Comparison of swallowing outcomes of laryngotracheal separation versus total laryngectomy in a validated ovine model of profound oropharyngeal dysphagia

N. N. Venkatesan, C. M. Johnson, M. T. Siddiqui, D. J. Cates, M. A. Kuhn, G. N. Postma, P. C. Belafsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Scopus citations


Objectives: To validate the ovine model of profound oropharyngeal dysphagia and compare swallowing outcomes of laryngotracheal separation with those of total laryngectomy. Methods: Under real-time fluoroscopy, swallowing trials were conducted using the head and neck of two Dorper cross ewes and one human cadaver, secured in lateral fluoroscopic orientation. Barium trials were administered at baseline, pre-and post-laryngohyoid suspension, following laryngotracheal separation, and following laryngectomy in the ovine model. Results: Mean pre-intervention Penetration Aspiration Scale and National Institutes of Health Swallow Safety Scale scores were 8 ± 0 and 6 ± 0 respectively in sheep and human cadavers, with 100 per cent intra-and inter-species reproducibility. These scores improved to 1 ± 0 and 2 ± 0 post-laryngohyoid suspension (p < 0.01). Aerodigestive tract residue was 18.6 ± 2.4 ml at baseline, 15.4 ± 3.8 ml after laryngotracheal separation and 3.0 ± 0.7 ml after total laryngectomy (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ovine model displayed perfect intra-and inter-species reliability for the Penetration Aspiration Scale and Swallow Safety Scale. Less aerodigestive tract residue after narrow-field laryngectomy suggests that swallowing outcomes after total laryngectomy are superior to those after laryngotracheal separation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)350-356
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017



  • Deglutition Disorders
  • Experimental Animal Model
  • Laryngectomy
  • Respiratory Aspiration
  • Surgical Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this