Comparison of angular free-in-air and tissue-equivalent phantom response measurements in p-MOSFET dosimeters

B. D. Pomije, Chulhaeng Huh, M. A. Tressler, D. E. Hintenlang, W. E. Bolch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) radiation dosimeters have found recent application in providing real-time measurement in diagnostic radiology as well as in radiotherapy. Due to the design of the MOSFET dosimeter, the response is dependent on both energy and angulation with respect to the direction of primary radiation. The axial angular dependence has been characterized for both free-in-air and for tissue-equivalent phantoms. However, neither the angular dependence normal (90-degree) to the axial rotation, nor the effects of various tissue compositions on angular dependence, have been investigated for radiation energies in the diagnostic range. To characterize the angular dependence normal to the axial rotation, we exposed three "high sensitivity" MOSFET dosimeters simultaneously to x-rays from a medical diagnostic x-ray unit over a 360-degree rotation, at 22.5-degree increments, for both free-in-air and in lung, skeletal, and soft tissue-equivalent phantoms. The MOSFET dosimeters clearly showed an angular dependence in the orientation normal-to-axial as well as in the axial rotation, both for free-in-air and in tissue-equivalent phantoms. Significant variations in response occurred when the MOSFETs were exposed at incident angles between 90 degrees and 180 degrees normal-to-axial, as compared to the normal position (i.e., the zero-degree position with the bubble-side of the MOSFETs facing the radiation source). A maximum decrease in response to 32% of normal was observed when the distal ends (end opposite the wire lead) of the dosimeters were pointing directly away from the x-ray source (270-degree position). To avoid significant errors in MOSFET dosimeter readings, placement of the dosimeters should be consistent, and care should be taken to avoid orienting the dosimeter with its sensitive region (bubble side) facing away from the source of primary radiation at particular angles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)497-505
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Physics
Volume80
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Semiconductors
Oxides
Metals
Air
Radiation
X-Rays
Radiation Dosimeters
Radiology
Reading
Radiotherapy
Lung

Keywords

  • Dosimetry
  • Internal
  • Phantom
  • Tissue equivalence
  • X rays

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Comparison of angular free-in-air and tissue-equivalent phantom response measurements in p-MOSFET dosimeters. / Pomije, B. D.; Huh, Chulhaeng; Tressler, M. A.; Hintenlang, D. E.; Bolch, W. E.

In: Health Physics, Vol. 80, No. 5, 01.01.2001, p. 497-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pomije, B. D. ; Huh, Chulhaeng ; Tressler, M. A. ; Hintenlang, D. E. ; Bolch, W. E. / Comparison of angular free-in-air and tissue-equivalent phantom response measurements in p-MOSFET dosimeters. In: Health Physics. 2001 ; Vol. 80, No. 5. pp. 497-505.
@article{36b1638db2c24a0f86e3003a5512d44d,
title = "Comparison of angular free-in-air and tissue-equivalent phantom response measurements in p-MOSFET dosimeters",
abstract = "Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) radiation dosimeters have found recent application in providing real-time measurement in diagnostic radiology as well as in radiotherapy. Due to the design of the MOSFET dosimeter, the response is dependent on both energy and angulation with respect to the direction of primary radiation. The axial angular dependence has been characterized for both free-in-air and for tissue-equivalent phantoms. However, neither the angular dependence normal (90-degree) to the axial rotation, nor the effects of various tissue compositions on angular dependence, have been investigated for radiation energies in the diagnostic range. To characterize the angular dependence normal to the axial rotation, we exposed three {"}high sensitivity{"} MOSFET dosimeters simultaneously to x-rays from a medical diagnostic x-ray unit over a 360-degree rotation, at 22.5-degree increments, for both free-in-air and in lung, skeletal, and soft tissue-equivalent phantoms. The MOSFET dosimeters clearly showed an angular dependence in the orientation normal-to-axial as well as in the axial rotation, both for free-in-air and in tissue-equivalent phantoms. Significant variations in response occurred when the MOSFETs were exposed at incident angles between 90 degrees and 180 degrees normal-to-axial, as compared to the normal position (i.e., the zero-degree position with the bubble-side of the MOSFETs facing the radiation source). A maximum decrease in response to 32{\%} of normal was observed when the distal ends (end opposite the wire lead) of the dosimeters were pointing directly away from the x-ray source (270-degree position). To avoid significant errors in MOSFET dosimeter readings, placement of the dosimeters should be consistent, and care should be taken to avoid orienting the dosimeter with its sensitive region (bubble side) facing away from the source of primary radiation at particular angles.",
keywords = "Dosimetry, Internal, Phantom, Tissue equivalence, X rays",
author = "Pomije, {B. D.} and Chulhaeng Huh and Tressler, {M. A.} and Hintenlang, {D. E.} and Bolch, {W. E.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00004032-200105000-00011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "497--505",
journal = "Health Physics",
issn = "0017-9078",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of angular free-in-air and tissue-equivalent phantom response measurements in p-MOSFET dosimeters

AU - Pomije, B. D.

