Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams

Michael H. Paller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stream bioassessments are usually based on a single taxonomic assemblage, often fishes or macroinvertebrates, with the assumption that this assemblage is representative of ecological conditions. However, ecological and physiological differences between taxonomic groups may result in different assessment results. In this study, concurrent fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams were compared on the basis of precision, sensitivity, accuracy, and agreement. Multimetric indices used in this comparison were a modified Index of Biotic Integrity based on electrofishing data and a benthic macroinvertebrate multimetric index based on data collected with Hester-Dendy artificial substrates. Benthic macroinvertebrates were also collected from natural substrates for comparative purposes. The Index of Biotic Integrity was more precise than the Hester- Dendy multimetric index but the average difference between disturbed and reference sites was greater for the latter resulting in equal sensitivity (i.e., ability to measure disturbance in relation to index variability). The two indices were significantly correlated (r=0.62, p<0.001), but agreement between them was weak for slightly and moderately disturbed sites. Analysis of species richness and abundance data indicated that fish and macroinvertebrates responded differently to some disturbances regardless of whether macroinvertebates were collected from Hester- Dendy samplers or natural substrates. Disagreement between macroinvertebrate and fish assessments at moderately disturbed sites indicated that biological condition could not always be adequately evaluated from a single taxonomic group. Identification of disturbed sites was most accurate when based on both indices suggesting that future research should emphasize cost-effective sampling and integration of information from multiple taxonomic groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-186
Number of pages12
JournalAquatic Ecosystem Health and Management
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

biological assessment
coastal plains
macroinvertebrates
coastal plain
macroinvertebrate
fish
Index of Biotic Integrity
disturbance
substrate
artificial substrate
electrofishing
samplers
sampler
index
comparison
species richness
species diversity
sampling
cost

Keywords

  • Aquatic
  • Assessment
  • Benthos
  • Health
  • IBI The information contained in this report was developed during U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500
  • Indices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aquatic Science
  • Ecology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams. / Paller, Michael H.

In: Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, 01.01.2001, p. 175-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dbb07c752da54f928f41edb36a64e067,
title = "Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams",
abstract = "Stream bioassessments are usually based on a single taxonomic assemblage, often fishes or macroinvertebrates, with the assumption that this assemblage is representative of ecological conditions. However, ecological and physiological differences between taxonomic groups may result in different assessment results. In this study, concurrent fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams were compared on the basis of precision, sensitivity, accuracy, and agreement. Multimetric indices used in this comparison were a modified Index of Biotic Integrity based on electrofishing data and a benthic macroinvertebrate multimetric index based on data collected with Hester-Dendy artificial substrates. Benthic macroinvertebrates were also collected from natural substrates for comparative purposes. The Index of Biotic Integrity was more precise than the Hester- Dendy multimetric index but the average difference between disturbed and reference sites was greater for the latter resulting in equal sensitivity (i.e., ability to measure disturbance in relation to index variability). The two indices were significantly correlated (r=0.62, p<0.001), but agreement between them was weak for slightly and moderately disturbed sites. Analysis of species richness and abundance data indicated that fish and macroinvertebrates responded differently to some disturbances regardless of whether macroinvertebates were collected from Hester- Dendy samplers or natural substrates. Disagreement between macroinvertebrate and fish assessments at moderately disturbed sites indicated that biological condition could not always be adequately evaluated from a single taxonomic group. Identification of disturbed sites was most accurate when based on both indices suggesting that future research should emphasize cost-effective sampling and integration of information from multiple taxonomic groups.",
keywords = "Aquatic, Assessment, Benthos, Health, IBI The information contained in this report was developed during U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500, Indices",
author = "Paller, {Michael H.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14634980127707",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "175--186",
journal = "Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management",
issn = "1463-4988",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams

AU - Paller, Michael H.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Stream bioassessments are usually based on a single taxonomic assemblage, often fishes or macroinvertebrates, with the assumption that this assemblage is representative of ecological conditions. However, ecological and physiological differences between taxonomic groups may result in different assessment results. In this study, concurrent fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams were compared on the basis of precision, sensitivity, accuracy, and agreement. Multimetric indices used in this comparison were a modified Index of Biotic Integrity based on electrofishing data and a benthic macroinvertebrate multimetric index based on data collected with Hester-Dendy artificial substrates. Benthic macroinvertebrates were also collected from natural substrates for comparative purposes. The Index of Biotic Integrity was more precise than the Hester- Dendy multimetric index but the average difference between disturbed and reference sites was greater for the latter resulting in equal sensitivity (i.e., ability to measure disturbance in relation to index variability). The two indices were significantly correlated (r=0.62, p<0.001), but agreement between them was weak for slightly and moderately disturbed sites. Analysis of species richness and abundance data indicated that fish and macroinvertebrates responded differently to some disturbances regardless of whether macroinvertebates were collected from Hester- Dendy samplers or natural substrates. Disagreement between macroinvertebrate and fish assessments at moderately disturbed sites indicated that biological condition could not always be adequately evaluated from a single taxonomic group. Identification of disturbed sites was most accurate when based on both indices suggesting that future research should emphasize cost-effective sampling and integration of information from multiple taxonomic groups.

AB - Stream bioassessments are usually based on a single taxonomic assemblage, often fishes or macroinvertebrates, with the assumption that this assemblage is representative of ecological conditions. However, ecological and physiological differences between taxonomic groups may result in different assessment results. In this study, concurrent fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams were compared on the basis of precision, sensitivity, accuracy, and agreement. Multimetric indices used in this comparison were a modified Index of Biotic Integrity based on electrofishing data and a benthic macroinvertebrate multimetric index based on data collected with Hester-Dendy artificial substrates. Benthic macroinvertebrates were also collected from natural substrates for comparative purposes. The Index of Biotic Integrity was more precise than the Hester- Dendy multimetric index but the average difference between disturbed and reference sites was greater for the latter resulting in equal sensitivity (i.e., ability to measure disturbance in relation to index variability). The two indices were significantly correlated (r=0.62, p<0.001), but agreement between them was weak for slightly and moderately disturbed sites. Analysis of species richness and abundance data indicated that fish and macroinvertebrates responded differently to some disturbances regardless of whether macroinvertebates were collected from Hester- Dendy samplers or natural substrates. Disagreement between macroinvertebrate and fish assessments at moderately disturbed sites indicated that biological condition could not always be adequately evaluated from a single taxonomic group. Identification of disturbed sites was most accurate when based on both indices suggesting that future research should emphasize cost-effective sampling and integration of information from multiple taxonomic groups.

KW - Aquatic

KW - Assessment

KW - Benthos

KW - Health

KW - IBI The information contained in this report was developed during U.S. Department of Energy Contract No. DE-AC09-96SR18500

KW - Indices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011210222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011210222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14634980127707

DO - 10.1080/14634980127707

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85011210222

VL - 4

SP - 175

EP - 186

JO - Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management

JF - Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management

SN - 1463-4988

IS - 2

ER -