Comparison of two low sensitivity whiteners

Richard S. Callan, William D. Browning, Mary C. Downey, Martha G. Brackett, William W. Brackett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate two commercially available doctor-supplied, patient-applied, bleaching systems for their ability to whiten the maxillary anterior teeth while at the same time not causing sensitivity. Methods: 46 participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: One group received Rembrandt Xtra-Comfort and the other group Nite White Excel 2Z. Bleaching stents were fabricated and the bleaching systems were used following manufacturers' instructions. Participants recorded tray use and any sensitivity on a daily basis. Participants bleached for 2 weeks followed by 2 weeks of no bleaching. Color was evaluated at the first, second and fourth week following the initial delivery of bleaching trays. Color change was measured using the Vita Classic Shade Guide arranged by value. Results: As a group, participants in the NW2Z group bleached for 302 days with a total of 48 days (16%) of sensitivity recorded. The Rembrandt Xtra Comfort group bleached for 313 total days with 97 days (31%) of sensitivity recorded. The difference in sensitivity between the two products proved to be statistically significant (Chi-square analysis, P≤ 0.0001). The median shade change for both products following 2 weeks of active treatment was six tabs. At the 4-week evaluation, the median shade change was 5.5 and 6.0 tabs respectively for Rembrandt and Nite White. There was no statistical difference between the products in respect to shade change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-20
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of dentistry
Volume21
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 2008

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Callan, R. S., Browning, W. D., Downey, M. C., Brackett, M. G., & Brackett, W. W. (2008). Comparison of two low sensitivity whiteners. American journal of dentistry, 21(1), 17-20.