Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke

Hannes Devos, Abiodun Emmanuel Akinwuntan, Alice Nieuwboer, Mark Tant, Steven Truijen, Liesbet De Wit, Carlotte Kiekens, Willy De Weerdt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Several driving retraining programs have been developed to improve driving skills after stroke. Those programs rely on different rehabilitation concepts. Objectives. The current study sought to examine the specific carryover effect of driving skills of a comprehensive training program in a driving simulator when compared with a cognitive training program. Methods. Further analysis from a previous randomized controlled trial that investigated the effect of simulator training on driving after stroke. Forty-two participants received simulator-based driving training, whereas 41 participants received cognitive training for 15 hours. Overall performance in the on-road test and each of its 13 items were compared between groups immediately posttraining and at 6 months poststroke. Results. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed that the total score on the on-road test and each item score improved significantly over time for both groups. Those who received driving simulator training achieved better results when compared with the cognitive training group in the overall on-road score and the items of anticipation and perception of signs, visual behavior and communication, quality of traffic participation, and turning left. Most of the differences in improvement between the 2 interventions were observed at 6 months poststroke. Conclusions. Contextual training in a driving simulator appeared to be superior to cognitive training to treat impaired on-road driving skills after stroke. The effects were primarily seen in visuointegrative driving skills. Our results favor the implementation of driving simulator therapy in the conventional rehabilitation program of subacute stroke patients with mild deficits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)699-705
Number of pages7
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

Stroke
Rehabilitation
Education
Visual Perception
Randomized Controlled Trials
Communication
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Automobile driving
  • Driving simulator
  • Rehabilitation
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Devos, H., Akinwuntan, A. E., Nieuwboer, A., Tant, M., Truijen, S., De Wit, L., ... De Weerdt, W. (2009). Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23(7), 699-705. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309334208

Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke. / Devos, Hannes; Akinwuntan, Abiodun Emmanuel; Nieuwboer, Alice; Tant, Mark; Truijen, Steven; De Wit, Liesbet; Kiekens, Carlotte; De Weerdt, Willy.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 23, No. 7, 01.09.2009, p. 699-705.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Devos, H, Akinwuntan, AE, Nieuwboer, A, Tant, M, Truijen, S, De Wit, L, Kiekens, C & De Weerdt, W 2009, 'Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke', Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 699-705. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309334208
Devos, Hannes ; Akinwuntan, Abiodun Emmanuel ; Nieuwboer, Alice ; Tant, Mark ; Truijen, Steven ; De Wit, Liesbet ; Kiekens, Carlotte ; De Weerdt, Willy. / Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke. In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2009 ; Vol. 23, No. 7. pp. 699-705.
@article{90d69a3d089b4573a049ac354294cdc1,
title = "Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke",
abstract = "Background. Several driving retraining programs have been developed to improve driving skills after stroke. Those programs rely on different rehabilitation concepts. Objectives. The current study sought to examine the specific carryover effect of driving skills of a comprehensive training program in a driving simulator when compared with a cognitive training program. Methods. Further analysis from a previous randomized controlled trial that investigated the effect of simulator training on driving after stroke. Forty-two participants received simulator-based driving training, whereas 41 participants received cognitive training for 15 hours. Overall performance in the on-road test and each of its 13 items were compared between groups immediately posttraining and at 6 months poststroke. Results. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed that the total score on the on-road test and each item score improved significantly over time for both groups. Those who received driving simulator training achieved better results when compared with the cognitive training group in the overall on-road score and the items of anticipation and perception of signs, visual behavior and communication, quality of traffic participation, and turning left. Most of the differences in improvement between the 2 interventions were observed at 6 months poststroke. Conclusions. Contextual training in a driving simulator appeared to be superior to cognitive training to treat impaired on-road driving skills after stroke. The effects were primarily seen in visuointegrative driving skills. Our results favor the implementation of driving simulator therapy in the conventional rehabilitation program of subacute stroke patients with mild deficits.",
keywords = "Automobile driving, Driving simulator, Rehabilitation, Stroke",
author = "Hannes Devos and Akinwuntan, {Abiodun Emmanuel} and Alice Nieuwboer and Mark Tant and Steven Truijen and {De Wit}, Liesbet and Carlotte Kiekens and {De Weerdt}, Willy",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1545968309334208",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "699--705",
journal = "Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke

AU - Devos, Hannes

AU - Akinwuntan, Abiodun Emmanuel

AU - Nieuwboer, Alice

AU - Tant, Mark

AU - Truijen, Steven

AU - De Wit, Liesbet

AU - Kiekens, Carlotte

AU - De Weerdt, Willy

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Background. Several driving retraining programs have been developed to improve driving skills after stroke. Those programs rely on different rehabilitation concepts. Objectives. The current study sought to examine the specific carryover effect of driving skills of a comprehensive training program in a driving simulator when compared with a cognitive training program. Methods. Further analysis from a previous randomized controlled trial that investigated the effect of simulator training on driving after stroke. Forty-two participants received simulator-based driving training, whereas 41 participants received cognitive training for 15 hours. Overall performance in the on-road test and each of its 13 items were compared between groups immediately posttraining and at 6 months poststroke. Results. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed that the total score on the on-road test and each item score improved significantly over time for both groups. Those who received driving simulator training achieved better results when compared with the cognitive training group in the overall on-road score and the items of anticipation and perception of signs, visual behavior and communication, quality of traffic participation, and turning left. Most of the differences in improvement between the 2 interventions were observed at 6 months poststroke. Conclusions. Contextual training in a driving simulator appeared to be superior to cognitive training to treat impaired on-road driving skills after stroke. The effects were primarily seen in visuointegrative driving skills. Our results favor the implementation of driving simulator therapy in the conventional rehabilitation program of subacute stroke patients with mild deficits.

AB - Background. Several driving retraining programs have been developed to improve driving skills after stroke. Those programs rely on different rehabilitation concepts. Objectives. The current study sought to examine the specific carryover effect of driving skills of a comprehensive training program in a driving simulator when compared with a cognitive training program. Methods. Further analysis from a previous randomized controlled trial that investigated the effect of simulator training on driving after stroke. Forty-two participants received simulator-based driving training, whereas 41 participants received cognitive training for 15 hours. Overall performance in the on-road test and each of its 13 items were compared between groups immediately posttraining and at 6 months poststroke. Results. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed that the total score on the on-road test and each item score improved significantly over time for both groups. Those who received driving simulator training achieved better results when compared with the cognitive training group in the overall on-road score and the items of anticipation and perception of signs, visual behavior and communication, quality of traffic participation, and turning left. Most of the differences in improvement between the 2 interventions were observed at 6 months poststroke. Conclusions. Contextual training in a driving simulator appeared to be superior to cognitive training to treat impaired on-road driving skills after stroke. The effects were primarily seen in visuointegrative driving skills. Our results favor the implementation of driving simulator therapy in the conventional rehabilitation program of subacute stroke patients with mild deficits.

KW - Automobile driving

KW - Driving simulator

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69449105482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69449105482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1545968309334208

DO - 10.1177/1545968309334208

M3 - Article

C2 - 19386794

AN - SCOPUS:69449105482

VL - 23

SP - 699

EP - 705

JO - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

JF - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

SN - 1545-9683

IS - 7

ER -