AU - Huh, Chulhaeng

AU - Tressler, M. A.

AU - Hintenlang, D. E.

AU - Bolch, W. E.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) radiation dosimeters have found recent application in providing real-time measurement in diagnostic radiology as well as in radiotherapy. Due to the design of the MOSFET dosimeter, the response is dependent on both energy and angulation with respect to the direction of primary radiation. The axial angular dependence has been characterized for both free-in-air and for tissue-equivalent phantoms. However, neither the angular dependence normal (90-degree) to the axial rotation, nor the effects of various tissue compositions on angular dependence, have been investigated for radiation energies in the diagnostic range. To characterize the angular dependence normal to the axial rotation, we exposed three "high sensitivity" MOSFET dosimeters simultaneously to x-rays from a medical diagnostic x-ray unit over a 360-degree rotation, at 22.5-degree increments, for both free-in-air and in lung, skeletal, and soft tissue-equivalent phantoms. The MOSFET dosimeters clearly showed an angular dependence in the orientation normal-to-axial as well as in the axial rotation, both for free-in-air and in tissue-equivalent phantoms. Significant variations in response occurred when the MOSFETs were exposed at incident angles between 90 degrees and 180 degrees normal-to-axial, as compared to the normal position (i.e., the zero-degree position with the bubble-side of the MOSFETs facing the radiation source). A maximum decrease in response to 32% of normal was observed when the distal ends (end opposite the wire lead) of the dosimeters were pointing directly away from the x-ray source (270-degree position). To avoid significant errors in MOSFET dosimeter readings, placement of the dosimeters should be consistent, and care should be taken to avoid orienting the dosimeter with its sensitive region (bubble side) facing away from the source of primary radiation at particular angles.

AB - Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor (MOSFET) radiation dosimeters have found recent application in providing real-time measurement in diagnostic radiology as well as in radiotherapy. Due to the design of the MOSFET dosimeter, the response is dependent on both energy and angulation with respect to the direction of primary radiation. The axial angular dependence has been characterized for both free-in-air and for tissue-equivalent phantoms. However, neither the angular dependence normal (90-degree) to the axial rotation, nor the effects of various tissue compositions on angular dependence, have been investigated for radiation energies in the diagnostic range. To characterize the angular dependence normal to the axial rotation, we exposed three "high sensitivity" MOSFET dosimeters simultaneously to x-rays from a medical diagnostic x-ray unit over a 360-degree rotation, at 22.5-degree increments, for both free-in-air and in lung, skeletal, and soft tissue-equivalent phantoms. The MOSFET dosimeters clearly showed an angular dependence in the orientation normal-to-axial as well as in the axial rotation, both for free-in-air and in tissue-equivalent phantoms. Significant variations in response occurred when the MOSFETs were exposed at incident angles between 90 degrees and 180 degrees normal-to-axial, as compared to the normal position (i.e., the zero-degree position with the bubble-side of the MOSFETs facing the radiation source). A maximum decrease in response to 32% of normal was observed when the distal ends (end opposite the wire lead) of the dosimeters were pointing directly away from the x-ray source (270-degree position). To avoid significant errors in MOSFET dosimeter readings, placement of the dosimeters should be consistent, and care should be taken to avoid orienting the dosimeter with its sensitive region (bubble side) facing away from the source of primary radiation at particular angles.

KW - Dosimetry

KW - Internal

KW - Phantom

KW - Tissue equivalence

KW - X rays

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035073371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035073371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00004032-200105000-00011

DO - 10.1097/00004032-200105000-00011

M3 - Article

C2 - 11316081

AN - SCOPUS:0035073371

VL - 80

SP - 497

EP - 505

JO - Health Physics

JF - Health Physics

SN - 0017-9078

IS - 5

ER -