenging interface. These results provide a resource for morphometric researchers and educators to assist the selection of appropriate reconstruction programs when starting a new 3D modeling project.",
keywords = "Anatomy education, Anatomy research, Decision matrix, Digital anatomy, Image segmentation, Medical education, Morphometric research, Reconstructive technologies, Three-dimensional modeling",
author = "Martin, {Charys M.} and Roach, {Victoria A.} and Ngan Nguyen and Rice, {Charles L.} and Wilson, {Timothy D.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ase.1367",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "393--403",
journal = "Anatomical Sciences Education",
issn = "1935-9772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 3D reconstructive technologies used for morphometric research and the translation of knowledge using a decision matrix

AU - Martin, Charys M.

AU - Roach, Victoria A.

AU - Nguyen, Ngan

AU - Rice, Charles L.

AU - Wilson, Timothy D.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - The use of three-dimensional (3D) models for education, pre-operative assessment, presurgical planning, and measurement have become more prevalent. With the increase in prevalence of 3D models there has also been an increase in 3D reconstructive software programs that are used to create these models. These software programs differ in reconstruction concepts, operating system requirements, user features, cost, and no one program has emerged as the standard. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic comparison of three widely available 3D reconstructive software programs, Amira®, OsiriX, and Mimics®, with respect to the software's ability to be used in two broad themes: morphometric research and education to translate morphological knowledge. Cost, system requirements, and inherent features of each program were compared. A novel concept selection tool, a decision matrix, was used to objectify comparisons of usability of the interface, quality of the output, and efficiency of the tools. Findings indicate that Mimics was the best-suited program for construction of 3D anatomical models and morphometric analysis, but for creating a learning tool the results were less clear. OsiriX was very user-friendly; however, it had limited capabilities. Conversely, although Amira had endless potential and could create complex dynamic videos, it had a challenging interface. These results provide a resource for morphometric researchers and educators to assist the selection of appropriate reconstruction programs when starting a new 3D modeling project.

AB - The use of three-dimensional (3D) models for education, pre-operative assessment, presurgical planning, and measurement have become more prevalent. With the increase in prevalence of 3D models there has also been an increase in 3D reconstructive software programs that are used to create these models. These software programs differ in reconstruction concepts, operating system requirements, user features, cost, and no one program has emerged as the standard. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic comparison of three widely available 3D reconstructive software programs, Amira®, OsiriX, and Mimics®, with respect to the software's ability to be used in two broad themes: morphometric research and education to translate morphological knowledge. Cost, system requirements, and inherent features of each program were compared. A novel concept selection tool, a decision matrix, was used to objectify comparisons of usability of the interface, quality of the output, and efficiency of the tools. Findings indicate that Mimics was the best-suited program for construction of 3D anatomical models and morphometric analysis, but for creating a learning tool the results were less clear. OsiriX was very user-friendly; however, it had limited capabilities. Conversely, although Amira had endless potential and could create complex dynamic videos, it had a challenging interface. These results provide a resource for morphometric researchers and educators to assist the selection of appropriate reconstruction programs when starting a new 3D modeling project.

KW - Anatomy education

KW - Anatomy research

KW - Decision matrix

KW - Digital anatomy

KW - Image segmentation

KW - Medical education

KW - Morphometric research

KW - Reconstructive technologies

KW - Three-dimensional modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886581995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886581995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ase.1367

DO - 10.1002/ase.1367

M3 - Article

C2 - 23633266

AN - SCOPUS:84886581995

VL - 6

SP - 393

EP - 403

JO - Anatomical Sciences Education

JF - Anatomical Sciences Education

SN - 1935-9772

IS - 6

ER -